Tu-104 in CSA Livery
Functional night time windows
Inside the cockpit
Controls
-AG2.........................Reusable Parachute
-AG3.........................Pushback
-AG5.........................Hold Heading
-Landing Gear.........Landing Gear and Landing Lights
-VTOL.......................Flaps
-Trim........................Trim
Features
-Functional Placeholder cockpit
-Working Instruments
-Ceskoslovenske Aerolinie Livery
-Pushback
-reusable parachute
-WingFlex!
Note
I once thought would be the most complex and frustrating project would turn out to be most exciting project I dared to replicate, and in good time I built this magnificent Soviet Craft, though by no means any safer than the Comet, because I made a reusable parachute with the intentions of installing it on the Tu-144.
However it was too late since it was uploaded weeks before learning about the parachute. So I kept it for another opportunity like this one. And I figured no one would like it because of the lack of physics that once the plane stops, it still hangs in the air, I tried to fix that but since I'm no Funky Trees Witch, I cant be arst to do so.
This plane takes of at around 277km/h, and cruises at around 550km/h at some 1000m, and stalling speed is 230km/h with full trim, however it is not advisable to fly in this realm as it is a angled wing, unlike a delta, it stalls a lot faster. Be careful pilots.
As you may have noticed, its flying under a CSA or CSA, or Ceskoslovenska Aerolinie Livery, well that is because most other offerings are offered in Aeroflot livery, and I wanted to do something different, and could be fun replicating almost impossible liveries. just like BEA and Qantas Il-62.
Clientwork Queue
-Jetstar
-He177
-GW-05 Churchill
@asteroidbook345
Specifications
Spotlights
- GrizzlitnCFSP 4.6 years ago
- Trainzo 4.6 years ago
- BaconAircraft 4.6 years ago
- asteroidbook345 4.6 years ago
- MisterT 4.6 years ago
- Tang0five 4.6 years ago
- BowtheAvali 4.6 years ago
- NoGoCars 4.6 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 7 airplane(s) +68 bonus
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 113.3ft (34.5m)
- Length 131.7ft (40.1m)
- Height 39.9ft (12.2m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 61,236lbs (27,776kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 4.403
- Wing Loading 26.6lbs/ft2 (130.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 2,298.8ft2 (213.6m2)
- Drag Points 29755
Parts
- Number of Parts 637
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 2,728
As a Czech I love this thing
THANK YOU, GREAT JOB!!! 👍👍👍👍
the wing is looks like tu16 badger...
I really liked this plane I found it very beautiful and it is great to control and to land congratulations
literal i made the generic verion and no one like it
Dont worry you wont suffer updrafts!
谁还记得1958年的10月18日,当年中国代表团就是坐这架飞机出空难的，机上80人无人生还，我们永远也不会忘记这一天
当年的飞机编号:CCCP-42362
@Belarussian Я вот русский правда самолеты не делаю
Ты русский?
hey man good job update it for 1.11 it will be successfull
This kinda reminds the of the 114
@hhjun 你们已经不用图-16了吧[滑稽]
I used this bad boy on a flight from Avalanche to Wright. During the flight, another plane which I built collided with me from underneath....
Isn't that coincidental?
轰6改（确信）
@jelybaca
How would you feel about making a B2707?
(Americas supersonic jet that never happened)
TUPOLEV IS DOMINATING THE FRONT PAGE THIS WEEK!
Cool plane, only the Nope gear Goes to fast up
Actually, your wing area is pretty accurate lol. Sorry about that.
Pretty good!
Flies like it’s on rails a bit though. The wing load is too low. You have too much wing area. If you want it realistic, just trace the wings and make the functional wings the same shape and size as the real wings at 1:1 scale. People really underrate the wing physics in this game.
Also, I can fly this going up at a 60 degree angle quite easily. It has a bit much thrust, and a bit much drag. Try reducing them both.
What you can do to get it accurate is set the mass of the plane and the amount of thrust the real life plane has to the same thing, then reduce the drag to get the right top speed.
Nice
Ah, yes, Russia. Rely on superior human eyesight rather than radios or maps. @jelybaca
@asteroidbook345, Forgive me for being harsh earlier, I really prefer for my projects to be a surprise after the Comet flop. And my initial assessment of the tu-114 fuselage is wrong, it is similar fuselage diameter, I guess you are right. Now of course since some people now know what I will publish next, the livery will be the least you will expect, to keep the surprise factor. He will not fly under Aeroflot's colours, or might.
@Shippy456, Its for navigation
I wonder why Russian commercial airlines in the 1950’s - 60’s has nose windshields.
@jelybaca It would be great to see a He-177! You never fail to amaze me with your posts.
@jelybaca I’m wondering if you can make the Dornier Do X flying boat.