(Update) Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner American
424k realSavageMan
5.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on realSavageMan's Boeing 787-8 American New
A minor update on my previous 787-8: stretch of the fuselage and added texts.
AG1: lights
AG2+Brake: revere thrust
AG7: release fuel
Enjoy
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Boeing 787-8 American New
- Successors 6 airplane(s) +43 bonus
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 198.6ft (60.5m)
- Length 206.1ft (62.8m)
- Height 59.3ft (18.1m)
- Empty Weight 263,739lbs (119,630kg)
- Loaded Weight 487,432lbs (221,095kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.484
- Wing Loading 54.2lbs/ft2 (264.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 8,989.1ft2 (835.1m2)
- Drag Points 33246
Parts
- Number of Parts 992
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 3,580
Me when see 992 parts only:
(insert vibing cat gif)
the most realistic 787 in this site
@TheSavageManZ will there be the 787-10?
@QingyuZhou I suggest you to use a piston on the gear as a shock absorber, that way the landing will be even more realistic.
Look at this A320's gear for example: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/UgLv7K/TSAD-A320-AirFrance
can you make a tutorial on how to make custom landing gear?
It always amazes me on how you can make things so, realistic
@QingyuZhou Can you make the engine more thrust and let air brake and reverser Active without brake ? (Just change Input To Active1,2,3) Make a new update and share.
Np @QingyuZhou
Thanks! @ACEPILOT109
hot
BeSt plane ever
@LeHieu000111 Use Overload mod
how to make the engine more bigger??
Almost two months. @Viper3000ad
Wow fantastic cockpit ! what a pity I can not spotlight it , how much time did it take ?
Ikr haha, feels great
@GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD
Ha ha, you now have more points than your most hated rival.
You know what, the biggest issue in my opinion is that the wings’ shape is not correct. Other than that this plane is perfectly fine :) @YourWife
@PointlessWhyshouldi I am
You need to pay attention to your plane losing 2 wings but still fly
i love it
@QingyuZhou
boeing 787-9 is longer than 787-8
are you on high physics @YourWife
Here we go again
Pros:
Cons:
Overall this isnt too bad, just has some details to be worked out.
@iLikePancakes
Thank you so much