Profile image

BOEING Sonic Cruiser China airlines

99.8k UziDoorman  2 months ago
Auto Credit Based on UziDoorman's BOEING Sonic Cruiser China airlines

grateful@ Apollo018362Make a thumbnail for me

The Boeing Sonic Cruiser is a high-speed commercial airliner concept proposed by Boeing in 2001. The target cruise speed is Mach 0.95, close to the speed of sound, and is designed to shorten flight time. The design uses a unique forward-swept wing and tail design to reduce drag and improve efficiency. This model is expected to carry 200 to 250 passengers and is mainly targeted at long-haul routes. However, as fuel prices rose and airlines paid more attention to fuel efficiency, the development plan for the sonic cruiser was abandoned in 2002, and Boeing turned to the development of a more energy-efficient Boeing 787 Dreamliner to meet market demand for high efficiency.SC<em>2001</em>07b.jpeg
2024-10-28<em>221321.png
2024-10-28</em>220544.png
2024-10-28<em>220231.png
2024-10-28</em>214633.png
2024-10-28<em>214403.png
2024-10-28</em>214004.png
2024-10-28<em>213801.png
2024-10-28</em>212903.png

Spotlights

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.111
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.029
  • Wing Loading 22.2lbs/ft2 (108.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 4,651.9ft2 (432.2m2)
  • Drag Points 14666

Parts

  • Number of Parts 597
  • Control Surfaces 10
  • Performance Cost 3,622
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Extraordinary work

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    2,108 Numbers2

    This is an absolute floater down the runway abt 90knts IAS to be able to flare properly and land...

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    I am aroused

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Taiwanese airlines appropriation

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    28.2k Dragoranos

    within 2 seconds in china, a new chinese supersonic airliner, Dingchongdong DCD-11, is revealed, being strangely similar to the Boeing Sonic Cruiser.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @TTL I disagree. I'd say Fictional should be for things never intended to be built.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k tl

    @ComradeSandman if it wasn’t built, then it should be considered fictional.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    23.9k tl

    I’d love to edit this plane, but I my phone couldn’t take it

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Hot
    Though I don't think this should be tagged Fictional as it was a real concept

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @DeezDucks ok 👍

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    I’d like if your planes flies a bit more realistically than they do because a 777-300 taking off at 90 knots is unrealistic for a plane of that size…

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    Mod DeezDucks

    inch resting

    +8 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Blud got the tail of the Morgan

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image

    FAst

    +1 2 months ago