Landing gear- 9
Control Surfaces (Not flaps)- 4
Flaps- 19
Wingflex-6
Engines-4
.
42 Rotators/Pistons actually. (I included pistons because they have the same performance impact as rotators)
Just follow the instructions I gave you. Don't forget that you can manually change the trim by rotating the horizontal stabilizers with fine tuner. It doesn't really matter what engine combination you use if you trim it correctly.
Alright. Just try to centel the middle engine along the plane's vertical center of mass as much as possible and make the engines with the same thrust. If the plane is still pitching down, you can always just rotate the Horizontal stabilizers a little up to correct it.
you can check out my 727-200 advanced. I don't know if you want to build a trijet with two engines in the front, or all three in the back like a falcon 9X/727. My 727 has engines of all the same thrust, and with the middle engine along the airplane's center of mass (vertically) as much as possible. I know you've already seen that, but here is the link for that:
@Yeetusyeee I was unfortunately never able to work out the floppiness of the gear, sp really doesn't like super complex weight-bearing mechanisms. Hopefully this is adjusted in SP2.
Just to let you know, the archer doesn't have elevators but instead has an all-flying stabilator. I fly one, if you need pictures for reference let me know.
@Sense2 It has the same wings, similar engines, my gear, and tail structure. there is nothing more complete than this... Also why do you want a 3 year old low quality 747 that doesn't even have paneling? Mine is nowhere near as refined as this.
@randomusername The good thing is that 80% of the plane is calcuatedragfalse. That adds about 5 fps.
+1@randomusername Here's why so many rotators.
Landing gear- 9
+1Control Surfaces (Not flaps)- 4
Flaps- 19
Wingflex-6
Engines-4
.
42 Rotators/Pistons actually. (I included pistons because they have the same performance impact as rotators)
@JediWolf K then
+1Cool!
+1@TheChosenOne Oh you mean the killing a toyota series? That was impressive.
+1@randomusername thank you, will that fix the images not showing?
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/xTPJ41/F-16-Fighting-Falcon-V1-0
or
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8LW6a3/General-Dynamics-F-16-Fighting-Falcon
+1Why did I read the title of the article as: "Two die in S.U. 31 accident with train"
I legit thought that the train got hit by an SU-31
+1@TheLatentImage Alright, but what I'm really asking for is help. At the end of my post, I requested assistance in my overall product and timing.
+1Just follow the instructions I gave you. Don't forget that you can manually change the trim by rotating the horizontal stabilizers with fine tuner. It doesn't really matter what engine combination you use if you trim it correctly.
+1Alright. Just try to centel the middle engine along the plane's vertical center of mass as much as possible and make the engines with the same thrust. If the plane is still pitching down, you can always just rotate the Horizontal stabilizers a little up to correct it.
+1you can check out my 727-200 advanced. I don't know if you want to build a trijet with two engines in the front, or all three in the back like a falcon 9X/727. My 727 has engines of all the same thrust, and with the middle engine along the airplane's center of mass (vertically) as much as possible. I know you've already seen that, but here is the link for that:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/0s9DQd/727-200-Advanced
+1@F104Deathtrap sorry, don't know how to do that.
+1Wings could be reshaped a little, but this is great! Maybe you could add some more realistic gear using rotators.
+1@Sense2 yeah contact me on discord "klm747"
@GyatAirlines 9700K+1080ti+16gb ram
@Iceplane7965 what happened
Im glad to be a part of such an amazing aircraft! 69th upvote.
@Salah001XTripleVage thank you for your comment
@Yeetusyeee I was unfortunately never able to work out the floppiness of the gear, sp really doesn't like super complex weight-bearing mechanisms. Hopefully this is adjusted in SP2.
Just to let you know, the archer doesn't have elevators but instead has an all-flying stabilator. I fly one, if you need pictures for reference let me know.
@Sense2 real life flying
@Pooplee surely you can run a 3 year old build on modern hardware
@Sense2 At least I'm finishing my commercial license now
@TheSimplePlanesPlayer Work has completely paused for now, I'm doing a lot of real life stuff, working on CPL, tons more irl things to do
See you in 1 day like schmeckles
@Zaineman it's not a joke, that's fedex's phrase
Why does it say "the world on time" but is UPS?
@FlyingFish1 you fly or maintain them?
@ThatRandomCouchPotato 717 is still in development and will probably be released in 2024, waypoint system I can tag you on soon though.
Looks like a 767-200
@Simpleplanes897 Won't be out till 2024
@CaptFoxworth19 Nope, by request only (super busy atm)
The thumbnail is not what you built, it is much more detailed, what happened to all the details?
Looks quite nice!
@Sense2 It has the same wings, similar engines, my gear, and tail structure. there is nothing more complete than this... Also why do you want a 3 year old low quality 747 that doesn't even have paneling? Mine is nowhere near as refined as this.
@sense2
Here it is
@Sense2 the 747 was developed into FCCX's 747-300 Mahan air, which already flies.
@Planeboy134 if you make good planes they will be become popular and people will see them without you having to ask.
@Sense2 it sure was. Unfortunately I lost my (even older) blocky 737.
Are you okay bro
@linxiaofeng2339 just use Pitch and Angle Of Attack lol
@VerticalJunky the 717 will be N996AT
I would really love to see the MD-80 revamp, it's one of the planes that encouraged me to build more detailed.
You're welcome :)
@Sense2 it's activated now, this was 1.4 years ago
@Sense2 it's pretty good! I would love to see this old plane be updated to modern standards.
@HoshimachiSuiseiMyBeloved you can only tag 3ppl
@Sense2 btw here's the update and I passed my instrument
@realSavageMan I'm pretty sure he was talking about realistic slats