@QingyuZhou thank you for credit.. nice workshop.. now we have seamless 737 cheek, which was difficult to achieve back then.. maybe my 777 9x nose will be in the next hollow cockpit workshop since it reusable as template for [777series & 767series (similar basic shape)]
[dc10 & md11 (similar basic shape with sligtly different side windshield)] 777&md11/dc10 777&767
@ViridiCinis yes maybe if its 100 it will be like ufo or anti-gravity.. actually i didt calculate the Power/Weight Ratio.. the main thing is :
- use wing part as rotor blade
- adjust the speed of rotator and find right speed
- to achieve right amount of down thrust so the height not changing when its hover on idle
so this chopper go up and down using aileron angle of spinning wings without increase/decrease rotator speed as throttle..
to make it more stable :
- set the weight distribution to dead center of rotor axis
- make it as coaxial rotor system to prevent the body yaw interrupted by rotor torque (since gyroscope not exist yet in the time i build this)
- downsize each blade in y-axis so they appear more thin and to prevent huge vibration
@ConquerorOfSky thanks but i thing the nose is too jagged compare to the photo.. and im too lazy to fix it :D. Oo its so ambiguous info about this plane on google.. and i dont have enough valid references when build it.. how sure are you? its okay if i need to change the tittle..
@CobraCommand sure its cool right.. @QingyuZhou
@CobraCommand have a nice day
+1@AnonymousUser9999 thanks..
@Delphinos yoo hooo
@QingyuZhou its okay
@QingyuZhou yes
@QingyuZhou lets make the video
great details good job..
@LusKa same its awesome..
@agent33 sure its okay.. thanks btw
here the
updated version
other collection *fictional
and another *fictional
nice upgrade
@Minionthemighty thanks
enjoy the flight
@QingyuZhou thank you for credit.. nice workshop.. now we have seamless 737 cheek, which was difficult to achieve back then.. maybe my 777 9x nose will be in the next hollow cockpit workshop since it reusable as template for [777series & 767series (similar basic shape)]
+2[dc10 & md11 (similar basic shape with sligtly different side windshield)]
777&md11/dc10
777&767
nuoaice
@breitling oho its true.. nope its too hard for me :D
+1@breitling hahaha why..??
@QingyuZhou i know :D
@PyrusEnderhunter aaa that tag.. i see..
@PyrusEnderhunter really.. front page of what..?? i didnt realize.. but thank you my friends..
@AJosh92FS enhanced version by dimkal
@leldotcom yea sort of
@leldotcom just acknowledge sound :D
ohow
@Dann810 no im just stand on its huge tire.. my father was sparepart guy back then
great.. bring back my child hood memory..
@Davisplanez yes it should be run on high physic and the control is so sensitive dont fully throttle the VTOL
@Davisplanez thanks.. enjoy the flight..
@Davisplanez its replica..
great
gd jb.. kp gng..
@ACMECo1940 thanks
@ViridiCinis yes maybe if its 100 it will be like ufo or anti-gravity.. actually i didt calculate the Power/Weight Ratio.. the main thing is :
+1- use wing part as rotor blade
- adjust the speed of rotator and find right speed
- to achieve right amount of down thrust so the height not changing when its hover on idle
so this chopper go up and down using aileron angle of spinning wings without increase/decrease rotator speed as throttle..
to make it more stable :
- set the weight distribution to dead center of rotor axis
- make it as coaxial rotor system to prevent the body yaw interrupted by rotor torque (since gyroscope not exist yet in the time i build this)
- downsize each blade in y-axis so they appear more thin and to prevent huge vibration
good keep going to make more detail livery
C'<------------------------*
@Zoomzoom999 pretty good tho.. thank you.. :)
@Scaniagek yeah i found it after..
@QingyuZhou sure..
@QingyuZhou im back enough :D
BDF Tandem will be cool
+1nice modification..
@Tazziedevil04 dont worry.. you can make plane or vehicle that never been built as good by others.. or things that more amusing one..
@Tazziedevil04 i like the mechanism of B732 engine thrust reverser
@Tazziedevil04 sure.. nice improvement.. :)
oow sew qyewt
@WaffleCakes yes im still active in website.. sure.. 787 too
@ConquerorOfSky thanks but i thing the nose is too jagged compare to the photo.. and im too lazy to fix it :D. Oo its so ambiguous info about this plane on google.. and i dont have enough valid references when build it.. how sure are you? its okay if i need to change the tittle..
nice.. here some reference for tail shape
lets race
@CALVIN232
@iLikeipads thanks.. enjoy the flight..
@iLikeipads sure.. and minus empty weight :D