Profile image

FJ51 "Seahorse"

82.8k SimplyPlain  4.3 years ago
Auto Credit Based on TriStar's (Fictional only) Battle of Midway Challenge

BACKGROUND

In parallel with the development of the P51 "Mustang" in response to the British Purchasing Commission's requirement, North American and Supermarine worked together on a version which would serve on the British carriers, as a much needed replacement for some of the ageing open-cockpit biplanes still serving witht the Fleet Air Arm.

The cooperation was a success; North American's engineers, who were responsible for the great Mustang design, were complemented by Supermarine's experience with Schneider Trophy racers and, of course, the Spitfire. The requirements were many; the airplane should be comfortable in as many roles as possible. At the very least, it should be able to serve as a fighter as well as a (dive) bomber and attacker and -if at all possible- should be able to carry a torpedo as well, although the latter requirement was a nice-to-have rather than an absolute must.

The result was the "Seahorse", basically a slightly stretched Mustang airframe with the ability to seat a crew of 2 in a very cramped cockpit, and powered by a Rolls Royce Griffon driving two contra-rotating propellers.

ARMAMENT

In its several roles, the Seahorse can be equipped with a variety of armament. For this particular build;

  • 4x 12.7 mm Browning machine guns in the wings
  • 37 mm M4 autocannon with 30 H-ET round magazine, firing through the propeller hub
  • 12x 5" FFAR's
  • a single 500 kg general-purpose bomb

FLYING

Planes that are designed to do everything will rarely excel at anything -and the Seahorse is no exception. It could have been a great fighter, but because of its "multirole" design is outclassed by many other, more specialized planes.

Taking off with a full complement of weapons is a tricky business. The plane would have benefited from a tricycle landing gear, but was designed as a typical taildragger instead. Don't use full throttle to accelerate on takeoff; give it some flaps and elevator trim and go with 50% throttle, using the rudder to keep the plane going straight on the deck or runway. Just before rotating, throttle up to 100%.

In flight, there are few surprises; the plane will handle like a brick until it has released some or all of its weapons load, but will then turn into a quite nimble, properly quick fighter.

Landing, again, can be challenging -experiment with throttle and flaps for best results.

Controls:

  • AG1 drops all the FFAR's without firing them
  • AG2 for the landing hook
  • VTOL down for flaps
  • Trim slider for elevator trim

Happy hunting!

Spotlights

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.39
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.206
  • Wing Loading 28.8lbs/ft2 (140.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 336.2ft2 (31.2m2)
  • Drag Points 1927

Parts

  • Number of Parts 644
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 2,152
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    1,971 SirRhyvs

    It's nice, but tilts to to the left. (can you fix that?)

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    Total 39.9

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    Ratings
    9.9/10 Aesthetics. Love it, although 0.1 points deducted because horizontal stabilizer wingtip is a but rough

    5/5 Weaponry Realism. Self explanatory

    5/5 Marketing. Love the thumbnail

    (August 3rd, suggested by Bearclaw) 20/20 Resemblance to real aircraft (will it work in real life?) Good work, especially on the drag points etc

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,450 Flewey

    @AcePilot118 Mhm.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,750 AcePilot118

    @MajorSix the seafire first flew in 1942 and it used a griffon engine, so it’s basically a more American version of the seafire

    Edit: I just realized that I’m about 2 months late

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,450 Flewey

    @SimplyPlain I can’t tell weather you’re being serious or sarcastic, so I’m just gonna quietly lmao over in this corner.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    82.8k SimplyPlain

    @MajorSix yeah, go figure... a '39 engine in a '42 plane. Pure magic.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,450 Flewey

    Nice plane though.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,450 Flewey

    Just one question: WTF IS A GRIFFON DOING IN A PLANE FROM 1942!?

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    Nice! A plane from the American side

    4.3 years ago