@Flightsonic yes, but it would be much easier to see it, and anyway, that's the system I use, most of the time one of the yaw pedals would get stuck, or some other bs, so just being able to zoom in and see it would be easier than going in a file and "fixing" something just to make it worse or do nothing

@MechWARRIOR57 When making realistic cockpits, it's so much easier to build moving parts connected outside and then nudge it in, and avoiding using scaled fuselages (colliders are wonky)

I love the idea of hollow fuselages. It'd make bombers a lot smoother and jsut all-around better looking. If you want my two cents, I think it's a great addition, especially for newer players. Why would it be a sin for someone new to the site to be able to make a clean aircraft with a working bomb-bay? Then, once they become more skilled, they can start using older methods to create more elaborate or custom hollow fuselages. I don't quite understand the stigma of "We can do it with (x) right now" when it's not like the addition of (x) in an easier system would out-mode the old way of making (x).

@Flightsonic yeah, personally I hate the idea of hollow fuselages, maybe a tool to edit connections in the editor (bc internal cockpits are a pain to make)

I agree, but I can see both sides of the argument @Flightsonic

@Rodrigo110 I hope it remains like that, adding a part for every "it's difficult to make" assembly just ruins the point of building them. And everyone has the part transform tool now, so it should be easier than ever

Oh. @deadlyspartan

True @denialofservice

@Rodrigo110 lowere part count =less lag

If you have the necessary skills you can make an interior right now, I like the fact that hollow fuselages don’t exist; it means that you need to have skill in order to create an interior

@Strikefighter04. I downloaded the mod but it won't let me run it for some reason

There is a mod for hollow fuselages, but I can see why you ask this.