O-I was the name given to a proposed series of Japanese super-heavy tanks, to be used in the Pacific Theater. The vehicle was to be very heavy, and carry 11 crewmen. The complete history of the O-I is unknown, due to the "obscure" nature of the project and the limited documentation known to have survived post-war.
Management: Yaw and TRIM - control of the main tower.
Activation group (1, 2, 3) + TRIM - control of small towers
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 18.4ft (5.6m)
- Length 34.9ft (10.7m)
- Height 11.8ft (3.6m)
- Empty Weight 292,926lbs (132,869kg)
- Loaded Weight 295,393lbs (133,988kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading N/A
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 587
Parts
- Number of Parts 987
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 2,862
Required Mods
-
Tracks 2
by MOPCKOE_DNISHE
Version 0.81 (7/8/2019 6:07:15 PM)
View Mod Page
Where are the machine guns
I hate Tier 5 - 6 now >:(
@RussianAce Еврогейм?
это просто ахуенно
One is captured by the Australians
BREAKING NEWS: Today our armed forces successfully captured an example of the newest Imperial Japanese super-heavy tank. The vehicle has been put into service by the army and given a new name: the Operationally Intact, Conveniently Undamaged, and Nonrestricted Tank."
Войцман сосат кстати
On a sidenote, I don't think O-I would be named Type 100...
I checked the development of Japanese tanks, they are usually named after the year when the prototype was completed. For O-I this would be 1944 (Imperial Year 2604) or even later.
@RussianAS it's a joke ;) I dont speak russian either tho.
@Zippy6 what?? Its russian
это так густо!! Nice build
@Zippy6 странно, чертёж по которому я делал танк имел 6 опорных катков.
Very nice!
Incorrect number of suspension wheels. You have 6 here it should have 8. Dont know if broken but the little gun barrels didn't recoil. Recoil movement for the cannon parts is still present which is somewhat distracting. And what's with all the internal bracing on the inside of the turret?
could you make a mobile-friendly version of it? (also w/o mods)
@BogdanX uh, ok
@BogdanX Delete this post and download the corrected one?
Beautiful
Absolutely fantastic