Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here.
Note that no politics should be discussed on this site. Thanks.
“Understanding that some designers studied at Hogwarts, the jury can disqualify your car (and in general, how do you accelerate to 200 km/h in 2 seconds, and you are not carried off the track at all when you turn 120 degrees at full speed!?) because using magic.”
Putting anti-furry and obsessing over burning things with a flamethrower in the same sentence generally don't make the happiest of crowds when they read that. Removed for obvious reasons.
@CCCPAirways Yes, I understand it is a meme. As much as I understand the meme myself, I think it is still unacceptable to you know... build a guillotine dedicated for a specific individual. It cannot be left up, even if it is a joke.
After further review, we can't exactly have the username / handle of a person written on a guillotine... That is simply not acceptable and is taking the joke too far. The post will be removed. But I do admit, this is a well-made guillotine replica...
Ok sir. As much as the collective may dislike comrade Vyacheslav "wart hunder" Bulannikov... putting that image up there is not appropriate. and I've removed it from the description.
Feel free to re-upload with a screenshot of the actual build. Unfortunately we do not allow the use of an image that does not contain the build for the thumbnail.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here.
.
Memes are one thing… it’s different when there are obvious loss of life in an accident. It may perhaps be understandable making a meme commending the actions of crew or individuals in aviation accidents such as UA232 or US1549, etc. However, a low-effort meme shown here does not bring aviation history to light nor benefit anyone. It is too far off-topic and frankly disrespectful.
You are in no place to judge the maturity of others if you are unable to demonstrate maturity and rational thinking yourself. Leave the guy alone. If you have a problem with him, use the block feature. The way I see it, this is simply picking on a guy to stir up drama, and is simply unacceptable. @TheCommentaryGuy
That’s a tough one… orthographic drawings for the CRJ are just not common nor of high quality on the open internet. You’d just have to use lots and lots of reference images to make out the shape, unfortunately. There’s usually more info on the 7/9/1000.
Very nice mobile friendly regional pencil of the canada variety.
.
Just some feedback. (Of course with mobile friendly low parts approach in mind)
The Good:
Wing shape is representative.
The -100/-200 doesn't have slats, it didn't fool you!
The stubby tail is stubby, the shape is pretty representative.
Slight Inaccuracies:
The windshield is a bit too big. The drawing you used appeared to be scanned using a radish so I cant blame you. On the actual (-100 through -1000), a window sill exists between the skin and the glass, which is mistakenly depicted as glass in the reference.
The wing-fuselage fairing is misshaped. The top of the fairing sits flush-ish with the fuselage. You may achieve that using Hard for the top 2 corners. In addition, the front of the fairing "blends" into the wing smoothly (for all AC -100 through -1000), while the rear "half" protrudes from the wing and the slight bump-out houses the gear (zoom in). The "halves" are only visible from underneath, and appear to be smooth and as one from other angles (especially the -1/200 due to lack of slats, approaches slightly nose-down vs. 7/9/1000).
The engine nacelles are shorter and more rounded. Again the drawing referenced isn't clear, not your fault.
The inboard spoiler is for lift dump, and pops automatically (if primed) when sufficient pressure is felt on the gear. The outboard spoilers are multi-functional.
Suggestions:
For little additions to partcount (<30 ish) you could think about including these details.
Aforementioned window sill, colour it metallic.
Outline doors and covers, or simply show where they are with the metallic scuff plate.
Little APU heat shield plate and hole on the side of the tail (2 parts).
Metallic leading edge.
Flat hinge fairings.
Canadair/Bombardier/(Mitsubishi if you're a rebel) logo under the aftmost cockpit glass panel.
@ZEROandSAYOU Your comment is unacceptable in reference to the guidelines. Please provide constructive criticism and not a pointless insult.
@FlyingBathtub Please do not pour fuel on fire. Making another pointless comment in an already unnecessary argument is not needed. Just ignore it and move on.
@Sabertoothyt526 Please read the rules regarding proper comment and community guidelines. If you do not appreciate what is said about your build, you may block the user, remove the comment, or report it. There is absolutely no need to continue an argument; they get nothing out of an insult, and nor do you. Please proceed situations like this with maturity.
.
All three of you will receive a strike this chain of comments are absolutely unnecessary. If you have a problem with someone or something, simply move on - they didn't punch you or anything.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here.
Note that no politics should be discussed on this site. Thanks.
Very nice.
Beautiful.
@KOROaviation Link please.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting.
Please try to make major changes before posting it.
Why would you think this is acceptable to post?
Read the rules please...
Thumbnail is probably not the best choice of clipart use... Let's not try to cause drama here.
Well yes, that would be the Ford Anglia 105E. kek
Please do not use image that does not show the build as the default thumbnail. Please use a screenshot of the build as the thumbnail. Thanks.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Very cool.
If I see politics down here, you will expect the comments to be yeet'd. The tag is "Fictional" for a reason. No need to be butthurt.
Nothing I can see that indicates it was removed by a mod, could have been reported for some reason. It’s back up now. @PZLAerospace
@Walvis They make instruments, probably, I think.
This is a feature. Yes, you can remove other's comments on your own post. Post removed now the question is answered.
This is extremely off-topic and can spam the forums going forward.
Putting anti-furry and obsessing over burning things with a flamethrower in the same sentence generally don't make the happiest of crowds when they read that. Removed for obvious reasons.
@CCCPAirways Yes, I understand it is a meme. As much as I understand the meme myself, I think it is still unacceptable to you know... build a guillotine dedicated for a specific individual. It cannot be left up, even if it is a joke.
After further review, we can't exactly have the username / handle of a person written on a guillotine... That is simply not acceptable and is taking the joke too far. The post will be removed. But I do admit, this is a well-made guillotine replica...
Ok sir. As much as the collective may dislike comrade Vyacheslav "wart hunder" Bulannikov... putting that image up there is not appropriate. and I've removed it from the description.
Feel free to re-upload with a screenshot of the actual build. Unfortunately we do not allow the use of an image that does not contain the build for the thumbnail.
Feel free to re-upload with a screenshot of the actual build. Unfortunately we do not allow the use of an image for the thumbnail.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@Planebuilder2123 dont forget about the tim hortons cups for extra rigidity
@WorstPlaneIEverMake Yes
Done. @AnomalyYeet
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here.
.
Memes are one thing… it’s different when there are obvious loss of life in an accident. It may perhaps be understandable making a meme commending the actions of crew or individuals in aviation accidents such as UA232 or US1549, etc. However, a low-effort meme shown here does not bring aviation history to light nor benefit anyone. It is too far off-topic and frankly disrespectful.
@Zamboi No and No. You should know better. It is not acceptable to send death threats. No matter to who.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@RaptorRules -700
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
@FirstFish83828 Excellent.
Chad Canadian aircraft enjoyer.
Well done.
skil ishyu
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Feel free to re-upload with a thumbnail showing the actual build, not a photograph.
No politics please. I don’t want to hear it.
This is not “harassment” - this is a tonk, stop reporting it as such.
Not sure. Will ask about it. @Hiimakeplanes
You are in no place to judge the maturity of others if you are unable to demonstrate maturity and rational thinking yourself. Leave the guy alone. If you have a problem with him, use the block feature. The way I see it, this is simply picking on a guy to stir up drama, and is simply unacceptable. @TheCommentaryGuy
You forgor about ｃａｍｂｅｒ @FairFireFlight
Good. @jamesPLANESii
That’s a tough one… orthographic drawings for the CRJ are just not common nor of high quality on the open internet. You’d just have to use lots and lots of reference images to make out the shape, unfortunately. There’s usually more info on the 7/9/1000.
@DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL
Very nice mobile friendly regional pencil of the canada variety.
.
Just some feedback. (Of course with mobile friendly low parts approach in mind)
The Good:
Slight Inaccuracies:
Suggestions:
Dear lord.
@ReignSUPREME I don't see a problem. Go ahead.
Also, absolutely beautiful livery.
Off topic exists... but this is so far off the deep end. It is simply irrelevant to the community.
@Fish83828 No. 6.
@Fish83828 When I roll 7 on my daily morning single dice roll.
@DatRoadTrainGuy19 Yes.
@ZEROandSAYOU Your comment is unacceptable in reference to the guidelines. Please provide constructive criticism and not a pointless insult.
@FlyingBathtub Please do not pour fuel on fire. Making another pointless comment in an already unnecessary argument is not needed. Just ignore it and move on.
@Sabertoothyt526 Please read the rules regarding proper comment and community guidelines. If you do not appreciate what is said about your build, you may block the user, remove the comment, or report it. There is absolutely no need to continue an argument; they get nothing out of an insult, and nor do you. Please proceed situations like this with maturity.
.
All three of you will receive a strike this chain of comments are absolutely unnecessary. If you have a problem with someone or something, simply move on - they didn't punch you or anything.