Profile image

F-111A Aardvark

68.6k Homemade1  3.6 years ago

The General Dynamics F-111 Aardvark is a retired American supersonic, medium-range interdictor and tactical attack aircraft that also filled the roles of strategic nuclear bomber, aerial reconnaissance, and electronic-warfare aircraft in its various versions. The word "aardvark" is Afrikaans for "earth pig" and reflects the look of the long nose of the aircraft that might remind one of the nose of the aardvark. Developed in the 1960s by General Dynamics, it entered service in 1967 with the United States Air Force. The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) also ordered the type and began operating F-111Cs in 1973.

The F-111 pioneered several technologies for production aircraft, including variable-sweep wings, afterburning turbofan engines, and automated terrain-following radar for low-level, high-speed flight. Its design influenced later variable-sweep wing aircraft, and some of its advanced features have since become commonplace. The F-111 suffered a variety of problems during initial development. Several of its intended roles, such as an aircraft carrier-based naval interceptor with the F-111B, failed to materialize.

USAF F-111s were retired during the 1990s with the F-111Fs in 1996 and EF-111s in 1998. The F-111 was replaced in USAF service by the F-15E Strike Eagle for medium-range precision strike missions, while the supersonic bomber role has been assumed by the B-1B Lancer. The RAAF was the last operator of the F-111, with its aircraft serving until December 2010.

Control:

VTOL= Swing the wing
The rest is normal flight control

Reference pic:

1

1

ingame Pic:

1

1

have fun

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 8 airplane(s) +49 bonus
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 44.5ft (13.6m)
  • Length 54.3ft (16.6m)
  • Height 13.2ft (4.0m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 18,027lbs (8,177kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.739
  • Wing Loading 70.1lbs/ft2 (342.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 257.3ft2 (23.9m2)
  • Drag Points 886

Parts

  • Number of Parts 211
  • Control Surfaces 3
  • Performance Cost 1,211
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    390 Relevance

    @A380Qaterair I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic lol

    4 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Relevance wait fr?

    6 months ago
  • Profile image

    This thing sucks at take off

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    0 Koko11

    @Homemade1 plss make this for carpet bombing

    1.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    390 Relevance

    @BadAtGaming13 lol the f-14 came after this plane

    +1 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    the only plane to have it's flyby sound recorded and put in the "golden disc"

    +2 1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Random04 I’m pretty sure the Hellkeska is a SU-24 Fencer

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    381 V1thebomb

    No Capsule Eject?

    +2 2.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    F-14 2.0 isn't real, it can't hurt you.
    F-14 2.0:

    2.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    the Swept wing needs a fix but overall great job you simplified this aircraft model and part count beautifully.

    3.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,709 Random04

    @Souka i think you should make bigger wings.. Make it bigger and scale it down.. Because when the wing is fully swept it doesn't really lift

    +1 3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,709 Random04

    Doctor: Real life hellkeska isn't real.. It can't hurt you.

    Real life hellkeska:

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    68.6k Homemade1

    @WhistlingDeath14 oh yeah...its the bomb who hit the main fuselage when you swing it fully

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is pretty good but I moded the 2 back engines and put the power multiplier back to 1 instead of 0.15 and it fixed the speed performance and when rolling it sounds like some parts don’t have the collision response turned off through mods cause parts start to break otherwise tho good job

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    this is pretty good ngl

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.4k Kangy

    @Souka Nah it's all good, common mistakes. Just try to get the top speed accurate

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    68.6k Homemade1

    @Kangy so now im lacking of power...i usualy get to much power but now im lack of it..alright

    +1 3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.4k Kangy

    After some test flights, I decided this deserved the upvote, it's got a pretty good flight model, although, I must admit, when the wings are swept, the flight performance isn't realistic at all
    The top speed is lacking a lot at low altitude
    But the good parts are all there! The swing wing at first, amazing work on that, props to you. Secondly, the part count is amazing, pretty sure you're the only person on the site who can build a plane with such a low part count with a cockpit outline.
    All I recommend is to work on the flight model, it'd make your aircraft stand out for me and many others

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Souka you've been shadow banned

    +2 3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @KnightOfRen oh

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    How are you alive? Do we even know if you are dead or alive?

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    48.8k EngieWeeb

    Good, clean, simple. Needs trim control but that's easy to add in myself. Beautifully well done at such a low part cost. :)

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    42.8k Trainzo

    Very nice build . Great job .

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,357 LBAereo

    very nice work!! like it bro' !!

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.1k ALTMTR

    McNamara would be proud

    3.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments