Profile image

AF-55B 'Adelaide' (15 Parts)

7,281 EasternPatrick  2.8 years ago
106 downloads
No Tags

Manual Credit Based on Walvis' AF-55B 'Adelaide' (39 Parts)


62% less parts


I built this thing to push my capability of how i can build functional thing with the least part. somewhat of an upvote machine, if you will. But contradictingly said, don't upvote this, it won't make my day better, upvote my other build instead please for the love of God

7 parts version here

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 5 airplane(s) +158 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 32.7ft (10.0m)
  • Length 29.5ft (9.0m)
  • Height 9.7ft (3.0m)
  • Empty Weight 3,940lbs (1,787kg)
  • Loaded Weight 4,782lbs (2,169kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.409
  • Wing Loading 18.8lbs/ft2 (91.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 254.0ft2 (23.6m2)
  • Drag Points 1696

Parts

  • Number of Parts 15
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 209
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    auto credit wont work, based off from @walvis ' AF-55B 'Adelaide' (39 Parts)

    Pinned 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.1k tl

    @EasternPatrick lmao 15 parts

    1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @QuesoAirlines I did it in 3 and 4 but mrcopty did a 0 part

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    77.3k MrCOPTY

    @S1lly I Do It

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    77.3k MrCOPTY

    @EasternPatrick I Make A Zero Parts Version.

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @UserP194 😿

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    480 UserP194

    No, I will upvote this.

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    300 S1lly

    @EasternPatrick 0 part plane😈

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    do it in 10

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    218 Melogi

    @EasternPatrick where da problem at 😈

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Melogi best I can do is 7 before the plane becomes completely unrecognizable

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    1 part

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    its becoming more and more crappy

    +5 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TRD6932 Yes

    +1 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    11.9k X99STRIKER

    lol

    +2 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    85.4k Walvis

    @EasternPatrick For autocredit you can tag a moderator and ask them to change it. :)

    +3 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,605 Sergio301

    Bruh

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Melogi i could but i think it will be unflyable

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    218 Melogi

    How about a 5 parts AF-55B >:]

    +2 2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,341 TRD6932

    So is this like a trend now to make the original aircraft as mobile friendly as possible?

    +5 2.8 years ago