@Jaspy190
@Prang13
Thanks for the comment.
Well...the next one is totally undecided. I have received various requests...but I will decide according to my mood.
As a Japanese, I would like to build an A6M someday.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
Thanks for the comment!
The suspension was built for looks, but the function is not so good. The tires are a little skewed under load...needs improvement.
@PRINCE210
Thanks for the comment.
Thanks also for the request. I think it is possible for me to make it. But since I just recently built the P-51, I have no plans to build the F-82 at this time. Sorry.
@Jaspy190
Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@Jaspy190
Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@BogdanX
Thank you very much for your kind advice. You are certainly right, if I drop the scale of the wing parts down to 0.1, they will no longer appear to pop out. I will keep this in mind as a reference.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Thank you for your comment.
I am using this image as a reference for this work.
Do you mean the aircraft of 355 Squadron is the one in this image?
@SemedianIndustries
Yourlocalhuman's comment made me a little depressed that he didn't give me a good or bad review of my work. In that sense, I thank you for speaking for me.
@Yourlocalhuman
I don't mind that you were just stating the facts. However, I am thinking of posting the P-51D next, so instead of pointing out that the plane exists in stock, I would be happy if you would download it, fly it in your skies, rate it if you think it is good, and point out any improvements you think are needed.
That's all.
@L0RR3B0RR3
Thank you for your comment.
As you pointed out, this aircraft is prone to stall due to rapid pitch-up during low-speed flight. ...I tried various balance adjustments, etc., but it seems they were insufficient. I will try to improve it in my next work.
@Dragoranos
Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
@MrGreen
Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@xNotDumb
I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@JustLookingForFriends
Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
The diagonal placement of the machine gun is well done. The coloring is also beautiful. It is an interesting idea to link the machine gun with the gyroscope. Good work!
@Lamialover
Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I build a variety of planes, but I also build planes that are a little less well known.
I will consider the J2M5 as a candidate the next time I make a Japanese military aircraft.
By the way, as a Japanese, I must say that the J2M5 "Raiden" may not be well known worldwide, but it is a very popular aircraft among Japanese aviation fans.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your compliments and appreciation. You compliment me a little too much and I am embarrassed.
There are many players of this game who create amazing works. I hope you will enjoy the works of various players and vote in favor of them. I will do the same.
@JustLookingForFriends
@Bryan5
OK, I'll make both.
I guess it will take some time. I don't know if I can make a good piece... both have great builders making awesome pieces.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment. I am so glad you like my work.
As you pointed out, my work is not that focused on the interior. My playing environment is mobile, so it is very difficult to do detailed modeling. Also, hydraulic related equipment and such would not make much sense to recreate in this game. Plus I am a bit lazy.
I will try my best to make good works in the future, and I will consider WW2 jets as a candidate for my work.
@JustLookingForFriends
Tei-type....It's a model with a diagonally placed machine gun. It's fine. Don't forget to remove the machine gun under the fuselage.
@HR
+1Thank you! I'm glad you like it.
Modern cars are cool, but I think old cars have beautiful curves :)
@Jaspy190
@Prang13
Thanks for the comment.
Well...the next one is totally undecided. I have received various requests...but I will decide according to my mood.
As a Japanese, I would like to build an A6M someday.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
Thanks for the comment!
The suspension was built for looks, but the function is not so good. The tires are a little skewed under load...needs improvement.
@asteroidbook345
+2Oh my, you're Japanese-American? I'm glad you have close roots :)
@ANIMESHNIKONE
@ThePIanePerson
Thank you very much! :)
@PRINCE210
Thanks for the comment.
Thanks also for the request. I think it is possible for me to make it. But since I just recently built the P-51, I have no plans to build the F-82 at this time. Sorry.
@RicardoAs1515
Thanks a lot.
But I like the Ki-100 you made.
@Jaspy190
Thanks for your comment :)
@asteroidbook345
+1Indeed.
Even I, a Japanese, think so.
It is very frustrating, but your Ki-100 is far more beautiful and complete than my work. It's a great piece of work! :)
+2@Jaspy190
+1Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@MikuisNOTaboi
+2Thanks for the comment.
Ah, Betty. That sounds interesting too.
@Jaspy190
+1Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@Jaspy190
+1Thanks a lot!
I would like to make the Ki-100 as well.
@WhoflerMan
+2Thank you! It was worth all the hard work I put into it.
@ShinyGemsBro
+2Thanks for the comment :)
@botto28
+1Thankyou!
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@Sergio666
+2Thanks a lot!
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you! Thanks also for the request. I will consider it.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you! The windows are the part I was particular about :)
@WolfHunter9111
+2Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you say so :)
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Aah! Yes, okay, you mean this one? Okay, I don't know if I can do it well, but I will try to make it.
@BogdanX
+2Thank you very much for your kind advice. You are certainly right, if I drop the scale of the wing parts down to 0.1, they will no longer appear to pop out. I will keep this in mind as a reference.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+3Thank you for your comment.
I am using this image as a reference for this work.
Do you mean the aircraft of 355 Squadron is the one in this image?
@MikuisNOTaboi
+2Thanks for your comment!
@shipfinder568
+2Thanks for following my account. I also understood for the first time how it works, that users without points cannot upvote. Thank you.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for your comments. I am also pleased that you have tested and evaluated my planes.
@SemedianIndustries
+2Yourlocalhuman's comment made me a little depressed that he didn't give me a good or bad review of my work. In that sense, I thank you for speaking for me.
@Yourlocalhuman
I don't mind that you were just stating the facts. However, I am thinking of posting the P-51D next, so instead of pointing out that the plane exists in stock, I would be happy if you would download it, fly it in your skies, rate it if you think it is good, and point out any improvements you think are needed.
That's all.
@L0RR3B0RR3
+2Thank you for your comment.
As you pointed out, this aircraft is prone to stall due to rapid pitch-up during low-speed flight. ...I tried various balance adjustments, etc., but it seems they were insufficient. I will try to improve it in my next work.
@shipfinder568
+1Thank you for your comment. Thank you for fighting with the plane I built :)
@MrGreen
+3Aah! So that's what the name means! I think it is a wonderful name to honor the brave Jevadaiah. He even went to the ISS recently :)
@Dragoranos
+2Thank you for your comment. Thank you also for your appropriate remarks on my text. You are correct in pointing out that this is a typo on my part. My apologies.
I have corrected the notation from "air superiority fighter" to "escort fighter" as you indicated.
As someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I give you the upvote.
+2@MrGreen
+4Thank you for your warm comments. I am honestly glad to hear such words. Thanks also for the upvote and spotlight.
By the way, your Mk.1 crew capsule is lovely, and as someone who plays KSP and loves Kerbals, I am delighted.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for getting back to me.
Uh...I may have misunderstood the intent of your statement. My apologies.
@xNotDumb
+2I can only say that this is the result of looking at photos of actual airplane interiors and roughly reproducing them with the technology I have. I have no intention of imitating or plagiarizing.
@Yourlocalhuman
+2Sorry, I did not understand the intent of your comment. Of course I know that the P-51 B is available as a stock plane. Is there some rule that says you can't upload the same model as a stock plane...?
@Kangy
+2Thank you for your comment!
@vcharng
Excuse my abrupt comment.
May I use the Funky Tree formula used in your "1.9.203 funky trees demonstrator" below for the plane I am building?
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you for your comment.
No problem, you may use the machine gun mount section.
The diagonal placement of the machine gun is well done. The coloring is also beautiful. It is an interesting idea to link the machine gun with the gyroscope. Good work!
@Lamialover
+1Thank you! :)
@Lamialover
+1Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I build a variety of planes, but I also build planes that are a little less well known.
I will consider the J2M5 as a candidate the next time I make a Japanese military aircraft.
By the way, as a Japanese, I must say that the J2M5 "Raiden" may not be well known worldwide, but it is a very popular aircraft among Japanese aviation fans.
@Killer123562
+2Thank you for your compliments and appreciation. You compliment me a little too much and I am embarrassed.
There are many players of this game who create amazing works. I hope you will enjoy the works of various players and vote in favor of them. I will do the same.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1@Bryan5
OK, I'll make both.
I guess it will take some time. I don't know if I can make a good piece... both have great builders making awesome pieces.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment. I am so glad you like my work.
As you pointed out, my work is not that focused on the interior. My playing environment is mobile, so it is very difficult to do detailed modeling. Also, hydraulic related equipment and such would not make much sense to recreate in this game. Plus I am a bit lazy.
I will try my best to make good works in the future, and I will consider WW2 jets as a candidate for my work.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Tei-type....It's a model with a diagonally placed machine gun. It's fine. Don't forget to remove the machine gun under the fuselage.