Profile image

S6A1 "Silencer"

10.2k Falken  4.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Falken's S6A1

Hello ........I'm back for ....no reason? Anyway~~ this plane have heavily mixed with so many different kinds of craft's feature which has been made in WWII. But why I'll came out the idea for this budy? I think~~~ It's just for fun! And .....

9k Celebration!!!

Before all of this, I need to give a huge thankyou to @BogdanX end @EternalDarkness. The landing gear's input to make it open and close function normally, I referenced the inputs you did so I realy appreciate you both.

Controls:

AG1: Arresting Hook
AG2: Deploy Boom50
AG3: Deploy Boom25
AG4: Detach rockets
AG6: Fold wings
VTOL: Flaps down
Trim: Adjust angle of attack

Design:

1

This craft was designed as a Multirole Carrierbased Aircraft for the fist time. And because of the speed problem of the aircraft, they decide to make a counter reverse prop for increase the thrust. About the cannon at the center of the engine, it's because the bomber's armor at that time is too thick for machinegun to penetrate, so they built a 30mm cannon to take the job for that.

History:

(the history is all made by fictional so it's not real)

In 1938, the Japanese started to make a cooperation with British to design a next generation carrier aircraft for multiple purpose. But when the Japanese started the invasion of Pear Harbor, the project stopped. Then when the blueprint was sending back to England in 1941, the German captured the blueprint and start to continue design the craft. But after the Normandy Landing, the blueprint fall into American's hand. Then the project was finished by Republic Aviation in 1945. So when the plane was built, the war has finished and it has been produced twice at the time.
2

Screen Shots:

3
4
5
6
7

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor S6A1
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 41.2ft (12.6m)
  • Length 35.9ft (10.9m)
  • Height 14.3ft (4.3m)
  • Empty Weight 10,844lbs (4,918kg)
  • Loaded Weight 18,502lbs (8,392kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.728
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.521
  • Wing Loading 23.3lbs/ft2 (113.7kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 794.8ft2 (73.8m2)
  • Drag Points 9481

Parts

  • Number of Parts 557
  • Control Surfaces 2
  • Performance Cost 2,053
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    10.2k Falken

    @Mustang51 That's a J2M Raiden reference though~~~

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    Great looking aircraft! Quite a unique looking engine on it

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @Falken
    I wasn't, I was just informing someone that the wyvern didn't just have a turboprop engine.
    Great aircraft btw, looks real nice

    +1 4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.2k Falken

    Well~ that was a Wyvern reference though @JediWolf ~~

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.2k Falken

    Don’t be that serious @ND40X . The engine type doesn’t matter because I don’t care that much at the first time. But hope you enjoyed it.

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.2k Falken

    Imagination is creativity @WagonRestorant .
    And~~~this is a game instead. Don’t be that serious. The thing that matters is the game experience instead just being realistic ~

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    A gun inside the radial engine... It is impossible because of its construction

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    That was the Wyvern S4, just look it up. For example, the only surviving Wyvern has a piston engine. (Go to Wikipedia)
    @JediWolf

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,986 JediWolf

    @ND40X i thought the wyvern used a counter-rotating turboprop configuration confusion 100

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @JediWolf
    Well, not entirely like a Wyvern S4. There were Wyverns with piston engines and not a turboprop engine.

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,986 JediWolf

    @Falken turn rate of a Zero and looks like the Wyvern S4 hhmmmmmm I wonder what went on in between

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    42.8k Trainzo

    Very nice plane . Great job and nice screens .

    +1 4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.2k Falken

    @Tang0five Sorry about that~~ Because I take Mitsubishi Zero as a reference for the mobility. But ..... maybe it's too over for that XD..

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    53.2k Tang0five

    This is beautiful, pitch is a little strong - I’d maybe inclined to tune it down a little. Great stuff though!

    +1 4.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.2k Falken

    @Freerider2142 Thanks ! That's what I'm working for.

    4.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Flies as good as it looks :)

    +1 4.6 years ago