The Lockheed SR-71 "Blackbird" is a long-range, high-altitude, Mach 3+ strategic reconnaissance aircraft developed and manufactured by the American aerospace company Lockheed Corporation.[N 1] The SR-71 has several nicknames, including "Blackbird" and "Habu".
AG1: Start Engine
AG2: Parachute
AG3: Ejection 1
AG4: Ejection 2
AG8: Canopy
Trim=Trim
Throttle 94% Use Afterburner
Specifications
Spotlights
- This craft is curated
- Default4 1.2 years ago
- ReinMcDeer 1.2 years ago
- KingOfTypos 1.2 years ago
- RicardoACE 1.2 years ago
- AS49 1.2 years ago
- Aghsan22 1.2 years ago
- DDVC 1.2 years ago
- HOPKINS234 1.2 years ago
- MentallyDistorted 1.2 years ago
- Zero0Two2 1.2 years ago
- Bryan5 1.2 years ago
- AnomalyYeet 1.2 years ago
- Marulk 1.2 years ago
- RobertsAeronautics 1.2 years ago
- CrazyEngine 1.2 years ago
- DeadlyDialga 1.2 years ago
- Dissent3R 1.2 years ago
- Hahahahaahahshs 1.2 years ago
- LunarEclipseSP 1.2 years ago
- ToeTips 1.2 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 55.7ft (17.0m)
- Length 107.9ft (32.9m)
- Height 18.6ft (5.7m)
- Empty Weight 71,810lbs (32,572kg)
- Loaded Weight 177,122lbs (80,341kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.418
- Wing Loading 130.7lbs/ft2 (637.9kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,355.6ft2 (125.9m2)
- Drag Points 1298
Parts
- Number of Parts 480
- Control Surfaces 6
- Performance Cost 2,496
Requires high physics settings
I forgot to add something, the eject button. bruh
While taking off the ground the landing gear wings can't lift it up and got broken and explode
This is cool, all the decals are correct, I have a model that looks identical!
It does not fly
El tren de aterrizaje está bugeado
@WEEB k
@MrAviationguyideas Oh, that's so sad. In the future I may make a version with no more than 100 parts, but it's still just a concept. Please follow and wait to see.
@WEEB oh well my potato phone can only handle 1-50-100-200 parts that's all but this one is deadly to my potato phone
@MrAviationguyideas yes! At least for most people.
@WEEB is it mobile friendly?
Looks pretty but turn cycles are huge. On takeoff it noses down too much. Needs a way to lose speed effectively when in the air.
@Harada0919 thx
this is fantastic!!
@Eflitercplanes thank you
Love the work you did it is amazing
@WEEB completely understand
@Eflitercplanes It's hard to land, but I haven't been able to land successfully yet. And I can't test it. Because my phone isn't good enough.
When I pull back, it goes down
But also, the plane is not letting me take off
K thx
@Eflitercplanes Do you have high physics settings?
Why does the landing gear not want me to take off. As soon as I start moving, the landing gear breaks
Fast
How did I miss this ? Absolutely sweet build WEEB ! Z 🙀