@Dinogone you really aren't trying that hard then, she will do 3300mph in a vertical climb at about 70,000ft, although low down 2300mph at sea level is more fun.
@Matthew240 I've just downloaded again, back of Tiny, 100% power and stick back and she's in the water every time. Even from the back of jundroo there's not enough airspeed for her to lift off, tail doesn't have elevators for example.
@Nickasaurus two additional engines, two large intakes, four airbrakes (vtol slide) and the gear moved so she's able to nose up on a deck, that and yaw control, vectored thrust and significant elevator alteration, it's a prety significant evolution if you ask me.
@LOSTechOrdnance best advice I can give is add a thin bit of fuselage to the edge of the rotator you want the door to be on that allows you to add structural panels from the edge you want rather than the middle of the block. You can also add thin fuselage to panel edges to allow you to add a panel to the none attachment edge.
@LOSTechOrdnance structural panels are the easiest way of building a void space although I prefer half block wide fuselage sections. An example would be https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/x9Q5oV/Avro-Lancaster-MK2-parts-trimmed
COT on top of COM is first step add in some rcn nozzles and you should be OK for vertical flight. Here's an example I just built. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/D0H4eO/Quick-vtol
@FighterPilotDesigner418 green and tan is the usual upperworks colour scheme, admittedly perhaps a lot more green would look better, but camouflaged wings would be too many parts for sure.
It's hazardous but fun for a few moments.
Nice update on concept.
Looks good, can't play with it yet as need the update.
Kindle update?
To be honest what do you expect with all that weight behind the rear wheels and wings.
Add fuel to the nose and increase engine power too a thousand horse power and this becomes quite a pleasant plane to fly.
@JacobHardy64 I've seen the issue, simply rectified by not using more than 20% during take off.
@Dinogone you really aren't trying that hard then, she will do 3300mph in a vertical climb at about 70,000ft, although low down 2300mph at sea level is more fun.
@JacobHardy64 how did you initiate the spin? Full power and pitch I would expect it to pitch up and over.
@titanplanes101 depends on speed and fuel load.
Making it amphibious was a good idea, I would rather have normal props I think so I've uploaded and altered variant.
@titanplanes101 I'm surprised you couldn't land as its stable enough and will pitch up quickly enough, trick is to come in slow (120mph or less).
It's easy enough to fly
@JacobHardy64 really? Nose down at 80mph tail comes up and then let go and she floats away in my experience
@mattmck indeed I did say I would find a use for it.
Lancaster has 4 engine and looks nothing like this.
I'm not keen on infinite fuel, what else did you change?
It's not yours, you've not even bothered with changing the paint or anything.
@Matthew240 I've just downloaded again, back of Tiny, 100% power and stick back and she's in the water every time. Even from the back of jundroo there's not enough airspeed for her to lift off, tail doesn't have elevators for example.
@Nickasaurus two additional engines, two large intakes, four airbrakes (vtol slide) and the gear moved so she's able to nose up on a deck, that and yaw control, vectored thrust and significant elevator alteration, it's a prety significant evolution if you ask me.
@Matthew240 your names at the top, quite clearly a successor.
@Matthew240 you can't get in the air off either of the carriers and would struggle to get it onto either.
I like it but it's not suitable as it is for carrier opps.
It's good but that engine? Turn it down, mach 3 at 500ft.....
@DragosMCR follow the link under successor aircraft it's already up.
@FighterCrafter14 from time to time, mostly not though as I tend to use a tablet mostly.
Great looking but that overclocked jet spoils it.
@GINGER007 really? https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/972Ee3/Consolidated-B-24-Liberator
It's not bad at all, I made a couple of alterations, hope you don't mind.
Needs a bomb bay for a start.
Nice first effort welcome to SP.
Good effort.
For the effort, I can't get it to run on the tablet though.
@LOSTechOrdnance yep get it uploaded
@LOSTechOrdnance best advice I can give is add a thin bit of fuselage to the edge of the rotator you want the door to be on that allows you to add structural panels from the edge you want rather than the middle of the block. You can also add thin fuselage to panel edges to allow you to add a panel to the none attachment edge.
@Garuda1 paint it and arm it if you wish.
@LOSTechOrdnance structural panels are the easiest way of building a void space although I prefer half block wide fuselage sections. An example would be https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/x9Q5oV/Avro-Lancaster-MK2-parts-trimmed
You've made this vast bomber yet not added a bomb bay?
Looks good added to favourites for future use.
Main gear folds inwards on a Mustang.
COT on top of COM is first step add in some rcn nozzles and you should be OK for vertical flight. Here's an example I just built. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/D0H4eO/Quick-vtol
You can cause a catastrophic failure on any of the prop planes by taking the blade pitch controls onto manual setting.
@FighterPilotDesigner418 green and tan is the usual upperworks colour scheme, admittedly perhaps a lot more green would look better, but camouflaged wings would be too many parts for sure.
Still not a great flying machine. Let's see what we can do.
Delete some of the wheels and you make it better, mirror image the beast also works to remove the imbalance.
It flies, what do you need help with?
Nice enough little plane, maybe could have done with being a bit longer.
I think it should hence forth be known as `Bertram the Barrel', God bless all who fly in him.
Powerful yes, fast no.
@ProKillaV12 Roundal is Pakistani, as in the initial version I see this as a low tech high effect weapon delivery system.