Profile image

Me-262 (modified)

10.4k Bullozeee  1.4 years ago
Auto Credit Based on OPaiTaOn's Messerschmitt Me 262

Im being too bored and decided to make this

This is an alternate version of future me 262 in 1952, where it have the earliest guided AtGM

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Messerschmitt Me 262
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 40.4ft (12.3m)
  • Length 35.6ft (10.9m)
  • Height 12.5ft (3.8m)
  • Empty Weight 15,606lbs (7,079kg)
  • Loaded Weight 19,740lbs (8,954kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.581
  • Wing Loading 50.2lbs/ft2 (244.9kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 393.5ft2 (36.6m2)
  • Drag Points 1700

Parts

  • Number of Parts 367
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,625
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    A-262 Tiger

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    35.6k Graingy

    Wow.
    A-10 Me 262.
    You have just made that overlapping region between reformer and Wehraboo very happy.
    ngl it does look cool tho.
    Would run in terror from it.

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    MA-10

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Bullozeee The changes to this aircraft are already done. I've just got to work on something else also in the video.

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.4k Bullozeee

    @SoloMemePixy That's alright, tell me when your video is done

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Bullozeee Hey, I'm trying to make a dumb video that includes this aircraft but with stupid changes. That alright with you?

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    this is the v1 of me 262s

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @Bullozeee sounds pretty cool!

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.4k Bullozeee

    @Mustang51 Im thinking to make more fictional german aircraft in a german ww2 victory scenario. So its like fictional wunderwaffe

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @Bullozeee maybe time for ME-262 (modified), 2, the sequel

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.4k Bullozeee

    @Mustang51 You're right though, but unfortunately its too late i posted it already

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @Bullozeee fair but I think it would be worth it to just get rid of the gear system and make it no clip into the fuselage especially since this is a modification of someone else’s build

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.4k Bullozeee

    @Mustang51 I actually wanted to move the wing to the back, but that means I have to move the whole gear systems so I keep the wing there

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.2k 210100

    ME-10 wildschwein

    +2 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    @SPAircraftOfficial I did not know it was designed based on the R4M! You learn something new everyday. Still would be nice to have them on here in A2A too

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Mustang51 About the R4M:
    Yes, it was an Air-to-Air unguided rocket. after the war, The Americans developed the FFAR Mighty Mouse, which was based on the R4M and had a similar purpose (FFAR = Folding Fin Aerial Rocket)

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.5k Mustang51

    Honestly pretty cool alterations although I have a feeling the wings would have to be brought way back for how tail heavy it would be in real life, like with any rear engine mounted plane. Also correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t the R4M designed for air to air usage?

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,670 Gomboo

    Me 10 germanthog

    +1 1.4 years ago