Profile image

Antonov Izdelie 181

23.7k Onat67  3 days ago

Antonov Izdelie 181

– A Forgotten Soviet Experiment Brought to Life

The Antonov Izdelie 181 (Ukrainian: ????? 181, Russian: ??????? 181), sometimes unofficially referred to as the An-181, was a Soviet experimental aircraft developed in the 1980s. This aircraft was designed as a research platform to test unconventional aerodynamic principles, particularly the channel wing concept, which was originally pioneered by Willard Ray Custer in the United States.

Despite its innovative design, the Izdelie 181 project was ultimately terminated due to the economic collapse following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Only one prototype was ever built, bearing the registration CCCP-190101, and today, it is exhibited in the State Museum of Aviation of Ukraine as a testament to an era of ambitious yet unrealized Soviet aviation projects.

Design and Features

What sets the Izdelie 181 apart from conventional aircraft is its arc-shaped "channel wing", designed to enhance lift and enable short takeoff and landing (STOL) capabilities. This unique wing shape houses a propeller mounted within a semi-enclosed channel, which theoretically increases airflow over the wing, generating additional lift at lower speeds.

Other notable features of the aircraft include:
Side-by-side seating configuration – providing an ergonomic and collaborative cockpit environment.
Fixed tricycle landing gear – simplifying maintenance and reducing weight.
V-tail configuration – optimizing aerodynamics and reducing drag.
Engine-powered propellers via driveshafts and deflection gearboxes – an unconventional power distribution method.

While the channel wing concept was extensively tested by various designers, including Antonov, it never saw widespread adoption due to complexity and mechanical inefficiencies. However, its potential for high lift at low speeds made it an interesting experiment in the pursuit of STOL aircraft technology.

Performance in SimplePlanes

The Antonov Izdelie 181 has been recreated in SimplePlanes, allowing players to experience this forgotten aircraft firsthand. The in-game version stays true to the real-world prototype while ensuring a realistic and immersive flight experience.

Flight Characteristics in SimplePlanes:
• Max Cruise Speed: 390 km/h (Varies with altitude; given data collected below 1000m)
• Stall Speed: Slightly below 100 km/h
• Takeoff Speed: 150 km/h

With its low stall speed and efficient lift characteristics, this aircraft is capable of stable flight at low speeds, making it a unique addition.

Controls

• AG1 > Canopy
• VTOL > Trim
• Trim > Flaps

Cockpit Modeling

The cockpit has been carefully recreated based on available reference images, though due to low-quality sources and my limited Russian, I could not make every switch and gauge fully functional. However, I have included several working gauges that I was able to identify from images, along with a functional canopy lock for added realism.

The Fate of the Antonov Izdelie 181

Despite its promise, the Izdelie 181 never entered mass production. The collapse of the Soviet Union halted numerous aviation projects, and this experimental aircraft was one of the many casualties of budget cuts and shifting priorities. The sole prototype remains preserved in Ukraine, serving as a reminder of the bold yet unfulfilled visions of Soviet aeronautical engineering.

Now, with this SimplePlanes recreation, you have the opportunity to fly and experience the Antonov Izdelie 181 in a way that was never possible in reality. Try it out and let history take flight once again!

NOTE:

In some images you can notice both beacon ligths on the primary wings are same color. I fixed them after taking photos.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 49.1ft (15.0m)
  • Length 44.0ft (13.4m)
  • Height 14.8ft (4.5m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 8,834lbs (4,007kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.152
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.452
  • Wing Loading 54.7lbs/ft2 (267.3kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 161.4ft2 (15.0m2)
  • Drag Points 3472

Parts

  • Number of Parts 700
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 3,408
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    23.7k Onat67

    @SilverStar
    Why are trim and flaps reversed on this build?

    Great question! This was a necessary adjustment to ensure that the visual control surfaces match the actual aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft in SimplePlanes. Here's how it works:

    Technical Explanation:

    1. Hidden Wings & Structural Covering:

      • Like many builders, I covered the wings with structural parts for a more realistic appearance. The actual lift-generating wings are hidden beneath.
    2. Control Inputs for Pitch Adjustment:

      • The horizontal stabilizers (at the rear) control pitch and can be adjusted by both the trim slider and the main pitch input.
      • The flaps (on the mid-wings) are normally controlled by the VTOL slider but also affect pitch slightly, much like stabilizers do.
    3. Flap Lift vs. Trim Lift:

      • On most aircraft, flaps generate more lift than the Trim of horizontal stabilizers, but in my build, the horizontal stabilizers actually produce more lift than the flaps.
      • To match the expected movement, I assigned the trim function to the visual flap covers (fuselage which looks like a flap), so they move when the trim slider is adjusted, giving the illusion that the flaps are responding to trim.
    4. Reversing the Controls for Realism:

      • Since my aircraft's trim (horizontal stabilizers) has a greater aerodynamic effect than the flaps, I assigned the trim adjuster to control the flaps visually while the VTOL slider adjusts the stabilizers.
      • This way, what you see on the aircraft matches how it actually behaves aerodynamically, creating a more immersive and realistic flight experience.

    Final Note:

    I originally tried switching the technical control inputs (instead of the visuals), but it didn't work correctly. So, I adjusted the visual control assignments instead. The end result? The aircraft behaves correctly while also looking accurate!

    Pinned 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    150 Alper53

    Eline saglik kral

    +1 13 hours ago
  • Profile image
    25.8k Rob119

    "Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter" ahh plane

    yesterday
  • Profile image

    It's really a nice and sweet plane, I hope you become more popular in the future. I wish you continued success.

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k SilverStar

    @Onat67 Thank you for your very precise reply. As I said, you made a great build.
    However, the sentence "but it didn't work correctly" implies a skill issue. What I want to say is that, if you are reversing all the Trim inputs by VTOL (and VTOL by Trim) correctly, there shouldn't be any problem. Having them in a more conventionnal command configuration would have made a more instinctive flight experience for the players :)
    And as you probably understood, the basic problem is the sizing of your wings and control surfaces. But that's up to you to think about it in your next builds.
    You can still improve so your builds will be even better.

    +1 2 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.4k Graingy

    Oh, that's pretty

    2 days ago
  • Profile image
    16.5k SilverStar

    Interesting. Nice build
    I don't really see any advantage in switching the VTOL with the Trim...

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    Smol ahh AN-225.

    2 days ago
  • Profile image

    i would've never guessed

    2 days ago
  • Profile image
    6,531 JBPAviation

    Nice!

    3 days ago
  • Profile image

    The local air museum by me has the original Custer CCW5.

    3 days ago