Bombs blow up in the plane when launched, the plane is not centered on the gears, making it tilt when landing, and the propellers are too close to the ground. Strikes are often, landings are too delicate, and the plane cant take off from any mountainous terrain
Plane handles well, but there are some clear issues with how rushed the plane was. Flaps are inverted, like in the previous itineration making the airplane roll when those are deployed. Furthermore, a fatal flaw was discovered during take-off and landings. Propeller is way too close to the ground, making it impossible to not destroy it during these delicate operations. It needs revisioning
Airplane performs well. Maneuverable, good firepower and armament, excellent engines, and most importantly, checks most of the standards set for Alpine crafts. It has short landings, good gliding capabilities, has a decent gear, and some okay landing capabilities. Details are good, but airfoil could be improved with custom control surfaces. Nevertheless, I greatly enjoyed this aircraft. Good job!
Aircraft is an excellent fighter on its own, And handles itself really well. Sort of reminds me of a Hayabusa, but with some obnoxiously powerful armaments that take down any aerial and ground target. Flight is smooth, stall speed is very low, and definitely is an excellent aircraft. Take-off is short but very troublesome as it automatically yaws to the side, and landing is smooth but takes too much space. This can be countered with a slow approach and airbrakes up, and the strong gears are very good at absorbing impacts. Amazing creation, and good job!
While the speed is superb, and the aircraft definitely has potential as an interceptor or ground attacker, this is not fit for Alpine terrains. Takeoffs are long, landings are unfeasible in a typical Alpine ramp simply because there is no method of slowing down, and the plane stalls at 160mph. Landing gears are surprisingly good despite the lack of shock absorbers in the rear gears, but this is still difficult to operate if not impossible in any Alpine launchpad.
Airplane doesn't perform the basic needs for the Alpine group. Gears are short, so the propeller strikes the ground at any rough landing. The plane doesn't sustain flight at less than 110mph, losing altitude at such speeds. Take offs are too long, landings are not feasible in a 100m strip. This could be a good ground attacker, but it's not a good Alpine aircraft
This plane is a substantial upgrade. There is not much to say, as I can see it has some better engines and a way easier handling at low speeds and landing. Gears lack proper shocks still but are sufficiently strong, and armament is still not powerful, but moderately fair. The plane performs up to all standards and faired well in a dogfight
Aircraft has good low-speed handling, flies well, and meets most standards. The design is very unique, and the landing gear doors are new to me. I like the creativity and the bold design, but I am very disappointed in the gear's performance. It breaks easily, they are not tall enough to avoid propellers touching the ground, and it's hard to land on rough terrains without the propellers blowing up. Furthermore, armament is sufficient, speed is excellent, but I suggest some reworking on the landing apparatus.
With how the devs designed an entire game surrounding the physics of aviation and the deep knowledge they must have on the subject matter, I think it's kind of disrespectful to just bash at them for the names of some airbases. It's just as if you bash at a gunsmith because they said magazine instead of clip, which we all recognize is unnecessary.
The rest of the points are definitely valid though. The map in general is very empty and lacking details. However, why not make custom ATC and buildings then?
Aircraft has been disqualified from the Challenge. It is not built according to the specifics of the latter and simply is built for a whole different purpose.*
Not bad! Not bad! The take-off speed is alright, the aircraft flies well, and the cockpit-less design is something I really enjoy! Furthermore, landing gears are very strong, but the plane suffers in terms of low-speed gliding and short landings. In fact, it can't land on the Tiny, and neither on the Alpine Ramp, designed to increase the landing strip in a short span of terrain. My problem is that the plane just doesn't fly at low speeds. And maneuverability. Needs more lift, which would solve both problems. Not bad though
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/1381051
@NavalGunnery
@Snazzu
@AtlasMilitaryIndustries
@Griffon1
@AAAagent07
@Esjope
@Ruskiwaffle1991
@Zdonaj07
@Yes
@OPaiTaOn
@Simplememes
(Also, little correction, "aircraft connoisseur")
I bet you'd play bongos too @PapaKernels
Play the Pianoforte. That's all I need and want. But second choice would be the Bass.
Review
Bombs blow up in the plane when launched, the plane is not centered on the gears, making it tilt when landing, and the propellers are too close to the ground. Strikes are often, landings are too delicate, and the plane cant take off from any mountainous terrain
Review
Plane handles well, but there are some clear issues with how rushed the plane was. Flaps are inverted, like in the previous itineration making the airplane roll when those are deployed. Furthermore, a fatal flaw was discovered during take-off and landings. Propeller is way too close to the ground, making it impossible to not destroy it during these delicate operations. It needs revisioning
Good luck
@LieutenantSOT
@Jabuticaba23 ill try again
@Jabuticaba23 yes
@Snazzu Maybe tomorrow, or maybe today. I am currently judging all builds
Review
All criteria have been failed.
Review
Airplane performs well. Maneuverable, good firepower and armament, excellent engines, and most importantly, checks most of the standards set for Alpine crafts. It has short landings, good gliding capabilities, has a decent gear, and some okay landing capabilities. Details are good, but airfoil could be improved with custom control surfaces. Nevertheless, I greatly enjoyed this aircraft. Good job!
Review
Aircraft is an excellent fighter on its own, And handles itself really well. Sort of reminds me of a Hayabusa, but with some obnoxiously powerful armaments that take down any aerial and ground target. Flight is smooth, stall speed is very low, and definitely is an excellent aircraft. Take-off is short but very troublesome as it automatically yaws to the side, and landing is smooth but takes too much space. This can be countered with a slow approach and airbrakes up, and the strong gears are very good at absorbing impacts. Amazing creation, and good job!
Review
Can't take off. Despite the best efforts, it simply spirals out of control and the crash of the blade even more often. Sweet camouflage though
Don't mention it! All good bro!
@JS01 cheers mann
@JS01 It would be better if you asked a mod to link it to this challenge, please! How do you expect me to find it otherwise!
Review
While the speed is superb, and the aircraft definitely has potential as an interceptor or ground attacker, this is not fit for Alpine terrains. Takeoffs are long, landings are unfeasible in a typical Alpine ramp simply because there is no method of slowing down, and the plane stalls at 160mph. Landing gears are surprisingly good despite the lack of shock absorbers in the rear gears, but this is still difficult to operate if not impossible in any Alpine launchpad.
Review
Airplane doesn't perform the basic needs for the Alpine group. Gears are short, so the propeller strikes the ground at any rough landing. The plane doesn't sustain flight at less than 110mph, losing altitude at such speeds. Take offs are too long, landings are not feasible in a 100m strip. This could be a good ground attacker, but it's not a good Alpine aircraft
@Arsenia It- Why did you join a challenge for Mountain airplanes then?!?
Review
This plane is a substantial upgrade. There is not much to say, as I can see it has some better engines and a way easier handling at low speeds and landing. Gears lack proper shocks still but are sufficiently strong, and armament is still not powerful, but moderately fair. The plane performs up to all standards and faired well in a dogfight
@Simplememes good, lemme see
Review
Aircraft has good low-speed handling, flies well, and meets most standards. The design is very unique, and the landing gear doors are new to me. I like the creativity and the bold design, but I am very disappointed in the gear's performance. It breaks easily, they are not tall enough to avoid propellers touching the ground, and it's hard to land on rough terrains without the propellers blowing up. Furthermore, armament is sufficient, speed is excellent, but I suggest some reworking on the landing apparatus.
With how the devs designed an entire game surrounding the physics of aviation and the deep knowledge they must have on the subject matter, I think it's kind of disrespectful to just bash at them for the names of some airbases. It's just as if you bash at a gunsmith because they said magazine instead of clip, which we all recognize is unnecessary.
The rest of the points are definitely valid though. The map in general is very empty and lacking details. However, why not make custom ATC and buildings then?
@Arsenia well, that's the point of the challenge
Aircraft has been disqualified from the Challenge. It is not built according to the specifics of the latter and simply is built for a whole different purpose.*
@Arsenia Awesome!
@Junkers87stuka Check my MP-1B and MP-2F, they give a good insight on what an alpine craft should be capable of
@FarrowTECH It's twice the weight of your aircraft, and it's classified as a hard landing
Review
Not bad! Not bad! The take-off speed is alright, the aircraft flies well, and the cockpit-less design is something I really enjoy! Furthermore, landing gears are very strong, but the plane suffers in terms of low-speed gliding and short landings. In fact, it can't land on the Tiny, and neither on the Alpine Ramp, designed to increase the landing strip in a short span of terrain. My problem is that the plane just doesn't fly at low speeds. And maneuverability. Needs more lift, which would solve both problems. Not bad though
@TonnkatuTonnkatuThePig Oh grand master, thanks for the Updoot
@Ergi Ay, cheers man!
@JS01 👉🏻👉🏻
@JS01 roundel?
@Simplememes USS Tiny
@TrojanAircraftSystems cheers man
@Snazzu Nope! Not at all
Forget the landing gears, what's up with the control surfaces?
@Stanmich Nah bro, yoh can do this
@Jabuticaba23 thanks!
@Stanmich It's a lotta time, don't worry
@xSUPERTTx Please do I am poor
@LieutenantSOT No probs!
@AtlasMilitaryIndustries Thanks bro!
@NeinNein yes
@Jaspy109 hey! Part of the challenge
@MuizTheWeeb cock!
Cock?
Sweet!
@AtlasMilitaryIndustries
@LieutenantSOT
@PapaKernels
@Griffon1
@ThomasRoderick
Any of y'all care to join this one?