I made a slightly more weaponized version of this check out my profile.

I would recommend a smooth cockpit instead of the standard. Besides that, great job!

@REW 嘘~~~

@realluochen9999 怎么突然膜起来了

@Hyperloop life time -1s per minute.....

@realluochen9999 be aware of being 续命

@PINK try translate this: 苟利国家生死以，岂因祸福避趋之.
Good luck!

@Deloreandude @PINK Narrow, shallow

@PINK yeah, i translated it when i first got it and that's what it came out to XD. Usually google translate doesn't work too well to say the least...

@PINK but it will be interesting if you can read, write and speak Chinese

@PINK complete different meanings

@2411181496 I guessing this is not what you said ?
-Google Translate . . .
Put your uncle fart, eyes long to ditch the Son Le wow, you fucking reporters from Taiwan, Hong Kong commentator mouth which will hear! I was not able to say F-15 MIG-25 is changed it.

@Hyperloop I am currently in the process of finding about Russian involvement in the J-20, but as Google Scholar is difficult to use . . . it will be a while . . . and the first link . . . oh, it is a PDF download.

@PINK What I am expecting is to find some authorized, non-deduced but proved files or articles, showing a direct link between J20 and Mig144/ Su47

@PINK Really glad you still have interest in this topic, However, the first link is not working, and none of the two other articles are persuasive enough to show that J20 was derived from Mig144 and Su 47, the only useful thing mentioned in these paragraphs is that the J20 combines various high tech aerodynamic designs from US and Russia planes, but never really give a strong evidence showing J20 is a copy of Mig144 and Su 47. You can deduce based on the facts, but never really prove your assumptions.

This find is also somewhat notable@Hyperloop

Next major find@Hyperloop

This is one of my first major finds@Hyperloop

@Deloreandude it takes time

@Deloreandude Thats a sad truth cuz they dont have excel engines and materials, but they are trying to make one

@Hyperloop I am using them as references into Chinese types, mostly to know their names before conducting research . . . I am not using Wikipedia or performance information.
It is a reference point, not the information that I will be using on the craft, that information will be forthcoming.

@PINK I am in class now and will check up the videos when i am back home, but as for Wikipedia, it doesn't even mention the development of j20, i do admit chinese developed fighters based on existed planes but how does this support you to claim that j20 is based on mig144 or su47

@Deloreandude I am about to do a quest . . .