i definitely agree with the torque one though. we should be able to change the ratio of rpms to torque. i do know that jamesPlanes sort of did it with FT code in an engine with some formula like: Pitch / GS
@Formula350 im not saying it's perfect, but as rexzion said on the uservoice, you can it's not that pressing of a problem as you can just take away the drag with xml.
@jamesPLANESii I don't know if others feel the same way, but personally I'm not sure how confident I am in their UserVoice system. :(
.
We only get a few points to distribute.
We can't (as I understand it) submit a Bug/Suggestion until you've reached a certain "rank", which I believe requires you using x-number of said points.
But worst of all is the shear number of submissions already, which makes me feel like anything I could offer would be lost in the noise. There's almost 1600 currently.
.
Primarily, with that last part, it's the lack of seeing any official comments on things there. Even if it were that it gets flagged as "Read by the Developer" it'd instill some confidence that what was submitted has at least been seen, despite not being acknowledged.
.
Oh, and this:
To help improve the overall quality of ideas, users are given a limited number of votes. Once ideas you vote for are closed, your votes will be returned to you.
Since they don't acknowledge and close suggestions, we don't get our points back. Since we can't get our points back, we have to remove them from what we've previously applied them to should we find something that we like more, regardless of whether we still feel the other voted-for ticket has significant merit.
.
Don't get me wrong though, I did my civic duty and spent all my points months ago, and commented on some issues as well. Of those I've commented on, I like these two (I'm the user C S): Overhaul the drag model Torque settings for car engines
Petition:
Socks
i definitely agree with the torque one though. we should be able to change the ratio of rpms to torque. i do know that jamesPlanes sort of did it with FT code in an engine with some formula like: Pitch / GS
@Formula350 im not saying it's perfect, but as rexzion said on the uservoice, you can it's not that pressing of a problem as you can just take away the drag with xml.
@jamesPLANESii I don't know if others feel the same way, but personally I'm not sure how confident I am in their UserVoice system. :(
.
We only get a few points to distribute.
We can't (as I understand it) submit a Bug/Suggestion until you've reached a certain "rank", which I believe requires you using x-number of said points.
But worst of all is the shear number of submissions already, which makes me feel like anything I could offer would be lost in the noise. There's almost 1600 currently.
.
Primarily, with that last part, it's the lack of seeing any official comments on things there. Even if it were that it gets flagged as "Read by the Developer" it'd instill some confidence that what was submitted has at least been seen, despite not being acknowledged.
.
Oh, and this:
Since they don't acknowledge and close suggestions, we don't get our points back. Since we can't get our points back, we have to remove them from what we've previously applied them to should we find something that we like more, regardless of whether we still feel the other voted-for ticket has significant merit.
.
Don't get me wrong though, I did my civic duty and spent all my points months ago, and commented on some issues as well. Of those I've commented on, I like these two (I'm the user C S):
Overhaul the drag model
Torque settings for car engines
@Sparky6004
I agree..? Parts being destroyed shouldn't just explode unless they have that potential. Empty fuselage definitely shouldn't explode.
Make a uservoice and add a link to it in the description
@ReturnOfJeffChandler true but i was wondering if anyone else thought it would be a cool idea
@WormsWithLegs it’s called user voice
Uh
Get a normal cannon
And shoot a default P-51 and watch it go light speed. If not I’ll just get a video and tag you with a link
@Nerfaddict
@Sparky6004 that's a problem?
@rexzion how about instead of just being personally nuclear-blasted after 1 single part explodes, you just actually take damage normally?
They are just fans of Interstellar @rexzion
how about making rotators not go srkrknt when your aircraft takes a bit of damage
That's actually a really cool idea!