@RestlessGalaxies I have nuance and style!?
News to me.
And block aircraft aren't particularly hard, at least so long as you don't get too ambitious. After all, they are what most people start with. This is a technically simple aircraft. It has no weapons or moving parts.
@Graingy if I really have to explain it, then some of your works show more style and nuance than others, this is a great example. The fact that you have a rather difficult task at hand and the first thing you decided to do is make something akin to a delta wing supersonic is something I don't think a lot of people would choose to do.
I for one, would likely do a long range attack fighter.
Adding to that, you also give off a bit of vibe of being fun, this too, is fun. Therefore, it's very something you'd make.. maybe 1 or, 2 other people would too as well.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 It also makes it seem a lot bigger than it is, I feel. Only ~30m long yet it feels enormous, in large part because it took ages to construct comparative to fuselage.
Part count is also easily the largest of anything I've ever prepared, so is performance cost I'm sure. Turns out fuel tanks both don't fill entire blocks (gap at the top) and have 2.4 times the performance cost of a block.
@Boeing727200F hopefully lmao
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Entirely classic construction, no Overload or part adjustment. No connection tool either. Not a piece of fuselage.
It's out!
Thief.
@RestlessGalaxies I have nuance and style!?
News to me.
And block aircraft aren't particularly hard, at least so long as you don't get too ambitious. After all, they are what most people start with. This is a technically simple aircraft. It has no weapons or moving parts.
@Graingy if I really have to explain it, then some of your works show more style and nuance than others, this is a great example. The fact that you have a rather difficult task at hand and the first thing you decided to do is make something akin to a delta wing supersonic is something I don't think a lot of people would choose to do.
I for one, would likely do a long range attack fighter.
Adding to that, you also give off a bit of vibe of being fun, this too, is fun. Therefore, it's very something you'd make.. maybe 1 or, 2 other people would too as well.
@TheMouse Thank you
@RestlessGalaxies So is any plane I make? I don't follow. I haven't made these before.
So beautiful and blocky!!!
@Graingy it's just a plane that you'd make
@RestlessGalaxies wha
@Graingy it just looks like a you plane.
... wait Mig you're already here lmao
I think I need to go to bed lol
@THEOKPILOT @SpiritDesignBureau
I forgot about the teaser tagging.
Go to my bio to opt out.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @windshifter1 @TheMouse
@RestlessGalaxies Wdym?
This thing is definitely Graingy.
T!
@Graingy ah
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 It also makes it seem a lot bigger than it is, I feel. Only ~30m long yet it feels enormous, in large part because it took ages to construct comparative to fuselage.
Part count is also easily the largest of anything I've ever prepared, so is performance cost I'm sure. Turns out fuel tanks both don't fill entire blocks (gap at the top) and have 2.4 times the performance cost of a block.
Mine's bigger, tho
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 For fun. It's an extra challenge. Figured I'd try it out after the other bozo did some weeks/months ago.
@Graingy why why didn’t you use fuselage
t
Finally, the martian decided to make something.
@Boeing727200F hopefully lmao
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Entirely classic construction, no Overload or part adjustment. No connection tool either. Not a piece of fuselage.
What in the ugly looking
T and are you going to post it?