@CALVIN232 your story is amazing.and for me,the most amazing part is,in january,this year,i just assemble a spitfire model kit,a airfix's 1/72 spitfire mkIa.and i painted it to be"n9495 DW-K".so when i see the photo in the museum,i was shock,this is the real"n9495",and i meet its pilot's grandson!it is too good to be ture.but a short service history of this plane proof your said,i have to believe the coincidence happened.you can leave your e-mail if you want some photo of my n9495 model.
@CALVIN232 you mean a spitfire number 9495,code"DW-K"?It is a mk I,but if your grandfather were shot down in Battle of Britain,1940,it should be your grandfather's plane.
here is a proof"P9495 Mk1a – Arrived at 610 Squadron early June 1940. Flown as DW-K throughout June and July. Damaged in fight with 109 on 12.8.40 "
@CALVIN232 could you give me a link to the spitfire you said?just a photo in the museum is enough.i think i should build a replica for you and your grandfather.im really a spitfire fan,but it's my first time to hear a first hand story about the plane.if it is really a mkVII,it probably don't have the raf three colour skin,but a overral grey skin,which is easier to build.thanks for comment,and a big thanks for your grandfather.
@CALVIN232 in fact spitfire family are my most favorite planes,i especially like mkI mkIX mkXIV mk22 and seafire 47,and they are in my build list!but i don't have idea when do i start them.spitfire have very complicated shape,build a accurate spitfire isn't a easy work.i think i will start from a easist varient in the big family,i think my first spitfire will be the mk xvi.and then i can build other varients.
@cobalT i think at the first i build the wings like you said,but then i think the wings looks a little "fat".so i reshaped it and feel good,however you can still find problem,you really make me feel frustrate XD just a kidding.thanks for notice my friend,but to avoid making mistake is really hard.
@MrSilverWolf @FearlessFabEngineering @InternationalAircraftCompany @CRJ900Pilot @Tully2001 @Zerokiller3 thanks for like my plane!i'm so happy to share it!
@JoddyFubuki788 Oh.first,you need a pc client,it's very hard to do it in mobile client.and then you need to move some fuselages into your aircraft,as some "invasion strips".at last,find the "invasion strips" in the xml file,modify their length,height,and weidth for more accurate shape,and you can also change their mass scale to "0",so they no longer have weight.it's not easy to explain it,and my english isn't so good,i hope you can understand.
@JoddyFubuki788 uh.could you send a link to your saided pattern?i chose the skin because it got invasion stripes,as a symble of d-day invasion,and the famous red tail ,i think it is from the 332 squadron.
@Birdman492 well,im glad you have fun.and,uh...yeah i have to admit there are many bugs.....for it's my first sooooo little plane with sooooo many xml modified parts.and the bugs will be fixed soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP here is the modified engine:https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/196e98/modified-props
and the fixed I-16:https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ZQ4K73/I-16-type-24
now it can fly in mobile device,for a while,and explode when the phone get burdened.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP the size,horse power,the rpm.I think the problem should be the rpm,it may not run normally in mobile device.just now I remove the engine and the plane flys normally in my phone.thanks for the help again.I ll fix it up.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP I speak chinese.and im not sure too.but if i would make it mobile friendly i won't build so much details,such as flaps,and a radiator that really spins.less parts means less burden to cpu.but the real problem should be I use too much xml editing,that I really don't know what is the reason of the explode for sure.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP im not a good english speaker too,fortunately we can understand other.to make this plane run in mobile client,parts number should count less than 150,that means less details,and the shape will not so good.you can have a look at my fw190a,it runs perfectly in mobile.but as i got more skills in the game,i tend to build more complicated planes,and even a very little plane as a i16 have more than 240 parts.you reminds im playing a game named"simple"plane,not"complicated"plane.it's hard to find balance between simple and a good shape,but it really worth thinking.thanks mate.btw,i prefer la series fighter in warthunder,they perform pretty good in energy fight.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP it runs good in my pc,and just now i try to confirm whether it would explode in mobile,and,yes,it boom.it may because I scale parts too much by xml editing.besides that,parts are too many for such a small plane.Looks like the plane needs a good cpu to run normally.thanks for your advise,it really helps.
@FennVectorCWA I think most people don't like russian prop planes,they are less famous,and their green skin looks not good.
alsome, i like the twin-props!
@Bossman32034 sry,and the plane has some bugs in mobile device
@CALVIN232 uh...i sent the mail but seems you forget delete your comment here
@Zerokiller3 there is problem run this in mobile client
@CALVIN232 ok,now i ve have the photos of my n9495 model.you can post your email here,when i see it i ll reply you and you can delete it.
WOW!
@CALVIN232 im busy these days,i will reply when im free to take some photo
@CALVIN232 your story is amazing.and for me,the most amazing part is,in january,this year,i just assemble a spitfire model kit,a airfix's 1/72 spitfire mkIa.and i painted it to be"n9495 DW-K".so when i see the photo in the museum,i was shock,this is the real"n9495",and i meet its pilot's grandson!it is too good to be ture.but a short service history of this plane proof your said,i have to believe the coincidence happened.you can leave your e-mail if you want some photo of my n9495 model.
@longlonglong 是的 调整的东西可能会很多 其实现实里正常的静稳定的飞机都是低速低头高速抬头的 不知有没有办法直接改机翼升力系数就方便多了
@CALVIN232 you mean a spitfire number 9495,code"DW-K"?It is a mk I,but if your grandfather were shot down in Battle of Britain,1940,it should be your grandfather's plane.
here is a proof"P9495 Mk1a – Arrived at 610 Squadron early June 1940. Flown as DW-K throughout June and July. Damaged in fight with 109 on 12.8.40 "
@JoddyFubuki788deadline is octocber 28,i can't do that,sorry mate.
great work here
@JoddyFubuki788 could you reply a link to the challenge,im not sure whether im free to join it.
@ChaMikey long time no see,thanks mate.
@CALVIN232 okey,just tell me what the museum ,there should be some photo in net
脑袋沉多叠几层机翼就好了，到底叠几层看具体情况，相应的尾翼也要叠几层不然拉不动
@CALVIN232 you can try to copy the url in your phone web browser and paste it in the comment,whether this work?
wow i like it
@NordicTuna thanks my friend!
@CALVIN232 could you give me a link to the spitfire you said?just a photo in the museum is enough.i think i should build a replica for you and your grandfather.im really a spitfire fan,but it's my first time to hear a first hand story about the plane.if it is really a mkVII,it probably don't have the raf three colour skin,but a overral grey skin,which is easier to build.thanks for comment,and a big thanks for your grandfather.
awesome!
@CALVIN232 and mk22 isn't so hard to build too,yeah i think i can build a mk22 first
@CALVIN232 in fact spitfire family are my most favorite planes,i especially like mkI mkIX mkXIV mk22 and seafire 47,and they are in my build list!but i don't have idea when do i start them.spitfire have very complicated shape,build a accurate spitfire isn't a easy work.i think i will start from a easist varient in the big family,i think my first spitfire will be the mk xvi.and then i can build other varients.
wow,great
@cobalT just a kidding,critics are improtant for next build.but,well,i admit there a little frustrated,even i know it's a good notice xd.
@JoddyFubuki788 i can't do it at phone,sorry mate.im not used to playing a phone.
@cobalT i think at the first i build the wings like you said,but then i think the wings looks a little "fat".so i reshaped it and feel good,however you can still find problem,you really make me feel frustrate XD just a kidding.thanks for notice my friend,but to avoid making mistake is really hard.
@frostbite thanks !
@cobalT i checked it,it really looks not so accurate,but i think it is because the wings shape,it's hard to explain,and i won't fix it XD.
@MrSilverWolf @FearlessFabEngineering @InternationalAircraftCompany @CRJ900Pilot @Tully2001 @Zerokiller3 thanks for like my plane!i'm so happy to share it!
@JoddyFubuki788 Oh.first,you need a pc client,it's very hard to do it in mobile client.and then you need to move some fuselages into your aircraft,as some "invasion strips".at last,find the "invasion strips" in the xml file,modify their length,height,and weidth for more accurate shape,and you can also change their mass scale to "0",so they no longer have weight.it's not easy to explain it,and my english isn't so good,i hope you can understand.
@JoddyFubuki788 and,it is not so difficult to build the skin
@JoddyFubuki788 uh.could you send a link to your saided pattern?i chose the skin because it got invasion stripes,as a symble of d-day invasion,and the famous red tail ,i think it is from the 332 squadron.
@ronyseptian17 haha thanks!
I find it nearly impossible to take my own cockpit out,so here is my plane:https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Fev334/P-51D-mustang-11
excellent!
@Birdman492 well,im glad you have fun.and,uh...yeah i have to admit there are many bugs.....for it's my first sooooo little plane with sooooo many xml modified parts.and the bugs will be fixed soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooon.
well done
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP here is the modified engine:https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/196e98/modified-props
and the fixed I-16:https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ZQ4K73/I-16-type-24
now it can fly in mobile device,for a while,and explode when the phone get burdened.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP sure,i ll reply a link after I make it,as a unlisted post.
@Treadmill103 thanks mate,Im very appreciate that you like a plane looks not so fantastic lol.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP the size,horse power,the rpm.I think the problem should be the rpm,it may not run normally in mobile device.just now I remove the engine and the plane flys normally in my phone.thanks for the help again.I ll fix it up.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP uh,i guess the problem should be the xml edited engine.i ll try fix it up.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP uh..what cause the explode?
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP I speak chinese.and im not sure too.but if i would make it mobile friendly i won't build so much details,such as flaps,and a radiator that really spins.less parts means less burden to cpu.but the real problem should be I use too much xml editing,that I really don't know what is the reason of the explode for sure.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP im not a good english speaker too,fortunately we can understand other.to make this plane run in mobile client,parts number should count less than 150,that means less details,and the shape will not so good.you can have a look at my fw190a,it runs perfectly in mobile.but as i got more skills in the game,i tend to build more complicated planes,and even a very little plane as a i16 have more than 240 parts.you reminds im playing a game named"simple"plane,not"complicated"plane.it's hard to find balance between simple and a good shape,but it really worth thinking.thanks mate.btw,i prefer la series fighter in warthunder,they perform pretty good in energy fight.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP it runs good in my pc,and just now i try to confirm whether it would explode in mobile,and,yes,it boom.it may because I scale parts too much by xml editing.besides that,parts are too many for such a small plane.Looks like the plane needs a good cpu to run normally.thanks for your advise,it really helps.
@PanzerkampfwagenMausLP do you run it in mobile client?
simple but looks pretty good