One thing that can be said is that the camera work is generally monotonous.
Monotonous images can be effective if you choose to use them, but if they become the majority of your video, it becomes boring.
Monotonous camerawork in this case means that the video is shot entirely in Orbit camera mode. In other words, no matter what kind of airplane or what kind of scene, the airplane in the center of the screen makes the screen monotonous and boring.
In order to improve this situation, it is effective to interweave camera work such as taking images from the cockpit or a part of the plane instead of the whole plane, or taking images of the plane from the ground.
In addition to this, the operation of the aircraft is also noticeably poor.
In other words, there is a blurring of motion that can be seen at various points in the aircraft's movements, and the aircraft's behavior is not smooth. As a result, the video loses its realism and becomes somewhat cheap, as if it were a copy of a toy.
I'm sorry to be so harsh, but I think that if you improve the above two points, the camera work in the video and the aircraft operation, your work will be dramatically better.
@TheNightmareCompany
There are two ways to do this.
One is to set the size of the GUI smaller from the settings field.
The other is to bring up the development console and type "//maincamera>camera.setdepth 10". To restore the original settings, type "//maincamera>camera.setdepth 1".
And for the development console, please refer to this page.
@TheNightmareCompany
Thanks！
This is a very well done wing. I usually build mostly -100 and -200 classic jumbos, but I'd like to use them in the future when I paint -400s for some airlines.
I often paint classic jumbos, but the original aircraft I painted was made in 2017.The quality of the aircraft itself is very old.
So we would like to remake it this year to make it more realistic in appearance and operability.
In that case, I would like to use the nose of the 747 you made.
@KLM_747
To begin with, the engine and drive wheels are set separately for turbocharged and non-turbocharged. In this car, the rear wheels are used for turbocharging and the front wheels are used for non-turbocharging.
The turbo lag is reproduced by setting the turbo engine to operate at a certain speed and gas pedal position.
Each acceleration is reproduced by adjusting the Min and Max of the engine.
@FujiwaraAutoShop
I've made some improvements to the suspension in the first half.
You can compare them, but there were some unnecessary links, so I removed them.
I apologize if they were necessary links.
RM, that's a nice bike.
I ride an XL200R, and the off-road bikes with air-cooled engines of that era are the best.
It is much lighter than modern bikes, and the simplicity of construction makes it easy to maintain.
The thumbnails are created by processing the background of the screenshot.
However, I would be happy if your comment about the actual image means that this work is realistic.@tsampoy
My shooting environment is iOS, so I can't use any kind of mods.
Therefore, I use specially made shooting equipment and default camera parts to shoot videos. This is how I explain it in the video.
@Kennneth
That's about two weeks.
However, it was possible to make it so quickly because I made it without the internal mechanisms of doors and bonnets and other movement-related parts.@RomanTorchwick
Moon cakes are a common snack in Japan as well. You can find these popular snacks not only in Chinatown, but also at convenience stores.
But this is a very well-made piece of cake! Looks good.
Yes, it would be fine if he had changed my work.
That's exactly what I did, to the extent that you can't tell it's Haneda Airport.
But in his case, he didn't even have that.
@SnoWFLakE0s
Wouldn't it be unpleasant to see your work uploaded under a completely different name, even though you didn't alter it at all?
I built Haneda Airport, not anything else. So if your mod airport has been modified to a level where you don't know if it's Haneda Airport or not, or if it's created as a plug-in mod for Haneda Airport, there's no problem, but what if it's exactly the same as Haneda Airport, but uploaded as a different airport?
I didn't want to create an imaginary airport. But I don't like it when people claim it's another airport when it's Haneda Airport for all intents and purposes.
He was right under the rules. But I don't think there is any respect for the original work. Since I created the real Haneda Airport, I was irritated by his actions of calling himself a different airport even though it was unmodified. So it's a matter of morality.
Certainly, there's nothing wrong with his behavior under the rules.
Look, you are insisting that the comment was a joke, but even if it was a joke, do you know that there are things you are not allowed to say? (But I don't think you know that.)
I understand, of course, that you have no authority to regulate anime-like works. So you are claiming this is a joke.
However, to dare to make such a statement on the page of this animated work, even if it is a joke, is malicious and is a clear act of harassment and insult. It is too vile, vile, vulgar and childish to say the least.
You said that you should have called it a "good build", but that was an afterthought. Who will believe your excuses? If you thought it was a "good build" from the beginning, it clearly contradicts your comment "you can't just post anime builds on a massive website".
Don't admit your mistakes and blame your own sins on the misunderstanding of the other person. Even if you are joking, you are responsible for what you say.
And in your earlier comment, you seem to have apologized, but it's full of trivial excuses, and it's not an apology in the first place.
Let's grow up, let's admit our mistakes honestly and without any pretense
@Zanedavid
In the first place, just because you made a statement that you are a joke does not mean that you are no longer responsible for your statement.
It is the worst thing for a person to make a hurtful expression in a joke.
Well, now you are the point of insensitivity.
Take responsibility for your speech!
Become a person!
Then you should be a little better.
Maybe you don't understand the meaning of responsibility?
What!
You do not seem to be suitable for the Internet.
It's a pity, but how about coming back?
To all users who claim that this work is inappropriate
What's wrong with making this work?
You talk about women and sexual expression, but are you really?
As you can see from this piece, there is little skin exposed and clothing is worn. There is also no expression that exposes the pubic area.
Even if this character were in the real world, there would be no problem.
So to speak, you guys are simply disliking this anime-like work so much that you forcefully associate it with the issue of sexual expression and make a fuss about it being inappropriate.
This is not logical; it is too heartfelt.
Please don't make a non-existent sexual expression issue for your personal likes and dislikes of anime. Please don't force the issue to be made up for self-justification.
If you don't like animated works, just say so from the start.
Please indicate what specific rules are in place if an anime-like work is inappropriate.
At least it is not on this website.
Please don't make me relate this to the prohibition of sexual expression just because I don't have it.
Not only is it unrelated to this piece, but it's totally fine in light of its rules.
In other words, all of the people here who talk about sexual expression are all emotional and immature.
Unfounded denials are an expression of your frivolity.
It would be better for all of you if you stopped.
Please don't make jokes or rants that are not interesting at all.
Your likes and dislikes are yours, but don't hurt anyone.
That is the minimum etiquette.
If anyone can't protect it, that person isn't good at internet.
It's horrible if anyone jokes as an insulting rant.
That is because they unconsciously insult people.
Just because you're kidding doesn't mean that you can't take responsibility for your statement.
Take responsibility for what you say.
Be considerate of others.
Let's grow up a little.
Let's find out the meaning of morality and etiquette.
The Internet is a free place, so at the very least, expressions that hurt people should be avoided.
Otherwise, no one will be able to freely express themselves.
Is it really inappropriate?
Are you using your likes and dislikes as a standard of judgment?
Dismissing a work based on subjective likes and dislikes is too clumsy. Putting aside your personal likes and dislikes, make an effort to look at things objectively.
I'm not a funky tree expert so I don't know the details
External software created by nagisa, but its rough usage is
When you input the angle for each pose of the rotator, a function that substitutes it will be generated.
Enter this into the input of the rotator on Simple Planes.
This external software is not published on the Simple Planes official site, so please contact Nagisa if you are interested.
@exosuit
You are making a mistake.
You say that this work contains sexuality, but as far as you can see in the comments, you are the only one to say that.
The subject of this work and its discussion is the pros and cons of the work with Japanese, anime-like expression, and the response to radical, unconscious, and vulgar comments.
Unfortunately, your opinion is similar to Strawman.
I will reiterate, but the problem is not the presence or absence of sexual expression, but the acceptance of anime expression.
I'm afraid to make such radical expressions,
I would like you to stop criticizing, as you know, from the point where the subject of the problem is off.
Why do I have to put up with an insulting sabotage?
That's too unilateral, unfair.
The ones to ignore are those who have made such comments. If you don't want to see what you don't like, you can just ignore it.
That will be equal.
Mutual non-interference is appropriate as long as they do not understand each other.@Aeromen
People are free to dislike anime, and free to express it to the world.
On the contrary, I am free to make anime-like works, and I am also free to make public announcements.
This is extremely equal.
Therefore, anime-like works should be respected for their existence, just like other works.
I don't say that I should allow people to make anime-like works.
However, we must at least allow its existence.
Otherwise it is not equal.
Therefore, criticism and criticism can be greatly done.
However, if there is a disdainful expression in my comment to me, this is nothing but a hindrance to my creative activities. That's why I make counter comments.
I will keep this line.
In the meantime, I do not argue against comments that dislike this work.
Such comments are opinions. This should be respected.
But take a look at the comments I've argued against?
Why do you say something like "destroy the work" to express your weakness in the work? Moreover,
Such comments are made on the page of the work.
For the most part, this is not a manifestation of intention, but a derogatory expression for a work that mimics manifestation of intention.
The Internet is a free place, so at the very least, expressions that hurt people should be avoided.
Otherwise, no one will be able to freely express themselves.
@Aeromen
Thank you for your advice.
The reason why the engine of this aircraft is not CF6 is that JAL was painted on Marine's 747-400
When uploading the aircraft, change the engine to CF6
One thing that can be said is that the camera work is generally monotonous.
Monotonous images can be effective if you choose to use them, but if they become the majority of your video, it becomes boring.
Monotonous camerawork in this case means that the video is shot entirely in Orbit camera mode. In other words, no matter what kind of airplane or what kind of scene, the airplane in the center of the screen makes the screen monotonous and boring.
In order to improve this situation, it is effective to interweave camera work such as taking images from the cockpit or a part of the plane instead of the whole plane, or taking images of the plane from the ground.
In addition to this, the operation of the aircraft is also noticeably poor.
In other words, there is a blurring of motion that can be seen at various points in the aircraft's movements, and the aircraft's behavior is not smooth. As a result, the video loses its realism and becomes somewhat cheap, as if it were a copy of a toy.
I'm sorry to be so harsh, but I think that if you improve the above two points, the camera work in the video and the aircraft operation, your work will be dramatically better.
@TheNightmareCompany
I flew it into the sky.
@realSavageMan
There are two ways to do this.
One is to set the size of the GUI smaller from the settings field.
The other is to bring up the development console and type "//maincamera>camera.setdepth 10". To restore the original settings, type "//maincamera>camera.setdepth 1".
And for the development console, please refer to this page.
@TheNightmareCompany
Please refer to this video
@TheNightmareCompany
List of aircraft that will appear
gunsou03
Spruance-class Destroyer
831
AI Air-to-Ship Missile
WIZARD2017
I-400 Submarine Carrier
AgnesDesign
M6A Seiran(Foldable)
Marine
ANe 250
FireFlash
Ford Mustang 1969 JOHN WICK
Scharnhorst
D-LS 133 Scharnhorst
Chancey21
Fokker Dr. 1
Komadori1
175 unknownskycity
188 castlecity
PLAtrooper
RESURGENT CLASS STAR DESTROYER
Ian_Yashima
Gundam GP01 Zephyranthes (RX-78GP01)
Zap210
My Trench Run!
My Torpedo Run!
Thunderbird 2 with High Speed Elevator Cars
Thunderbird 1 with Sci-Fi Cockpit
ALRX
Sukhoi SU-30 Flanker MKR-X1 Akari Squadron
flyingsteve88
Concorde SST
NightmareCorporation
Lockheed SR-71 FedEx
TK109074J
Train Station Unit type1
Kyokutyo
JNR KIHA391
realSavageMan2
China CRH380B Train (full interior)
PlanariaLab5
Yoshika Miyafuji (ver 2.7)
Thecatbaron
WC-204 'Caravel'
suzutuki65
BMW 635CSi [E24]
Dipper
BTTF Delorean "Part 2"
TonkatsuSyoyu
RMS TITANIC
Kaqiusha321
HMS Schooner - Pickle
spefyjerbf
SPE-Orbidyn Edgecrusher
asteroidbook345
K'tinga-Class Battlecruiser
Pianoman
Desler's flag ship Ver2.0
2Papi2Chulo
Space Shuttle Endeavour
Jundroo
P-51 Mustang
Pigpen
Wasp
1918
Boeing 747-100 Pan Am Clipper Wild Fire
HERACLIVS class Flying-Battleship
747-200 CATHAY PACIFIC
Thanks！
This is a very well done wing. I usually build mostly -100 and -200 classic jumbos, but I'd like to use them in the future when I paint -400s for some airlines.
I often paint classic jumbos, but the original aircraft I painted was made in 2017.The quality of the aircraft itself is very old.
So we would like to remake it this year to make it more realistic in appearance and operability.
In that case, I would like to use the nose of the 747 you made.
@KLM_747
Nice！
To begin with, the engine and drive wheels are set separately for turbocharged and non-turbocharged. In this car, the rear wheels are used for turbocharging and the front wheels are used for non-turbocharging.
The turbo lag is reproduced by setting the turbo engine to operate at a certain speed and gas pedal position.
Each acceleration is reproduced by adjusting the Min and Max of the engine.
@FujiwaraAutoShop
thank you !
@MintLynx
I have modified your Skyline to make a Group 5 racer, may I distribute it?
I've made some improvements to the suspension in the first half.
You can compare them, but there were some unnecessary links, so I removed them.
I apologize if they were necessary links.
http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/0002wC/Aircraft
RM, that's a nice bike.
I ride an XL200R, and the off-road bikes with air-cooled engines of that era are the best.
It is much lighter than modern bikes, and the simplicity of construction makes it easy to maintain.
The thumbnails are created by processing the background of the screenshot.
However, I would be happy if your comment about the actual image means that this work is realistic.@tsampoy
Very very nice!
I Love it!
great!
My shooting environment is iOS, so I can't use any kind of mods.
Therefore, I use specially made shooting equipment and default camera parts to shoot videos.
This is how I explain it in the video.
@Kennneth
Okay
@SavageMan
HERE
That's about two weeks.
However, it was possible to make it so quickly because I made it without the internal mechanisms of doors and bonnets and other movement-related parts.@RomanTorchwick
A decorative wheel is mounted on the front of the tire. The wheels are operated by a rotator that rotates according to the speed.
@AWESOMENESS360
Moon cakes are a common snack in Japan as well. You can find these popular snacks not only in Chinatown, but also at convenience stores.
But this is a very well-made piece of cake! Looks good.
Yes, it would be fine if he had changed my work.
That's exactly what I did, to the extent that you can't tell it's Haneda Airport.
But in his case, he didn't even have that.
@SnoWFLakE0s
Wouldn't it be unpleasant to see your work uploaded under a completely different name, even though you didn't alter it at all?
I built Haneda Airport, not anything else. So if your mod airport has been modified to a level where you don't know if it's Haneda Airport or not, or if it's created as a plug-in mod for Haneda Airport, there's no problem, but what if it's exactly the same as Haneda Airport, but uploaded as a different airport?
I didn't want to create an imaginary airport. But I don't like it when people claim it's another airport when it's Haneda Airport for all intents and purposes.
He was right under the rules. But I don't think there is any respect for the original work. Since I created the real Haneda Airport, I was irritated by his actions of calling himself a different airport even though it was unmodified. So it's a matter of morality.
Certainly, there's nothing wrong with his behavior under the rules.
@Strikefighter04
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/95y8LN/747-200-Japan-Airlines
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/v3Pspa/Wright-Airport-terminal-building
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1OLYxF/Haneda-Airport-Terminal1
nice!
As for the frame, we used Nagisa's “frame-6” as well as the previous work.@exosuit
If you ask me yes, I'll improve it before next time.@FLOWRIDER0
You can use it freely as long as you don't make anything that degrades this work to the extreme.
@ReignSUPREME
Look, you are insisting that the comment was a joke, but even if it was a joke, do you know that there are things you are not allowed to say? (But I don't think you know that.)
I understand, of course, that you have no authority to regulate anime-like works. So you are claiming this is a joke.
However, to dare to make such a statement on the page of this animated work, even if it is a joke, is malicious and is a clear act of harassment and insult. It is too vile, vile, vulgar and childish to say the least.
You said that you should have called it a "good build", but that was an afterthought. Who will believe your excuses? If you thought it was a "good build" from the beginning, it clearly contradicts your comment "you can't just post anime builds on a massive website".
Don't admit your mistakes and blame your own sins on the misunderstanding of the other person. Even if you are joking, you are responsible for what you say.
And in your earlier comment, you seem to have apologized, but it's full of trivial excuses, and it's not an apology in the first place.
Let's grow up, let's admit our mistakes honestly and without any pretense
@Zanedavid
In the first place, just because you made a statement that you are a joke does not mean that you are no longer responsible for your statement.
It is the worst thing for a person to make a hurtful expression in a joke.
Well, now you are the point of insensitivity.
Take responsibility for your speech!
Become a person!
Then you should be a little better.
Maybe you don't understand the meaning of responsibility?
What!
You do not seem to be suitable for the Internet.
It's a pity, but how about coming back?
Two words you should know
morality&Etiquette
@Zanedavid
To all users who claim that this work is inappropriate
What's wrong with making this work?
You talk about women and sexual expression, but are you really?
As you can see from this piece, there is little skin exposed and clothing is worn. There is also no expression that exposes the pubic area.
Even if this character were in the real world, there would be no problem.
So to speak, you guys are simply disliking this anime-like work so much that you forcefully associate it with the issue of sexual expression and make a fuss about it being inappropriate.
This is not logical; it is too heartfelt.
Please don't make a non-existent sexual expression issue for your personal likes and dislikes of anime. Please don't force the issue to be made up for self-justification.
If you don't like animated works, just say so from the start.
Please indicate what specific rules are in place if an anime-like work is inappropriate.
At least it is not on this website.
Please don't make me relate this to the prohibition of sexual expression just because I don't have it.
Not only is it unrelated to this piece, but it's totally fine in light of its rules.
In other words, all of the people here who talk about sexual expression are all emotional and immature.
Unfounded denials are an expression of your frivolity.
It would be better for all of you if you stopped.
Please don't make jokes or rants that are not interesting at all.
Your likes and dislikes are yours, but don't hurt anyone.
That is the minimum etiquette.
If anyone can't protect it, that person isn't good at internet.
It's horrible if anyone jokes as an insulting rant.
That is because they unconsciously insult people.
Just because you're kidding doesn't mean that you can't take responsibility for your statement.
Take responsibility for what you say.
Be considerate of others.
Let's grow up a little.
Let's find out the meaning of morality and etiquette.
The Internet is a free place, so at the very least, expressions that hurt people should be avoided.
Otherwise, no one will be able to freely express themselves.
Is it really inappropriate?
Are you using your likes and dislikes as a standard of judgment?
Dismissing a work based on subjective likes and dislikes is too clumsy. Putting aside your personal likes and dislikes, make an effort to look at things objectively.
I'm not a funky tree expert so I don't know the details
External software created by nagisa, but its rough usage is
When you input the angle for each pose of the rotator, a function that substitutes it will be generated.
Enter this into the input of the rotator on Simple Planes.
This external software is not published on the Simple Planes official site, so please contact Nagisa if you are interested.
@exosuit
I'm not the one who made Yu, but I know him
How to make, At the beginning, I made it without considering the size, etc., and later set the height to reduce the size.
@exosuit
I accept
@Aeromen
You are making a mistake.
You say that this work contains sexuality, but as far as you can see in the comments, you are the only one to say that.
The subject of this work and its discussion is the pros and cons of the work with Japanese, anime-like expression, and the response to radical, unconscious, and vulgar comments.
Unfortunately, your opinion is similar to Strawman.
I will reiterate, but the problem is not the presence or absence of sexual expression, but the acceptance of anime expression.
I'm afraid to make such radical expressions,
I would like you to stop criticizing, as you know, from the point where the subject of the problem is off.
@klm747klm747
ok, I hope you understand
@Vidal99977
Why do I have to put up with an insulting sabotage?
That's too unilateral, unfair.
The ones to ignore are those who have made such comments. If you don't want to see what you don't like, you can just ignore it.
That will be equal.
Mutual non-interference is appropriate as long as they do not understand each other.@Aeromen
People are free to dislike anime, and free to express it to the world.
On the contrary, I am free to make anime-like works, and I am also free to make public announcements.
This is extremely equal.
Therefore, anime-like works should be respected for their existence, just like other works.
I don't say that I should allow people to make anime-like works.
However, we must at least allow its existence.
Otherwise it is not equal.
Therefore, criticism and criticism can be greatly done.
However, if there is a disdainful expression in my comment to me, this is nothing but a hindrance to my creative activities. That's why I make counter comments.
I will keep this line.
In the meantime, I do not argue against comments that dislike this work.
Such comments are opinions. This should be respected.
But take a look at the comments I've argued against?
Why do you say something like "destroy the work" to express your weakness in the work? Moreover,
Such comments are made on the page of the work.
For the most part, this is not a manifestation of intention, but a derogatory expression for a work that mimics manifestation of intention.
The Internet is a free place, so at the very least, expressions that hurt people should be avoided.
Otherwise, no one will be able to freely express themselves.
@Aeromen
Oh!
Pan Am!
Here
Airbus A300B4 Japan Air System
Boeing 777-200 Japan Air System
Unpainted Ver@THEAIRCRAFTCRAFTER
NRT→HNL
iOS
@CrazyCatZe
Thank you for your advice.
The reason why the engine of this aircraft is not CF6 is that JAL was painted on Marine's 747-400
When uploading the aircraft, change the engine to CF6
@ForeverPie
This is not my work, but I recommend this work.
Japanese Air Force One
@JamesBleriot
Use this！@MaxB17
ok！@Strikefighter04