@stormy780 thanks for your comments she's nose light without weapons at anything over 75% power and I agree about her being a bit nose when loaded up, the missiles are new to me and obviously cause quite a bit of drag.
@SpiritusRaptor @hypnotoad @Vikdesigns @StealthBomber @WalrusAircraft @Viper28 @planesnthings @JacobHardy64 @Hunter77 @Th3Champ @FredDeane @SirGorbachev @Electra10 @Griffith @CheekyMonkey @Ibecreepen @NasaSpace101@KingDeadshot @Kevpilot You have all be kind enough to leave comment on planes I have made in the past, if you have a few moments to give this a flight and tell me honestly what you think it would help it's development.
@Hypnoticchicken as promised I've uploaded my effort at a folding wings ground attack aircraft, thought you deserved a chance to give me some feedback as I was harsh on yours;
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/D8Bm5E/Vintage-Naval-Strike-Aircraft
I'm not going to do anything tonight but tomorrow I promise a single engined fighter with folded wings, retracted gear etc. I don't want to upset you but as I've said I think you are capable of more.
I'm very aware of the trouble of sorting the folded wing balance out, been there done that deleted the results twice, my major issue with the way it flies was the wing flex and as a result you had a significant lag from pulling the stick to the nose coming up or going down. But it's completely up to you if you wish to ignore my comments feel free I think though you know in your heart of hearts that this could have been better.
@Th3Champ fair enough I suppose the Grob I posted wasn't the prettiest plane to ever fly I was just wondering if as they hadn't all been linked as successors you had lost track of some entries.
@TheOwlAce it's OK I added that comment before your edit so you hadn't at the time cleared anything up, reading the above now makes clear what you feel happy doing although it would limit you from making anything much bigger than a single engined bomber.
Good effort at a vtol, take off is nice and controlled and on landing it's not horrifically difficult to slow her and come down in a semi controlled manner, wider gear spacing may have saved me loosing a wingtip but then again perhaps not.
A really solid entry like the landing gear the flaps work although I'm not sure I would fancy flying on or off USS Tiny in her. Would suggest better power and the use of airbrakes to make it even better on short field performance.
@Spikerya you did hence the successor link to your plane, this example though flies far better and you get partial credits should anyone choose to rate it or make a successor.
I like the way it looks, it's ok to fly but certainly could do with a power upgrade and the gear should fold flat against the wing rather than backwards (or forwards which is dangerous). A good effort though.
@Electra10 sorry to hear that post a video of it doing that so I can hopefully understand what went wrong and fix it as its been safe when everyone else has flown it.
I'm with @Allstarship you can repost as many times as you like with as many paint jobs and tweaks to a missile as as you want it's still an uncredited copy you are spamming with and just harvesting stars, you muddy the water with the successor line and don't even mention it's originators. Post an original plane that you have made and let the community decide if it's any good.
@IMDABEST the thing is I credit the initial builder, link from his plane and have significantly altered several parts of the original but you seem to do none of the above which is in clear violation of the rules relating to succession. Contribute something original and ask for help if you need it rather than passing off stuff that clearly isn't yours.
@carter2 @Me600 so you would both like the wings to unfold faster, point taken for the next effort.
@stormy780 thanks for your comments she's nose light without weapons at anything over 75% power and I agree about her being a bit nose when loaded up, the missiles are new to me and obviously cause quite a bit of drag.
Do we have to use your torpedo or can we use our own/another person's?
@Krypticon, nice and yet only 4 stars? What would you like to see for the 5th? @Jayjaynz many thanks.
@carter2 many thanks, any suggestions on how you would like to see it evolve please leave so that I can read later.
@SpiritusRaptor @hypnotoad @Vikdesigns @StealthBomber @WalrusAircraft @Viper28 @planesnthings @JacobHardy64 @Hunter77 @Th3Champ @FredDeane @SirGorbachev @Electra10 @Griffith @CheekyMonkey @Ibecreepen @NasaSpace101@KingDeadshot @Kevpilot You have all be kind enough to leave comment on planes I have made in the past, if you have a few moments to give this a flight and tell me honestly what you think it would help it's development.
@Hypnoticchicken as promised I've uploaded my effort at a folding wings ground attack aircraft, thought you deserved a chance to give me some feedback as I was harsh on yours; https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/D8Bm5E/Vintage-Naval-Strike-Aircraft
Just uploaded this using your 8 rocket racks; https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/D8Bm5E/Vintage-Naval-Strike-Aircraft
I'm not going to do anything tonight but tomorrow I promise a single engined fighter with folded wings, retracted gear etc. I don't want to upset you but as I've said I think you are capable of more.
@SpiritusRaptor haven't downloaded them so would be a little pointless, given that I commented I can find them though.
I'm very aware of the trouble of sorting the folded wing balance out, been there done that deleted the results twice, my major issue with the way it flies was the wing flex and as a result you had a significant lag from pulling the stick to the nose coming up or going down. But it's completely up to you if you wish to ignore my comments feel free I think though you know in your heart of hearts that this could have been better.
There you go sorted, still think you can do better.
Some cool stuff there
It was ment to be humorous but I shall edit it.
@Th3Champ you commented on and rated the aircraft
@Th3Champ fair enough I suppose the Grob I posted wasn't the prettiest plane to ever fly I was just wondering if as they hadn't all been linked as successors you had lost track of some entries.
Saw one of these on Tomorrow's World in the early 90's the 'inventor' was an interesting fella.
It's certainly not a Mosquito, perhaps a Vampire? Anyway have some stars and welcome to the asylum.
I know it's individual preference but how did you sort your winners?
That's a serial number.
@PlanesOfOld @Fredeane had a go at the flying beadstead worth having a look at his.
I think his cereal is in reference to what he had for breakfast.
@TheOwlAce it's OK I added that comment before your edit so you hadn't at the time cleared anything up, reading the above now makes clear what you feel happy doing although it would limit you from making anything much bigger than a single engined bomber.
Good effort at a vtol, take off is nice and controlled and on landing it's not horrifically difficult to slow her and come down in a semi controlled manner, wider gear spacing may have saved me loosing a wingtip but then again perhaps not.
Well I'm glad you cleared that up! 😀😁😂
A really solid entry like the landing gear the flaps work although I'm not sure I would fancy flying on or off USS Tiny in her. Would suggest better power and the use of airbrakes to make it even better on short field performance.
@StaticSpud follow the link; https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/vSuGW5/USAF-Century-Fighters
Concorde? It's a f104 Starfighter perhaps rename it and perhaps post it into the century fighter challenge to gain more ratings.
@Th3Champ it's my plane, follow the successor link it's an armed version of a plane I uploaded a couple of months ago.
@hypnotoad Thanks for your kind words.
@Spikerya oh and if you want to check out my previous IAI Nesher here's a link; https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/RB894y/IAI-Nesher
@Spikerya you did hence the successor link to your plane, this example though flies far better and you get partial credits should anyone choose to rate it or make a successor.
@Th3Champ contender for your bomber challenge.
Excellent build one of my favourite planes of the late 30's.
See fixed version for instructions/solutions/idea.
I like your 'ground nail' stuck it in favourites so I can play some more with it soon.
Was also a delta wing aircraft (one big triangle for the wing and tailplane).
Hope it gets better soon if not get a referral to the hospital, you have to look after your sight.
@ILoveplanez perfectly fine, post up your results and job jobbed.
I like the way it looks, it's ok to fly but certainly could do with a power upgrade and the gear should fold flat against the wing rather than backwards (or forwards which is dangerous). A good effort though.
I thought 3 weeks was plenty of time?
Nice looking build.
So I'm the only one commenting Legomore you have the final choice go for it.
Give me a bell when you've worked out my simple fix and I will remove this variant.
I've also sort of fixed it, lots of nose cones you need to stick back on but the thing should fly.
@Electra10 are you my stalker or something, five months since I posted about a plane and you suddenly feel the need to call me a bully?
@Electra10 sorry to hear that post a video of it doing that so I can hopefully understand what went wrong and fix it as its been safe when everyone else has flown it.
Looks good have saved it to visit later.
I'm with @Allstarship you can repost as many times as you like with as many paint jobs and tweaks to a missile as as you want it's still an uncredited copy you are spamming with and just harvesting stars, you muddy the water with the successor line and don't even mention it's originators. Post an original plane that you have made and let the community decide if it's any good.
@IMDABEST the thing is I credit the initial builder, link from his plane and have significantly altered several parts of the original but you seem to do none of the above which is in clear violation of the rules relating to succession. Contribute something original and ask for help if you need it rather than passing off stuff that clearly isn't yours.