Profile image

Messerschmitt Bf. 217 "Wolfhound"

4,449 Shippy456  4.8 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Shippy456's Messerschmitt Bf. 217 "Wolfhound"

”The Wolf, is the pilot... not the plane. The [jet] is merely the teeth and claws.”

-Abelard Watserhiem, Head of the “Wolf Pack” project.

Controls:

Basic flight controls
Trim for pitch trim
Basic weapon systems
Gear for gear and flaps
Group one for afterburner
*Brake for air brakes *

Features:

-High detail
-Mobile friendly
-Simple features
-Excellent flight handling
-Heavy firepower
-Motorized and balancing bombsight (courtesy of @SnoWFLakE0s)

History (fictional):

The “Wolf Pack” project was initiated in 1942 due to the recent release of the P-38 Lightning. At the time, the P-38 was dominant in the skies due to it’s forward nacelle mounted cannons. Tuning wing guns to collide at a certain distance wasn’t an issue. It was just literally point and shoot. The Messerschmitt aircraft corporation decided to pounce on this immediately, and “improve” the P-38’s design. Production and testing was long and costly, due to the experimental nature of their jet engines. It has to sit around 3 1/2 feet behind the cockpit, including a heavily warped intake system to compensate. The prototype of the Messerschmitt 262 crafted the forward nacelle for the Wolfhound, practically, leaving enough room in the bottom for a explosive repeating cannon. And so, in November of 1944, the Messerschmitt Bf 217 Wolfhound was introduced to the German air armada.

Stats:

 Top Speed (service ceiling): 1150mph
 Top speed (sea level): 555mph
 Armament: x2 Blaziarch bombs
 x2 AG-14 Rocket Pods
 x4 Forward mounted cannons
 x1 Zietrighst Repeater cannon
 x1 Mk 6 torpedo

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Messerschmitt Bf. 217 "Wolfhound"
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 47.0ft (14.3m)
  • Length 31.6ft (9.6m)
  • Height 12.5ft (3.8m)
  • Empty Weight 8,441lbs (3,829kg)
  • Loaded Weight 21,122lbs (9,580kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.127
  • Wing Loading 83.2lbs/ft2 (406.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 253.7ft2 (23.6m2)
  • Drag Points 4397

Parts

  • Number of Parts 231
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 1,081
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    I forgot to mention: (I’m stupid) land CAREFULLY. I recommend approaching the runway level to it, and landing at about 290. Anything less and the plane will get unstable. The front landing gear is touchy.

    Pinned 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456
    1. Yes I am a mobile player.
    2. Have fun with my creation.
    3. Leave any feedback in the comments.
    Pinned 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    @AWESOMENESS360, sorry about that. If I tuned it for more pitch, the bounciness in the pitch became insatiable.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Shippy456 I mean that when I try to pitch up or down it barely moves that much, and is slow to climb

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    559 Megaphone

    WOW

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    153k RussianAce

    @Shippy456 )

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    YES! FoR THE FIRST TIME In ALmOsT A YEAR I HAVE BROkEN 20 UPVOTES!! ThANK YOU @RussianAS
    (Edit) that’s not true. I just looked and my previous upload actually broke it XD. Still exciting tho.

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    What do you mean by that? @AWESOMENESS360

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is really cool! But the pitch isn’t exactly the best though. Or is it, and I’m just doing something wrong?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Np!@Shippy456

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Cool! Thank you! @Hedero

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    105k Hedero

    Oh yes of course, the aircraft looks incredible and has a really nice amount of detail.@Shippy456

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    @Hedero thank you! Any feedback?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    @BogdanX
    @randomusername
    how’s this?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    SQUARE UP BOI.

    Jk. @ChisP

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    44 Mangled

    @Shippy456 I built an airframe. I wouldn't suggest doing that due to the sheer amount of work involved and issues you will encounter, but it's is a somewhat satisfying thing once you finish it. In the end, it all comes up to if you have the time and dedication to finish a large project.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Hmmm. I’ll think about that. @Mangled

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.9k ChrisPy

    Jealous 😂

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    44 Mangled

    @Shippy456 Maybe try doing something different. You have already developed majority of the skills needed to be a great builder. That's what I did on my old account.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    @Omel how do you spotlight?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Heccing hecc. Am I just impatient or do my creation never get many upvotes? What am I missing?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Consider this my application. @FranzPeterSiegfried

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Hmmmmm. @FranzPeterSiegfried

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Is that a challenge? @FranzPeterSiegfried

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,449 Shippy456

    Thanks @Omel !

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments