No Tags
Auto Credit Based on pura's MC202e1p
Sorry for the kinda low quality thumbnail :>
Henlo people!
I present you my most recent Simple Replica, this time my first of an Italian plane!
(Sorry, i couldnt quite make the asymetry Or however you spell it of the wings, so its not 100% acurate)
I included some Nice details:
The rear gear retracts
Exhausts
And some more
Controls and how to pilot
1-VTOL-FLAPS
2-All of the other regular controls
3-use the flaps for take off, other wise the nose Will for some reason down a litle
4-also use flaps for Landing, it makes the plane very stable until around 190km/h where it starts kinda Stalling
5-for Landing, use full flaps, and some Trothle, expect it to Spin a litle
HAVE FUN!
Some screenshots!
Specifications
Spotlights
- FoxtrotCharlieCharlieX 3.8 years ago
- Stormfur 3.8 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor MC202e1p
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 34.5ft (10.5m)
- Length 28.2ft (8.6m)
- Height 10.9ft (3.3m)
- Empty Weight 6,587lbs (2,988kg)
- Loaded Weight 7,187lbs (3,260kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.16
- Wing Loading 38.3lbs/ft2 (186.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 187.9ft2 (17.5m2)
- Drag Points 1939
Parts
- Number of Parts 237
- Control Surfaces 7
- Performance Cost 807
@pura affirmative 07
@chemmey its kinda of a small palne, when i tag you it should have around 190
@pura No worry. But how much parts is it?
@chemmey il soon release a unlisted version of my upcoming build, probably will release it 8 hours from now, can i trust and tag you on that unlisted build so you can give some feedback about the flight model? thanks!
nice job
@chemmey thanks for the feedback and tips ^-^
@pura I've flown it. I agree with Alex9000. It's actually pretty bad. Am I here to say you're bad builder? No.
So let's start with the overall performance. When I opened up the CoM n CoL. I've noticed that it so close together. This causes instability issue.
Next, we have the pitch wobbling issue. I know how to make this gone. Perhaps I could help you with this kind of issue. For me this pitch issue is pretty critical. Pretty much making the plane uncontrolable in terms of pitching. The pitch effectiveness is a nightmare. As the real aircraft itself, quite maneuverable.
After that, the drag. 1.9k is quite a problem. If you actually take a look of my Hien, I tried to keep it below 1000 points. Not just you can get more realistic acceleration with the exact engine power, you can improve the actual performance too!
Last but not least, wing loading. 186kg/m² is pretty much a flying brick. You'll have trouble making it fly perfectly. My advise is keeping the wing loading for such aircraft below 110-120kg/m² would be sufficient to harness the true behaviour of this flying beast.
I'm sorry if this comment hurt your feeling. I'm not here to that. Just a bit of what I've gained during months of experimenting. That's it. Hope this could help you my komrade :D
Also if you have a bit of an issue with plane being stubborn, tag unlisted. I'll try my best to help :D
Have a great day sir!
Whatda mean you mean low quality thumbnail? The picture takes up the whole space, it’s well lit and isn’t smothered in text. I say good job!
Well at least you try your best
spaghetti
@Alex9000 but yes, i do agree that the flight model could BE better, but i never seem to get it right
@chemmey @LeonardorHD1 thanks!
@Alex9000 whats you physics setting?
This is hard to say but I am gonna be honest: It looks good but it handles real bad
hot
Nice