Profile image

Boeing 2707-300 V2.0 (READ THE DESCRIPTION PLEASE)

15.9k Vidal99977  5.9 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Vidal99977's Lockheed L-2000

This is the fixed (very, very, very, very, very, very close) Boeing 2707-300

The Boeing 2707-300 is back!!!! She has came in with new adjustments and a new livery.

READ THIS PLEASE.
* The tail does not have yaw because of it being so, it makes the tail bend a lot and make the plane go BOOM!!
* PLEASE DO NOT MOVE THE PLANE UP/DOWN TOO MUCH! IT WILL MAKE THE HORIZONTAL AILERONS BEND, AND THE PLANE WILL GO BOOM!
* And yes, this plane is mobile-friendly.

Hope you guys enjoy and understand the limits on this plane. Hope you guys upvote it! Thank you all.

Group 1= Activates the parachutes

The Boeing 2707 was the first American supersonic transport (SST) project. After winning a competition for a government-funded contract to build an American SST, Boeing began development at its facilities in Seattle, Washington. The design emerged as a large aircraft with seating for 250 to 300 passengers and cruise speeds of approximately Mach number 3. It was intended to be much larger and faster than preceding SST designs such as Concorde.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Lockheed L-2000
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 280.5ft (85.5m)
  • Length 167.0ft (50.9m)
  • Height 28.6ft (8.7m)
  • Empty Weight 50,484lbs (22,899kg)
  • Loaded Weight 149,808lbs (67,951kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.9
  • Wing Loading 40.5lbs/ft2 (198.0kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 3,694.4ft2 (343.2m2)
  • Drag Points 19779

Parts

  • Number of Parts 210
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 1,143
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    Also BTW, If you guys wanna see my Youtube Video of this plane's first flight, then here you go: https://youtu.be/-uE6p5uUP4Q

    I really failed to land this plane XD. Also, some Enemy plane did a mid-air collision with me too LMAO.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    BTW guys, Sorry if the plane diagrams just above here are very unscaled. For some unsuspected reason, it glitched and the planes all came out like that. I apologize for that inconvenience. :)

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    Thx ;)

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    No problem mate, you deserve it! @Vidal99977

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Nice link. Does not show airfoil design or engine concept, from the aft. But I get the idea: both are SST concepts. @Vidal99977

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Vidal99977 OK, but no argument really. I worked on both Lockheed and Boeing projects. Lot of prototypes. That's all folks!

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    @Stingray let's stop arguing ok? It's just a plane. A SST plane.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    @Vidal99977 Neither did the L-2000 mockup. Aero planes maintain an active prototyping function.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_2707

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    And BTW, This Boeing 2707 was actually real. It's just that you may have not heard about it because it never flew. @Stingray

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    @Stingray It really isn't like that.
    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/l-2000-pics.htm

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.4k Stingray

    Comment: the Concord nose up/down idea has fascinitated the SP community for years. It's no longer a current aerospace concept. For the record the Lockheed tav build looked more like this:

    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/s614k3/Lockheed-SST-tav-L-2000-v1-2

    What you've got here is a "Boing something". which looks good. flys well! Keep on building.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    NOTE TO EVERYONE I WILL MAKE ANOTHER VERSION WITH NO CHANGES BUT A NOSE THAT CAN ACTUALLY GO UP/DOWN LIKE A CONCORDE'S. I WILL RELEASE THIS VERSION SOONER OR LATER.

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    @HunterColombia Thank you so much for your upvote! :)

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    @MSGamezYXZ360 I might use that advise. Thank you for your advise! :)

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.9k Vidal99977

    @MrHeadshot2693 thank you for your upvote and comment! :)

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I love flighting this! Well done design!

    5.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,839 MartGB

    Lol feels like if I move one muscle plane will go boom...why don't you use structural panel or wings???...or if that doesn't work use fuselage to make wings makes it look allot nicer two. Awesome plane tho nice work:)

    5.9 years ago