@CommanderIKEA agreed.

@16 Its the best way to improve in stuff imo, as long as its not perfect its not the real deal. If i take a look at my builds from when i started a year ago i feel embarassed cuz they are pretty dookie.

@CommanderIKEA let’s be honest dawg, we may share a quality; but mine is in art. It’s being a perfectionist man. You feel like your stuff is never like it, or doesn’t fit right, so you refuse to call it the plane.

I loved the S-3 Viking, you've earned a new follower

@Pan yeah. They both are tho-

@AshdenpawTG22 sir that is an S-3 Viking

The cutest C-17 ever

@CommanderIKEA Oh no worries at all. Again, this one is more detailed and accurate in terms of resembling the S-3 than most other attempts here - all of which need to be honored, though, as this a criminally underappreciated and really quite awesone plane!

@Krikkit42 thanks, i would have called it an S-3 replica but the landing gear doors, the bomb bay and the canopy arent quite perfect

This would have every right to call itself an S-3 replica since it is, in fact, better than most S-3 replicas on here. Nice job!

Looks odddly familiar

beauty plane! nice work

@Olegsandr its an S-3 viking at home not an a6

@Johnpork yes just make sure to give credit

Could i use this build and rename it to S-3 sea viking?