8,281 12ocketguy Comments

  • I’m finally making planes again 6.8 years ago

    Wings look too thin. Love the vertical stabilizers. That looks fantastic. The engine's are fine. The nose needs work. You are going to need add more parts to make the nose smoother. Those are my thoughts.

  • Problem with this site.. 6.8 years ago

    @MrDoolittle I agree everybody has different opinions. That's human, however solutions come about when there are civil discussions. Solutions both sides agree to. That's what I want. I'm tired of seeing people argue. All this arguing causes more drama and drama is not needed here.

  • Regular words in a box! 6.8 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii Kewl. Thanks my dude.

  • Regular words in a box! 6.8 years ago

    How do you get the text in the box?

  • Buy Passports, ID Cards, Driving Licenses((documentationspecialists@outlook.com)) 6.8 years ago

    Can I get a waffle. Can I please get a waffle?

  • Moderator needed! Fixed 6.8 years ago

    Just report the profile and be done with it. You don't need to make a post about it. The person who made the profile did that to probably draw attention to his name and to be a troll. You are giving what the troll wants and that is attention.

  • Pick the Paint! Vote on color for Fictional GeeBee Sport plane. 6.8 years ago

    I like the red and white.

  • Spitfire_MkIa 6.8 years ago

    The scale and shape is amazing. Great work.

  • 1.8 ideas 6.8 years ago

    A corner style that "basically cuts off the corner". So a circle. SP has that.

  • PT-109 (ELCO Motor Torpedo Boat PT 103 Series) 6.8 years ago

    The detail on this is amazing. Probably could've lightened the color of the green a bit as it's hard to see some detail.

  • Why War? 6.8 years ago

    @F104Deathtrap are you talking about the Z1 computer as well as H2S radar? I really find your point interesting. I'm glad we had this conversation.

  • Why War? 6.8 years ago

    @F104Deathtrap " The war merely accelerated technology already under development". That's what I was saying. Sure competition as in company to company drives innovation however I'm also saying is without war some technology wouldn't have been developed. Would we have penicillin if it wasn't for war? No. Would we have radar? No. Would we have rockets. No. Would we even have computers? No. War drives innovation. War sucks but innovations that are beneficial to society. Yes there are innovations that are developed during peacetime. However those inventions are then accelerated and huge amount of research is done to make that invention better because of war. For example the jet engine. War drives innovation. Even look at the space race. Even though we weren't truly at war, it felt and was close to war. That competition drove huge innovation. All those technological innovations propelled the US to the Moon. I do like the conversation we are having.

  • Why War? 6.8 years ago

    @F104Deathtrap I was more of getting on the lines of the Me 262. Jets weren't used until WW2. People may of been developing jet engines , however they were just prototypes. With the technology developed from the Me 262 and jet blueprints, the jetliner came into existence.

  • Mobile friendly 2008 dodge ram 4 door 6.8 years ago

    @InternationalAircraftCompany yup.

  • Did I witness a plane crash 6.8 years ago

    There wouldn't be a orange streak, there would be a black or gray streak across the sky. There by a an orange glow though.

  • Mobile friendly 2008 dodge ram 4 door 6.8 years ago

    @Shanethepain1 I'm not a car builder. Plus I don't have time for SP right now. School and my Eagle project takes 110% of my time.

  • Mobile friendly 2008 dodge ram 4 door 6.8 years ago

    @Shanethepain1 make a doge ram 4 door without a lot of parts. You don't need an engine or interior if you want that. Engines and interiors will take a lot of parts to make. Though a car without an interior will get boring after a while.

  • Mobile friendly 2008 dodge ram 4 door 6.8 years ago

    Why can't you? Practice makes perfect.

  • What car do you want to drive/own 6.8 years ago

    I have a 1998 Ford Ranger. It's awesome. However I would love a Ford Crown Victoria. That car is sick.

  • I'm new 6.8 years ago

    Hello and welcome. Check out the highest rated planes to find fantastic builds. Also you can search with the search bar to find any planes you want. Good luck with your adventures.

  • One thing this game needs! 6.8 years ago

    uservoice it.

  • Guess the part count [CLOSED] 6.8 years ago

    @JMicah4 1. Just 1.

  • B-17 Flying Fortress Fuddy Duddy 6.8 years ago

    The shape of the fuselage is fantastic. Great job.

  • USS Tiny Two 6.8 years ago

    @PotassiumCyanide weird.

  • USS Tiny Two 6.8 years ago

    You probably have to land on it just like the USS Beast to "discover" that point. The devs probably did this so that there would be some challenges for the users in the sandbox mode.

  • How to put image in to the aircraft description?!? 6.8 years ago

    ! [Text] (Image link) minus the spaces.

  • What engine layout? 6.8 years ago

    B. B is kewl.

  • Please stop the ‘underrated users’ forums 6.8 years ago

    I feel the users should just spotlight posts instead of making those posts. That's what the spotlight system is for.

  • Has anyone noticed? 6.8 years ago

    I was only given a number when I was born. 01 is the name.

  • What order do people build their planes in? 6.9 years ago

    2 and 3 are switched for me. Other than that it's the same.

  • M4A3E8 Easy 8 Sherman Tank 6.9 years ago

    ! [text] (image link) minus the spaces between the ! [] and (). Text is what people will see when they hover their mouse over the image.

  • Spitfire mk1a teaser 6.9 years ago

    I WANT MORE!

  • About Chinese planes…… 6.9 years ago

    You could add links to web pages my [text] (link). Also get rid of the space between the parentheses and the bracket. For the text put anything you want. This is what the person will see before they click on the link. The Link is the web address.

  • Falcon 9 progress. 6.9 years ago

    This is so sick. Great job. Can't wait to see the final project.

  • Boeing SB-17G Search and Rescue 6.9 years ago

    @Revan13152 no problem.

  • What Is Drag? 6.9 years ago

    @Mattangi you're telling me you can walk on water. lol.

  • Boeing SB-17G Search and Rescue 6.9 years ago

    @Revan13152 Fine with me. However you have to add more. You can't just remove one part and call it good. You could redesign the life boat if you want to or add lettering.

  • Boeing SB-17G Search and Rescue 6.9 years ago

    @Revan13152 I accidentally deleted the link. I can't get it back. Sorry.

  • Sigh... 6.9 years ago

    I don't care if another P-51 gets featured. If it looks great then it deserves to get featured.

  • I can’t wait! 6.9 years ago

    @ThePrototype every Monday.

  • Today must be my lucky day! 6.9 years ago

    @WaffleCakes I don't see the punch line.

  • I might get a 3D printer 6.9 years ago

    @Awsomur Oh. Good to know. Thanks.

  • I might get a 3D printer 6.9 years ago

    There is a print 3D button in SP however that was when SP partnered with EUCL3D however, EUCL3D went under. So I'm not sure if you can hook up other 3D printers to SP.

  • A Question About Hinges 6.9 years ago

    @Someonetotheleft the part that moves on the hinge cannot be moved in the editor. There is no mod for it as well. You could try to set the hinge to floppy which only gets you the moving part though. Hope that helps.

  • M26 Pershing (Read controls) 6.9 years ago

    Nice detail. I love the 50 cal gun. Looks amazing. Keep up the good work.

  • ok google, stop it 6.9 years ago

    It doesn't take much effort to search the forum posts and figure out what people have already said about certain topic. Also what jerks my chain is when people ask for more weapons. SP already has plenty of weapons and a good assortment of weapons. Plus weapons are not the main part of the game. SP is about mostly learning about aerodynamics and aviation physics.

  • Rhm p-47 Razorback mkII 6.9 years ago

    @RileyRC02 no problem. If you need any help just ask.

  • Rhm p-47 Razorback mkII 6.9 years ago

    My advice is make the fuselage section that connects the cockpit to the tail. Make that more linear. If you look at picture you would see it's straight. Also add some lines to the cockpit window, it wasn't a pure glass dome. Plus the P-47 isn't that flat on the top of the fuselage. It's not quite an oval shape but your's is a but flat on top Possible change the corners to curved too see if it gives you more of a rounded top. Also make the landing gear sick out a bit forward they are not straight up and down. Lastly add some places to add bombs or rockets. This plane is a tank. Over all not bad. You could use some improvements but I like where it's going. You did a great job. Keep up the good work.