A+ for effort, but the truth is that this build would most likely have less than 100 parts had you used fuselage blocks. It therefore would not lag so much, have the potential to look better and it would have taken far less time to build as well.
I like it. My recommendations for the future are that you should use fuselage blocks more. They are pretty close to infinitely customisable and can do far more than blocks while keeping the part count down. Having custom paint jobs would also draw more people in than just having the standard one.
You have to upload them to something like imgur and then do this:
![]*(direct link of the picture) but without the *.
There's no way of directly getting pictures to posts from your device.
You should probably put "not usable on low physics" to the description, because when you do use it on low physics, the backpropeller blows up if you do anything with it.
You have to upload them to something like imgur and then do this to get the image to appear in a forum or a plane description:
![]*(direct link of the image) but without the *
Brilliant, reminds me of the stuff people used to make back when SP was new
+2A+ for effort, but the truth is that this build would most likely have less than 100 parts had you used fuselage blocks. It therefore would not lag so much, have the potential to look better and it would have taken far less time to build as well.
Thank you for the upvotes
+1@Thorne Thank you
+1Interesting
+1I like it. My recommendations for the future are that you should use fuselage blocks more. They are pretty close to infinitely customisable and can do far more than blocks while keeping the part count down. Having custom paint jobs would also draw more people in than just having the standard one.
It's ok. I like the shape of it.
Better than what I can do.
+1And I thought it was a map mod on the Pan-Am video...
The top one
Now THIS is how you create a fictional country!
+12
The search thing literally already exists.
2
T
*Cleaver
@Thueerra Pari vuotta
+1@Thueerra Aa, luin ton niinku se olis ollu englanninkielinen sana.
B
@Thueerra ?¿
Scania R next Gen
@tsampoy Thank you
You have to upload them to something like imgur and then do this:
![]*(direct link of the picture) but without the *.
There's no way of directly getting pictures to posts from your device.
Why not post them as unlisted?
You should probably put "not usable on low physics" to the description, because when you do use it on low physics, the backpropeller blows up if you do anything with it.
+1@InternationalAircraftCompany Comment upvoting
@Draxfire What exactly does that have to do with this?
+3You wrote the description twice.
A
You have to upload them to something like imgur and then do this to get the image to appear in a forum or a plane description:
![]*(direct link of the image) but without the *
Direct link
@EpicPigster1 Are you working on the results?
Fletcher?
Stop
Don't. There are already loads.
@Awsomur How much did james do?
*drag chute
It isn't a successor...
No
You should definitely put instructions to the description.
@BACconcordepilot It's because the lighting of the designer.
You should put the controls to the description.
*made
@Minecraft543 Apple doesn't allow mods or modding on their devices.
When I try to download, it says it failed to import. What game version are you using?
Why don't build one yourself?
@Quagga CoM and CoL are way too close to each other. Also, make those kind of posts unlisted(you can change this when sharing it).
@RedstoneAeroAviation Yes
It doesn't have enough lift?
It means it's landing. This happens when you spawn AI planes on final approach.