"try the overload or fine tuner mod! size the wings to (0.1) on Width Length Hight, than put the wing in the fusalogeblock (so called costom wing)" @Diloph
@SimpleBoii its because im so rubbish with names. so i just name them prototype. thatway i can remember the number and now go fown searching Sky air Air [insert random name]
@Mustang51 again landing gear wont be much helpful and im too rubbish with custom gear so youre gonna have to do it. and ive tried paintjobs... and it went badly so the stock unpainted and white will just have to do
quite a nice tank. if any critics are to be told is the rear drive sprockets[Driving gear/wheels]. switching the Sprockets with the idler wheels to a front drive configurations would make it somewhat more accurate
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1Dj2m1/Type-76-Dev-Stage this was an early attempt and i wasnt really happy about it. i much prefer the wing designs i currently have
X-24 is an aicraft engine which was experimented on during ww2 as an attempt to get more power out of the planes. it wasnt that effective due to the additional weight and production priorities to just improving the V12s and Radial engines @Mustang51
a nice small plane with a rather twitchy handling. engine's could be improves and they akwardly look like sticks with propellers but overall its a nice plane.
is it silly to just fool with the idea of an A380 carrying a 747 carrying an a318?
im done with this...
"try the overload or fine tuner mod! size the wings to (0.1) on Width Length Hight, than put the wing in the fusalogeblock (so called costom wing)" @Diloph
@Diloph main ones 0.5 rear ones 0.1 so aye
@Diloph it was exactly that i tried. and thats the results. it was a try. i didnt like it so its all yours for all i care
@SimpleBoii i would have to rename alot of vehicles then
@SimpleBoii its because im so rubbish with names. so i just name them prototype. thatway i can remember the number and now go fown searching Sky air Air [insert random name]
i think its time to go back to the drawing board
....
@Mustang51 that would help
quite amazing! 10/10
+1@Mustang51 you expected a 5/10?
@Mustang51 probly further development.. just a probly. maybe a custom gear.... maybe
+1@Mustang51 ill leave and upvote and a 8/10
+1its something
+1now i wonder..... would he mig 21 look good with a delta wing design without any elevators infront or behind
+1@Mustang51 again landing gear wont be much helpful and im too rubbish with custom gear so youre gonna have to do it. and ive tried paintjobs... and it went badly so the stock unpainted and white will just have to do
+1quite an amazing job making that plane. tho i must admit i almost confused it for a fictional fighter. other than that. 10/10
+1maybe a little short compared to the irl version
quite a nice tank. if any critics are to be told is the rear drive sprockets[Driving gear/wheels]. switching the Sprockets with the idler wheels to a front drive configurations would make it somewhat more accurate
quite nice. looks like a small norwegian town
@emanuelga no worries
+1a big ol gun on a truck chassis. and with tracks. this wont have any issues
+2@Mustang51 good
@TitanIncorporated aye noice plane
+1you have made something?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Vulture @Mustang51
+1quite amazing
blimey thats something you dont see everyday
+1https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1Dj2m1/Type-76-Dev-Stage this was an early attempt and i wasnt really happy about it. i much prefer the wing designs i currently have
X-24 is an aicraft engine which was experimented on during ww2 as an attempt to get more power out of the planes. it wasnt that effective due to the additional weight and production priorities to just improving the V12s and Radial engines @Mustang51
+1@Mustang51 its ok. i try to make it simple but nice
+1@Mustang51 i havent based this on any irl planes
+1@Mustang51 ill try to add more landing gears
+1@Mustang51 im too rubbish in custom wings so that may not happen in the near future
@Mustang51 you can use the super charger
+1@Mustang51 well it was an attempt on an X-24 but people have their favorites. glad you liked it
@JolyLoly glad ye like it
@TJRyan because most of the time it slightly ruins the looks on the planes and im too shite with custom landing gear?
@TrislandianAlliance welp his problem
@JANoZIZKA thx
quite amazing. never seen such aircraft before
+1its a good thing its a jet. otherwise it wouldnt "suck"
~~i regret nothing~~
+1@MrPorg137 https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/iUG8pY/A7-Sentinel-I
maybe this can help?
not bad. tho i dont think that front of the tank really helps in mobility on harsh terrain
quite amazing. 10/10
9/10
quite nice
a nice small plane with a rather twitchy handling. engine's could be improves and they akwardly look like sticks with propellers but overall its a nice plane.
@Abhishek700 thanks