MiG-21F-13 Fishbed-C
The MiG-21F-13
I actually wanted to make a somewhat later version of the ’21, but decided on this one for the challenge… early versions of the MiG-21 are considered 2nd generation fighters, but later models are decidedly 3rd generation. The MiG-21F-13 (NATO: Fishbed-C), introduced in 1960, was the first MiG-21 model to be produced in large numbers with 513 built in Russia and another 194 built under licence in Czechoslovakia.
What’s to tell about the MiG-21? The plane is so well-known it needs little introduction. The MiG-21 was the first succesful Soviet aircraft combining fighter and interceptor characteristics, achieving Mach-2 with a relatively low-power afterburning turboject in a lightweight package.
Although a hugely succesful design, the plane does have its drawbacks. Like many interceptors, the MiG-21F-13 had a very limited range. Its delta wing, which is fine for a fast-climbing interceptor, meant a rapid loss of speed in dogfights and not-so-great (well, non-existent) manoeuvrability at low speed. Still –in the hands of a capable pilot, the MiG could easily outperform most of its contemporaries; it was all a matter of tactics, and using the MiG’s power, speed and high-G ability advantages to the maximum.
To emphasize its success: variants of the MiG-21 are still in use in some 20 countries around the world, although many will probably be retired this decade. Not bad at all, for a design from the fifties.
The build
Not the best or coolest looking MiG-21 on SP, and it doesn’t have the most special features. What it does have;
• Realistic weight & fuel -no idea about the actual handling, since obviously I don’t really have a MiG-21 in my backyard
• Custom landing gear and air brakes (AG1). Like on the real ’21, the rear air brake is locked when carrying an external fuel tank on the centerline hardpoint
• Movable nose cone, in 3 positions like on the early MiG-21’s
• Pitot probe folds when parked
• Automatic additional intake vents at the nose
• MiG-ish half-cockpit -more to have a nice cockpit viewpoint rather than for actual functionality. It’s far from complete, and the dials & gauges are certainly not in the right place. Still, it helps to give the plane a better look and feel
• Too many useless details
• Typical Soviet (lack of a) paintjob
• External PTB-490 fuel tank (can be dropped with AG2) to make the plane’s range just a bit less terrible
• Automatic changeover (speed-related) from nosewheel steering to rudder
• Auto-afterburner @ 95% throttle. Don’t use it too much though, or you’ll run out of fuel in a matter of minutes.
Controls
The MiG-21F-13 is from an age when jets weren’t too complicated. AG1 for air brakes, AG2 to drop the external fuel tank, AG8 to toggle lights. All other controls are standard. The below explanation of cockpit instruments may help -although I seriously doubt it ;)
Armament
The standard weapon of the MiG-21F-13 is a single Nudelman-Rikhter NR-30 autocannon. The NR-30 is a single-barrel, short recoil operated cannon –essentially an enlarged version of the older NR-23. It fires massive projectiles of 400g each at a muzzle velocity of 800 m/s, but the plane carries a very limited ammo supply. A single hit is usually enough to cripple or destroy an opponent, but with only 60 shells it’s no weapon for triggerhappy pilots. Short, controlled bursts are the key. Like the plane itself, the cannon isn’t intended for extensive dogfighting.
The MiG-21F-13 was also able to carry 2 of the the new Vympel K-13 (NATO: AA-2 “Atoll”) short-range, infrared homing air-to-air missiles. The K-13 is basically a reverse-engineered AIM-9; in fact it was copied so well that AIM-9 and K-13 parts were interchangeable, and either combination would still work. The K-13, therefore, has exactly the same specs as its AIM-9 counterpart -in this case, borrowed from WarHawk95
This build has the standard NR-30 cannon and two “Atoll” missiles. Although the MiG-21 could also be equipped with weapons for ground attack (e.g. standard FAB-100/250/500 bombs, HVAR’s etc.), I focused on the interceptor/fighter version; the ’21 is simply not much good as an attacker. For that, best download my Su-17 “Fitter” instead.
HAVE FUN…
Specifications
Spotlights
- TMach5 3.9 years ago
- AWESOMENESS360 3.9 years ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 23.2ft (7.1m)
- Length 50.1ft (15.3m)
- Height 13.9ft (4.3m)
- Empty Weight 12,072lbs (5,476kg)
- Loaded Weight 17,295lbs (7,844kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.898
- Wing Loading 13.3lbs/ft2 (65.2kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,295.5ft2 (120.4m2)
- Drag Points 2272
Parts
- Number of Parts 1291
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 4,034
Required Mods
-
_Mechanical_Instrumentation
by Gestour
Version 1.0 (3/18/2019 6:06:03 AM)
View Mod Page
Airfoil is kind of weird, you should use the triangle technique.
Hey... I was building this for MAHADI's cold war challenge...
@Revan13152 nope... the mod is cosmetic only, to make the cockpit view a bit more realistic.
@SimplyPlain Does it work without mods? I know how to load it without mods on mobile but without the mods does it impair it’s functionality?
@MrACEpilot I hate "camo" in SP... there's no possibility to use textures, so all attempts to make a camo pattern look like absolute sh* -nothing cool about that. Even a simple two-tone paint scheme adds quite a part count, and it will still look like crap. Silver may be boring, but it's also the standard livery of these planes...
@F104Deathtrap I wouldn't call the MiG-21 -or any other old Soviet plane, for that matter- technologically less advanced than the US equipment. A different design, resulting from a different mindset, but no less effective. But you (and Moltke) are right; no battle plan survives contact with the enemy. The US planes and pilots were at least every bit as good, but the people calling the shots were not too bright...
Your russian series just keeps getting better, hot damn
@F104Deathtrap
Very interesting info!
@F104Deathtrap
so you're not criticizing my people? cool
@SimplyPlain Yes and no. A good pilot will almost always determine the outcome, but tactics, doctrine and equipment played a heavier role than usual over Vietnam. NVAF pilots depended on Ground Intercept Controllers to plot effective routes to ambush incoming bombers (much like the RAF over England during the Blitz), these radar personnel were instrumental to their success. On the other hand, US pilots suffered heavily as a result of being issued long-range weapon systems but given standing orders demanding close-range encounters, poor, often repetitive attack planning and inconsistent goals. An interesting divide between pragmatism and politics that cost many lives. The United States allowed hubris to minimize a considerable technological advantage, whereas by sticking close to their intended purpose, the NVAF was able to maximize the impact of their fewer and less sophisticated fighters.
I like this
@F104Deathtrap true -only, in this case size doesn't matter. A missile hit from a small plane is just as deadly. Back then, it all came down to how good the pilots were.
This is the same variant on display at the National Air and Space Museum in Virginia. It's parked right next to it's two greatest rivals, a F-105D Thunderchief and a modernized F-4J Phantom II. The Mig is tiny by comparison, and you can really get a sense of the David-and-Goliath struggle that transpired between these planes over Southeast Asia.
@SimplyPlain
1265??!!?? OMFG!!
@KnightOfRen 100..? Lucky you. I have 1265, and no list or filing system LOL it's a small miracle I can find anything at all...
@SimplyPlain
XD, I must have at least 100 subassemblies
@EternalDarkness Credit added... I really even had no idea where these originally came from; I must have at least 3 or 4 different AIM-9's (or Atolls, if you will) in my ridiculously long list of subassemblies.
@EternalDarkness
This post can stay up, right? Just curious
I understand that you have taken the missiles, modified them a little bit, and then used them without credit for the sake of realism, as that's how the real K-13s came to be, but a few letters stating where they came from wouldn't have ruined the effect too much.
@WarHawk95
lol
Idk what to do about this
Thank you for creditting my AIM-9Bs.
That was very cash money of you.
Hmm, I don't know. But in Warthunder the mig is waay more maneueverable and just dominates. The F-4E can hold its own though I think.@KnightOfRen
I love the lines and details awesome!
Another amazing plane as always ;)
Hello I'm doing a little shame less self promo I have built a bunch of planes give me sugegtions anything you'd want