Profile image

ABX-10 Flying Body Strategic Bomber

23.0k ColonelStriker  6.1 years ago

During a demolition of a Black Site in Nevada for the construction of Area 68 B, SFA Demolition teams were halted as the site is built with standards of the SFA Aeronautical Manufacturing and Testing Division. Luckily, the Black Site didn’t properly undergo full inventory cleanup. Along the undamaged site is an abandoned blueprint of a flying body aircraft simply labeled B-3. Seeing this as an opportunity to create a next gen strategic bomber, SFA-AMT Division quickly started to draft, design, and create the Assault Bomber Experimental 10. Using the fuselage itself to generate lift instead of large wings, the overall size of the bomber is greatly reduced without sacrificing payload or range. The only problem is that they have to reduce the speed to 800 mph at 1000ft to reduce the risk of stalling the aircraft due to small movements. The advantage is that it has a very low stall speed for its size and weight thanks to our secret quirks and gimmicks. Payload is standard Package B3-ACJS With unguided Heavy ordinance bombs and Light ordinance bombs, enough to cripple two airfields or factories.

——————[ Information ]——————
Date of first production: 2029
Origin Nation: Technically USA
Produced by: SFA-AMT Division
Weight (Fully Loaded): ~65,000lbs
Range: [Classified]
Max speed: 800mph @1000ft
Max Altitude: [Classified]
Stealth capable: No. Stealth Convertion Kits are available
Payload: Standard Package B3-ACJS, Capable of Standard Package XK-BOMN [ Nuclear Strike, 20 40kT Warheads ]

——————[ Controls ]———————

Standard Aircraft Controls

AG1: Light ordinance munitions

Spotlights

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.611
  • Wing Loading 9.2lbs/ft2 (44.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 7,207.0ft2 (669.6m2)
  • Drag Points 10806

Parts

  • Number of Parts 368
  • Control Surfaces 2
  • Performance Cost 2,312
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    16.8k redbear89

    Awesome..

    5.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    I may or may not have messed up the mirroring of the wing. That rolling while using trim is attributed to that. That’s a bugger @LegnaK

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k LegnaK

    Handling, stability, agility: 9/10 - I feel it rolls just a little too well? although not too much to dock a full point, however the other half comes from the issue that trim causes a roll.

    Realistic model and behavior: 9.5/10 - outside of the trim/roll issue? this aircraft flies very docile and is a overall grand aircraft to fly.

    Details, paint and other: 10/10 - The decals, markings, lights, and paneling all blend very nicely with the aircraft with nothing too distracting. fantastic work!

    Build quality: 10/10 - I normally say function over form, the ABX-10 nails both aspects near perfectly.

    Personal impression: 10/10 - everything about this aircraft is amazing, I don't know what else to say about it aside it's a masterpiece in my eyes.

    Description: 10/10 - very nicely detailed and fleshed out, feels like something that actually could happen.

    final score: 58.5/60

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Excellent aircraft! If I were to bet on which plane will win the competition, I'd bet on this one.

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.8k CrazyCatZe

    Wow....i LOVE that!

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    nice

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    beautiful!

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.3k Texasfam04

    Nice Job! Really like the look of this

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,109 JetFly

    In Russia with its funny names for military vehicles, this one will definitely be ABX10 Pirozhok (google translate the word пирожок)

    Why? Just because of Topol'-M artillery vehicle(Poplar-M)
    yep, this is strange

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.6k LegnaK

    Very nice!

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ClonelStriker +1 upvote 4 U!!! Nice build!

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,115 Boundslayer

    Pretty sweet!

    6.1 years ago