It's kinda like comparing apples to oranges. Sure they both result in something that flies, but that's about all they have in common.
.
SimplePlanes provides a vast foundation of parts with incomparable customizability along with a variables menu which enables complex and interconnected systems, fabricated from obscurity. The build can be as simple or complex as one wishes.
.
Flyout reminds me more of SimplePlanes when it first came out. For example, the airliner cockpit can't be fabricated the same as in SP and comes as a pre-made piece (albeit with dimention scaling). And say I wanted to construct an LCD PFD from scratch using a text box and some blocks... also not an option in FlyOut, as it provides its own pre-made PFD. It feels to me like more of a "one-size-fits-all" approach, to use a phrase loosely.
.
Personally, I enjoy getting into the nitty-gritty, playing with variables to develop a functional fuel-transfer system, for example. FlyOut makes the process of putting something proper-looking in the sky a less sticky situation. Truly an apples to oranges comparison in my unimportant opinion. They both have something to offer.
Take Two is literally killing games tbh, first they turned Rockstar into a greedy company that just milks GTA Online, and now they killed off KSP 2.
As for Flyout, I don't really think it's gonna kill SP. SP is more simple (i mean it's in the name) while Flyout is more realistic
We gonna Bomb Jundroo Hq
For me, SimplePlanes still meant to be an S tier on my game tier list.
Cuz FlyOut can't run smooth on my mom's 1990 laptop.
@PlaneSpike thank you for the compliment! Btw it’s in the description
I’d say it’s literally just: Currently no. And probably never. No telling how Flyout will change in the future. Also good video btw.
@MAHADI Ok that's great to hear
@VinFage i'm way better than you can imagine XD
dude what is the music your using... Its so good!
@MAHADI are you good mate?
@VinFage that's your skill issue lmao
@MobileBuilder21 yeah simpleplanes definitely has a younger audience. Just read the app store reviews on mobile and you’ll see
Targeted to casual and younger players hence the title¨Simpleplanes¨...
Pov: The 500 hour Yamato
@fleia262 literally I said in the ending conclusion
It's kinda like comparing apples to oranges. Sure they both result in something that flies, but that's about all they have in common.
.
SimplePlanes provides a vast foundation of parts with incomparable customizability along with a variables menu which enables complex and interconnected systems, fabricated from obscurity. The build can be as simple or complex as one wishes.
.
Flyout reminds me more of SimplePlanes when it first came out. For example, the airliner cockpit can't be fabricated the same as in SP and comes as a pre-made piece (albeit with dimention scaling). And say I wanted to construct an LCD PFD from scratch using a text box and some blocks... also not an option in FlyOut, as it provides its own pre-made PFD. It feels to me like more of a "one-size-fits-all" approach, to use a phrase loosely.
.
Personally, I enjoy getting into the nitty-gritty, playing with variables to develop a functional fuel-transfer system, for example. FlyOut makes the process of putting something proper-looking in the sky a less sticky situation. Truly an apples to oranges comparison in my unimportant opinion. They both have something to offer.
@MAHADI I read it as “Weeds”
FYI this is SimpleWeebs now lmao
no
huh
the yellow adspot things are back
@Eggrypted homander 🦸
@gagagaga12457 more like ComplicatedEverything
deja vu
Fly out=difficutplanes
flyout is a lot more complicated and will offer a lot more customisation but simpleplanes is more approachable
@TTL yea
Take Two is literally killing games tbh, first they turned Rockstar into a greedy company that just milks GTA Online, and now they killed off KSP 2.
As for Flyout, I don't really think it's gonna kill SP. SP is more simple (i mean it's in the name) while Flyout is more realistic
@planesandgodzilla1954 fr