Messerschmitt BF-109 TL
35.1k AdlerSteiner
6.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on AdlerSteiner's BF-109 G6
Requested by ThePrototype. this baby is as fast as the 262, you might be familiar with this plane if you played world of warplanes. well, i didn't find this there. i found this while looking at the variants of the 109 in Wiki. and same paint scheme with a little liveries from WoWP. so...enjoy! -AdlerSteiner
Specifications
Spotlights
- FlyingThings 6.6 years ago
- TheGuyYouMightKnow 6.6 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor BF-109 G6
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 53.1ft (16.2m)
- Length 39.5ft (12.0m)
- Height 14.4ft (4.4m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 13,141lbs (5,960kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 10.773
- Wing Loading 22.4lbs/ft2 (109.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 588.0ft2 (54.6m2)
- Drag Points 7599
Parts
- Number of Parts 412
- Control Surfaces 12
- Performance Cost 1,373
@AdlerSteiner Those are my engine nacelles
@Kazin thanks m8
@AdlerSteiner Copy that!
@ZwillingerLuftfox46 hmmm...i'll think about it.
@AdlerSteiner Actually, can you make a BF-109-Z1? I was trying to do so myself, but it wasn't going too well.
@AdlerSteiner dont listen to them, they are just jealous because your planes are high quality.
I might go with fictionals from now...@Mostly
Yeah. Apparently people keep criticizing of how this is the millionth 109 in here... @Mostly
You already made 7 other 109s, is this going to be the last one?
Meh @Othawne
Bit lame on the nose there, A Simple remake of the nose cone would've done it.
Oh ok. @TheGuyYouMightKnow
@AdlerSteiner Yeaaaaahhhh... still not sure, I'll try to finish it this weekend but unfortunately no guarantees.
I’m looking forward onto it
Thanks! Btw when’s your 109 gonna be released? @TheGuyYouMightKnow
Extra neat my dude!
Why the hell the photos not loading?!
Well that was an interesting concept @ThePrototype
Well they actually took the body of a BV-155 and used it and took some Elmements from the 109
@ThePilotDude and there was the TL born.
Yep@HistoricBirds
Its like a 262 and 109 combined
@hushkex might try...
Pls make a 262
It’s ok. No problem! @AdlerSteiner