@BaconEggs i really like that one! Very fast and effective

Ok! Can't wait to see it. :)

@Dllama4 Next Sunday, sorry. The wait is long, but it will be worth it.

Is this coming tomorrow?

@RedstoneAeroAviation Yep, Striker Eureka, first and last of the mark 5's.

Is this a jaeger? The australian one?

@BaconEggs ok

@MrMecha Err, yeah, two. They don't need to be replicas, but they need to be themed in a replicative manner.

1. Chinese themed mech, has to be a crimson-maroon color for primary, maybe add a tiny bit of white or yellow trim, it also has to have an inbuilt sword that extends from inside the arm, I'll get more details once I get a concept drawing if it in time.
2. Russian-themed mech, I want it to look more steampunk or low-tech than the other mechs, big flat surfaces, and it has to look like a tank, or something that's very powerful. I think a dark or olive green color with a small bit of red trim.

Give these some cool detail, like robot-esc stuff in between any plating, like a torso section or the arm connection. I want the feel of power with the Russian one, and swift and acrobatics with the Chinese mech.

@MrMecha Hmm, spooky stuff
Sure, good idea.

@BaconRoll they are attached then moved out while still attached to the joint origin. No, the nuc-payload won't be there, but the sting blades will be on LandingGear input to deploy.

@MrMecha Then my mech could just stomp on it if it was pissed off by your mech ;)

"Just hold on, Cherno, we're on our way!"

Geez, it looks good, but a few questions. Firstly, why are the arms floating? Secondly, will this mech have the nuclear payload on its back or arm-blades?

@MrMecha in ft all together?

@MrMecha Heh, so I was thinking about this in the shower last night, so what's the tallest mech you've built?
[Might not get a response in 7 hours if you respond in 5 minutes]

@MrMecha Well, a string of them. I can't imagine that's sturdy, because it would go right through the body wobbling and probably break itself.

@LatteCoffee55 Piston powered m8, of course you may have read that, it would be near impossible to use powered rotators since it would have more wobble and fluctuation in the leg joints.

@BaconEggs If you can make legs wich wont have powered rotators you must be god

@Externaldarkness Haha
It is real, I've put all the effort into that I could have in one airliner, the most important thing will be leg movement. Pistons, shocks, the rotators will be free-spin. It will be multi-input, VTOL, TRIM, and qweasd controls. It probably would break 100, but I'd be surprised if it passed the P-51 at highest rated. But hey, who wants to bet if it does?

How did you do that in the editor?

What's the part count on it so far? I'm going to guess 800 through 1,000 parts?

looks at screen half awake, looks agian, out of shock rolls off the bed onto the floor

The detail on that is incredible, the whole thing is incredible!

-Bloody hell
-Holy s**t
-Hot damn
-F-in amazing

only 2 words can describe this built

Whoa! That's amazing!