Profile image

he heinkel 111 desert camo

121k belugasub  5.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on belugasub's HE heinkel 111

this is the fixed version, you still have to use vtol to get the gear up but it flies better and at a more accurate speed. i also changed the camo because i think it looks better like this.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor HE heinkel 111
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 84.4ft (25.7m)
  • Length 56.0ft (17.1m)
  • Height 17.9ft (5.5m)
  • Empty Weight 24,044lbs (10,906kg)
  • Loaded Weight 30,446lbs (13,810kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.295
  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.065
  • Wing Loading 34.7lbs/ft2 (169.3kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 877.8ft2 (81.6m2)
  • Drag Points 17281

Parts

  • Number of Parts 544
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 1,569
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    215 fridolin

    @EternalDarkness thanks for showing us caveman all of this new technology!

    5.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,239 Loopy200

    @EternalDarkness what the heck dude stop hating on him! Lol just kidding, I learnt something from your comment too, thank you!

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @belugasub Sorry to say this but, the HE-111 only had 2 torpedo's, not 3... Good work either way! :D

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    iT's a RePoST yOu jUSt PaINteD IT

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,986 JediWolf

    @belugasub RIP BRAIN!........ MEDIC!

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    Im just gonna get rid of the (fixed) part in the name cause it’s not really much different xD @JediWolf

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    *breaths in slowly, Pauses for a few seconds, bangs head on table @JediWolf

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,986 JediWolf

    @belugasub still forgets tail wheel

    me: AHAHAHA! :D

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @belugasub no problem. I'm glad to have helped.

    +1 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    Thanks! @CRJ900Pilot

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Cool!

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    Thanks! @Destroyerz117

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    this is glorious

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    Let’s just say they fell off when the plane was flying... @WarHawk95

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    I’m tired now shhh xD @WarHawk95

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    Thanks for the tips, I downloaded the overload mod but was cluesless in how to use it so your feedback will help a lot.

    I do admit that the end of this project was quite rushed resulting in lots of details being missed.

    I will probably continue To build like this since i don’t always have time due to exams and stuff

    Anyway thanks again for the feedback!
    @EternalDarkness

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.9k WarHawk95

    AND THE WING TIPS ?!?

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    38.7k ZetaAvalon

    @belugasub
    This one will be buried with upvotes trust me

    5.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    With all the teasers, I was expecting a lot more from this build. Hopefully, a bit of feedback will help you improve your technique.

    1. Landing gear opens and closes with VTOL. You're on Windows, and thus capable of using XML editing. Easiest way to edit XML is Overload mod. Use this list to find inputs you need. For gear, it's "LandingGear" and min value "0".

    2. No flaps. Dude...

    3. Control surfaces are moving through fuselage blocks. Even stock wings are a better option than that. I think I've already linked you to the easy way to make good wings. If I haven't before, I have now.

    4. No tail wheel. How can we steer on the ground without tail wheel?

    5. No bomb bay. With paneled fuselage, I was really expecting a bomb bay.

    6. Performance are close to a biplane fighter, but even more extreme. Very tight turning radius, extreme acceleration, and high roll rate. You can reduce acceleration while maintaining max speed by reducing both drag and engine power until you get correct climb rate.

    This is my opinion. If you enjoy building more basic builds like this, I don't have a problem with that. However, you can do much better with just a bit more effort.

    +10 5.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    not expecting any upvotes since i already posted this plane but it would be appreciated

    5.6 years ago