@TitanIncorporated no. i have had few ideas whether or not to get it.
@Mustang51 that would be something. tho i prefer the smaller designes due to the simpler ideas i can put on them. i may consider a large plane but that will probably be a while
@99807 alot of the prototypes werent uploaded. therefore most were lost during the breakdown. it does give room for a new line of planes. but i will try to recover atleast the sub assemblies
@Trijets just small modifications but it was a silly idea i had to try on someone elses plane and the Spiteful was the perfect aircraft for the experiment
honestly i hate the fact they retired it because of the peregrine engines. and even tho they could refit it with the merlins the engines were in short supply
a very amazing design. even tho i hate modern jets this one is quite cool
the guns are a littlebit too widely spread. other than that its good
+1@TrislandianAlliance since when was i american?
+1its impressive. still dont like it. but credit where credit is. its impressive
@TrislandianAlliance
teo: jokes about american plane
trislandian: confuses teo as american
+1there is not enough freedom to deliver! 0/10 would not recommend
jokes aside. great build
+1just fire a 17 pounder at the side and watch it go boom
its a decent craft
@asteroidbook345 its my first attempt on one
@Mustang51 opinion on experimental landing gear?
@CreeperOfTheFortress no worries. hopefully it will turn out great
@CreeperOfTheFortress basicly. if you have too much lift and the weight not balanced at the centre of the plane. it will go all over the place
@CreeperOfTheFortress its mod free. you would notice if it required mods as the site would automaticly show the mods used for the build.
the balance of weight is what keeps the plane flying
creative design. not often ye see a twinboom arrow design.
only the rear fuselage looks like a mustang. but ye get an A for effort. keep improving!
@TitanIncorporated no. i have had few ideas whether or not to get it.
@Mustang51 that would be something. tho i prefer the smaller designes due to the simpler ideas i can put on them. i may consider a large plane but that will probably be a while
@Mustang51 funnily enough if i try to make my planes larger, the design quality suffers. so large plane will mainly be reserved for bombers.
and the plane was based on the Boeing Model 394 carrier fighter which was a proposed light fighter for carriers.
@Mustang51 thx. tried a new cosmetic apporach
+1@Mustang51 there are other planes recently posted ye can take a look at
@Mustang51 its ok. all i did was redesign of engine, gave it contra prop and new guns.
@Mustang51 its trijets plane.
welp. time to work on a larger shipyard then
@Apolloww2 no worries. hopefully you will improve on planes
i dont want to be mr annoyance. but the fairey battle used a merlin V12. not a radial
@Hellosss38 by all means. yer free to do what ye like on the plane.
@scratch yer welcome?
@kimimayll TURBINE POWER! GENIOUS
+1stick a V8 on the bus and problem solved
+1if its electric. its bad
-teo
quite a cool design
+1just seing that. could ye do the twin engine version? of that one. just want to see what it would look like
looked more like a experimental heavy fighter
+1does it choose to show mercy or attack the enemy?
+2ooooo. cool design
+1@LockheedLover again. it depends on nations or airforces designation.
after all the C here could be Combat
@99807 alot of the prototypes werent uploaded. therefore most were lost during the breakdown. it does give room for a new line of planes. but i will try to recover atleast the sub assemblies
@LockheedLover im gonna have to ask how an italian fighter of ww2 is french. and again. different nation shad different designations.
@LockheedLover not much yer popping. nations over the times have had different designations and names. an example would be the C.202 folgore
@Trijets least more popular that what garbage i have made
@Trijets i think yer planes popular
@Trijets just small modifications but it was a silly idea i had to try on someone elses plane and the Spiteful was the perfect aircraft for the experiment
@Trijets
could i do some modifications to the spiteful? @Trijets
honestly i hate the fact they retired it because of the peregrine engines. and even tho they could refit it with the merlins the engines were in short supply
automatic Upvote. one of my fav ww2 planes
+1wow. a new post. auto upvote
@tjktjk11 wouldnt be possible. the fuselage would hold it back to 490mph.
+1apart from top speed its somewhat realistic
@SimpleBoii aye. somethings never change
@asteroidbook345 thx.
@SimpleBoii the simple designs? the no landing gears? the simplistic names because ye cant think of any?