@Kangy
Thank you so much for your thorough description, I really appreciate it!
I understand it very well. I see, so that's why most WW2 fighters have black nose tops.
I have never tried discord before. When I have a little more time on my hands, I might give it a try. I would be very happy to have your advice then :)
@Jaspy190
Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@Jaspy190
Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@BeeBeeBanoBo
Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@JustLookingForFriends
Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
@Lamialover
Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I build a variety of planes, but I also build planes that are a little less well known.
I will consider the J2M5 as a candidate the next time I make a Japanese military aircraft.
By the way, as a Japanese, I must say that the J2M5 "Raiden" may not be well known worldwide, but it is a very popular aircraft among Japanese aviation fans.
@JustLookingForFriends
@Bryan5
OK, I'll make both.
I guess it will take some time. I don't know if I can make a good piece... both have great builders making awesome pieces.
@Killer123562
Thank you for your comment. I am so glad you like my work.
As you pointed out, my work is not that focused on the interior. My playing environment is mobile, so it is very difficult to do detailed modeling. Also, hydraulic related equipment and such would not make much sense to recreate in this game. Plus I am a bit lazy.
I will try my best to make good works in the future, and I will consider WW2 jets as a candidate for my work.
@JustLookingForFriends
Tei-type....It's a model with a diagonally placed machine gun. It's fine. Don't forget to remove the machine gun under the fuselage.
@Bryan5
@JustLookingForFriends
Thanks for the suggestion. Of these, I personally would like to make the P-51. Well, I may make a different one depending on my mood...is it the D model that you want me to make?
@JustLookingForFriends
In fact, the J1N2 "Irving" is an aircraft that I was not sure which one to build with this "Toryu". I would like to build a U.S. military aircraft next, so I will not build it right now, but I would like to build it someday.
@Bryan5
Thanks a lot!
Me-262...well, I like this airplane very much, but it seems to be difficult how to make that unique triangular fuselage cross section shape....
I'll try it out and upload it when I can make something I'm satisfied with.
Oh, of course, I know what the Me-262 Schwalbe is, lol.
@Siapaaku8897
Thank you for pointing out the bug.
After verifying various situations, I have found that when "Settings" -> "Game Quality" -> "Physics" is set to "Low", high G maneuvers cause the wing parts of the elevator to unjoin and cause abnormal vibrations. (It looks like this picture)
I reviewed the joints of the parts and updated the xml file. Still, it was not completely resolved.
Sorry, but please set "physics" to "medium" or higher when flying.
@Ihavejellybeans
Thanks for your comment.
Are you referring to the F2G? The original F4U has a distinctive inverted gull wing and I would like to make one someday :)
@Bryan5
Thank you for your comment.
I am not confident that I can make a good Bf109, as various builders have done excellent work on it. However, I have a work that I plan to submit in the future, and I will consider Bf109 as a work to be made after that.
@DESMONTHEWOLFIE
@Dragorans
@Bryan5
Thank you for your comments.
I am glad you like it. I think there are still some improvements to be made to the wing folding, which I will work on in the future.
You are a builder I admire, and once again you have shown us a wonderful build with remarkable realism and originality. Great work!!
+1@Kangy
+1Thank you so much for your thorough description, I really appreciate it!
I understand it very well. I see, so that's why most WW2 fighters have black nose tops.
I have never tried discord before. When I have a little more time on my hands, I might give it a try. I would be very happy to have your advice then :)
@GabrielSatori @Dragoranos
Thankyou!!
@GabrielSatori
+1Oops, I forgot to fix it. Thanks for pointing that out.
I updated the XML file and fixed the bug.
@ChamDel78
+1Thanks for making the new version. It's quite avant-garde :)
@OTOjustGoose
+1Thank you so much!
@HR
+1Thank you! I'm glad you like it.
Modern cars are cool, but I think old cars have beautiful curves :)
@asteroidbook345
+1Indeed.
Even I, a Japanese, think so.
@Jaspy190
+1Thank you for writing these interesting facts.
I like the sleek look of the Ki-48, but I don't think I'll make one right now, as I've just finished making the Ki-45, which is partially appropriated from the Ki-48 design.
I will keep it in mind as a candidate to make one.
@Jaspy190
+1Yes, you are correct about the models later than Type 1-Tei (including Ki-100).
Models prior to Type1-Hei had a 12.7mm machine gun in the nose.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment.
I have received some requests for jets from the late Great War, such as the Me-262, and I would like to consider the P-59 as a candidate.
@Jaspy190
+1Thanks a lot!
I would like to make the Ki-100 as well.
@botto28
+1Thankyou!
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Hmmm...ki 61 is good too. It looks smart and I like it. However, I'm totally undecided on what to make next, so I hope you'll be patient with me.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you! Thanks also for the request. I will consider it.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you! The windows are the part I was particular about :)
@BeeBeeBanoBo
+1Aah! Yes, okay, you mean this one? Okay, I don't know if I can do it well, but I will try to make it.
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for your comments. I am also pleased that you have tested and evaluated my planes.
@shipfinder568
+1Thank you for your comment. Thank you for fighting with the plane I built :)
@Yourlocalhuman
+1Thanks for getting back to me.
Uh...I may have misunderstood the intent of your statement. My apologies.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thank you for your comment.
Well...let me make a small correction.
It is true that the "Sturmböcke" Fw-190 was equipped with rockets. But its subtype seems to be A-6 or A-8. I created the A-5, and the fact that the A-5 carried rocket bombs, I could not confirm. (Sorry if my perception is wrong).
I am glad that you called my work a "real plane", but my perception is that this is "a bit false".
But this is a game, and even if it's a little different, if it makes it more interesting, I think it's okay.
@AnHNWhiteCornet
+1Thank you for your comment.
No problem, you may use the machine gun mount section.
@Lamialover
+1Thank you! :)
@Lamialover
+1Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I build a variety of planes, but I also build planes that are a little less well known.
I will consider the J2M5 as a candidate the next time I make a Japanese military aircraft.
By the way, as a Japanese, I must say that the J2M5 "Raiden" may not be well known worldwide, but it is a very popular aircraft among Japanese aviation fans.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1@Bryan5
OK, I'll make both.
I guess it will take some time. I don't know if I can make a good piece... both have great builders making awesome pieces.
@Killer123562
+1Thank you for your comment. I am so glad you like my work.
As you pointed out, my work is not that focused on the interior. My playing environment is mobile, so it is very difficult to do detailed modeling. Also, hydraulic related equipment and such would not make much sense to recreate in this game. Plus I am a bit lazy.
I will try my best to make good works in the future, and I will consider WW2 jets as a candidate for my work.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Tei-type....It's a model with a diagonally placed machine gun. It's fine. Don't forget to remove the machine gun under the fuselage.
@Bryan5
+1@JustLookingForFriends
Thanks for the suggestion. Of these, I personally would like to make the P-51. Well, I may make a different one depending on my mood...is it the D model that you want me to make?
@dINE
+1Thank you!
@JustLookingForFriends
+1In fact, the J1N2 "Irving" is an aircraft that I was not sure which one to build with this "Toryu". I would like to build a U.S. military aircraft next, so I will not build it right now, but I would like to build it someday.
@JustLookingForFriends
+1Thanks for your comment.Doitashimashite.
@Rompuss62
+1Thank you!
@Bryan5
+1Thanks a lot!
Me-262...well, I like this airplane very much, but it seems to be difficult how to make that unique triangular fuselage cross section shape....
I'll try it out and upload it when I can make something I'm satisfied with.
Oh, of course, I know what the Me-262 Schwalbe is, lol.
@MulletMan001
+1Thank you!!
@Siapaaku8897
+1Thank you for pointing out the bug.
After verifying various situations, I have found that when "Settings" -> "Game Quality" -> "Physics" is set to "Low", high G maneuvers cause the wing parts of the elevator to unjoin and cause abnormal vibrations. (It looks like this picture)
I reviewed the joints of the parts and updated the xml file. Still, it was not completely resolved.
Sorry, but please set "physics" to "medium" or higher when flying.
@Siapaaku8897
+1What kind of bug? I thought there was no problem as far as I tried it...?
@Metaa
+1Oh my...sorry about our timing together. Looking forward to your Tiger Ⅰ.
@Ihavejellybeans
+1Thanks!
@Bryan5
+1Thank you so much!! This was a difficult and good practice assignment. I hope you like it.
@MrShenanigansSP
+1Thanks!!
@Ihavejellybeans
+1Thanks for your comment.
Are you referring to the F2G? The original F4U has a distinctive inverted gull wing and I would like to make one someday :)
@Dragorans
+1Thanks.
Hmmm, I don't think platinum in 20 days is indeed impossible... lol I will try my best to become it someday.
@Bryan5
+1Thank you for your comment.
I am not confident that I can make a good Bf109, as various builders have done excellent work on it. However, I have a work that I plan to submit in the future, and I will consider Bf109 as a work to be made after that.
@Scottydoestuff
+1@DashEight
Thank you for your comments.I am glad you like it.
@DESMONTHEWOLFIE
+1@Dragorans
@Bryan5
Thank you for your comments.
I am glad you like it. I think there are still some improvements to be made to the wing folding, which I will work on in the future.
@SamuelC
Indeed you are right.
@SilverStar
Thank you. Coordinating performance is a very difficult problem when building any airplane.
@ShinyGemsBro
Well...you are certainly right. I could have reduced 12p this time....
I'll do that next time I build a bomber. Thank you very much!
@Trainzo
Thank you for your compliments! :)
@ShinyGemsBro
Beautiful winter camouflage. It is further implemanted in various places. Nice :)
@Zaineman
Nice.This F22 is a cool build. Thanks for sharing it with me :)