Moderators usually post pre-made comments written by the developers of the site when they removed your build. They usually tell you that your post was removed due to violating one of the rules and do not elaborate further. In cases of “insufficient” modifications, the moderator will tell you that the changes are not sufficient enough to stay on the site. Did you receive any comments from a moderator at all at the time of the removal? If you did receive such comments, does it tell you that your changes are insufficient or not.
On one hand, people might struggle making a functional craft and therefore use stock crafts. On the other hand, some people do not want to share their creations to the wider public or share their creations but on the wrong website instead of simpleplanes.com. This should explain the statistics.
@WINGSIRONOFICIAL, why tag a large amount of people without their express consent, it is annoying for them. On the other hand, you can ONLY tag 3 users, therefore the next 14 users you have tagged will not be notified of such.
.
Update: the comment with the absurd amount of user tags has been removed.
Soviet Engineers: “Hey guys, can we copy your homework?”
.
Wright Aeronautical: “Sure, just make some differences, so it doesn’t look as obvious as a ripoff.”
.
Soviet Engineers: “Thank you.”
I agree with FirstFish83828 here. I highly urge you to
1. Remove this build, and
2. Post it as unlisted; if a build is unlisted, it will not be visible on the plane feed.
For the grille, use single line fuselages for the horizontal bars and hollow fuselages for the vertical bars. This might help reduce part count.
.
By the way, what made the part count so high?
Please clarify the situation. I can not quite understand what are you saying. To note, shadowbanning occurs when website functionality may be seemingly unaffected for you, but you are not visible.
Houseman: "Oooo, is it a box of fumos?"
Mailman: "Yes."
Houseman: Takes inside "Now my expensive fumo has come. time to unbox it."
Fumo Box: Transforms into something worse
Houseman: "Oh, no! Its a TRANSFORMER!!! RUN!!!"
@OUGHTO, reformers were a group of military officials who thought that the US armed forces were addicted to high-end, expensive technology and campaigned for inexpensive low-tech vehicles to be put in service, kind of like wanting the US armed forces to adopt the Soviet doctrine of quantity over quality (something the US armed forces is unwilling, due to also how expensive their trained soldiers are). This particular plane, a very technologically advanced but also ludicrously expensive fighter aircraft might make the reformers "cry in tears", hence the title.
.
Also, please do not use profanity on this site. :)
@hela, to start a new one, click on the plane in an octagram and then you can build planes from there.
@hela, it is recommended you use an adequate machine translator to communicate with people who primarily speak in another language. By that, you don’t have to wait for people to use a machine translator to respond. :)
.
@hela，建议您使用合适的机器翻译器与主要使用另一种语言的人进行交流。这样，您就不必等待人们使用机器翻译来响应。 :)
Your ezgif.com image appears to be either containing a wrong url or is expired. Please repair this error; it is recommended you choose a different host. Anyways, does postimg work on gifs? Thank you.
Unfortunately, while they can accept your apology, they might not remove the strike (speculation). You should have made a passcode to your phone to prevent unauthorized access by third parties like your brother.
I see stock image website watermarks plastered throughout this image.
Moderators usually post pre-made comments written by the developers of the site when they removed your build. They usually tell you that your post was removed due to violating one of the rules and do not elaborate further. In cases of “insufficient” modifications, the moderator will tell you that the changes are not sufficient enough to stay on the site. Did you receive any comments from a moderator at all at the time of the removal? If you did receive such comments, does it tell you that your changes are insufficient or not.
+1The meme is relatable to me.
This is a highly detailed build, fitting for a spotlight. The plane’s shape looks like a fantasy creation.
+1On one hand, people might struggle making a functional craft and therefore use stock crafts. On the other hand, some people do not want to share their creations to the wider public or share their creations but on the wrong website instead of simpleplanes.com. This should explain the statistics.
+2@WINGSIRONOFICIAL, why tag a large amount of people without their express consent, it is annoying for them. On the other hand, you can ONLY tag 3 users, therefore the next 14 users you have tagged will not be notified of such.
.
Update: the comment with the absurd amount of user tags has been removed.
The thumbnail made me concerned it may be removed for having a “misleading thumbnail”.
Well, that’s pretty nice, when you want to put even more interesting and fantastical photos that makes other users jealous. >:)
+1Finally, know how of how to make a functioning T-35.
+2That’s a decent A-10 replica. However, I think you might need hollow fuselages covering the the main engines to make it look even better.
Soviet Engineers: “Hey guys, can we copy your homework?”
+3.
Wright Aeronautical: “Sure, just make some differences, so it doesn’t look as obvious as a ripoff.”
.
Soviet Engineers: “Thank you.”
@Warboy, you took 11 months to respond. Should have been minutes or a day.
That’s nice. I bet the big hat on top of the plane is gonna ruin the aerodynamics of the plane.
An early form of Tail’s transforming plane.
+4Welcome.
+1.
Please take some time to read the rules that you must follow when engaging in this website.
.
Thanks
@PapaKernels, no, thank you.
+1I agree with FirstFish83828 here. I highly urge you to
+11. Remove this build, and
2. Post it as unlisted; if a build is unlisted, it will not be visible on the plane feed.
For the grille, use single line fuselages for the horizontal bars and hollow fuselages for the vertical bars. This might help reduce part count.
.
By the way, what made the part count so high?
Please clarify the situation. I can not quite understand what are you saying. To note, shadowbanning occurs when website functionality may be seemingly unaffected for you, but you are not visible.
+2This is a good replica. Sadly, the stabilizers are not fuselage wings.
F
As in AlbertanPlaneMaker, ('-')7
+6Did you really make it? It has a decent interior but horrible looks.
The droplet’s big brother.
+2Glorious nippon sword. Can be used by large mecha builds!
That must have been an interesting concept but sadly, this is not really representative of that concept.
+2@shoot4942, I am more comfortable creating fictional creations than replicas.
How detailed is this? Nice! I think you are using a very high end computer to create this.
.
Can you create a simple T-18 tank?
Houseman: "Oooo, is it a box of fumos?"
+2Mailman: "Yes."
Houseman: Takes inside "Now my expensive fumo has come. time to unbox it."
Fumo Box: Transforms into something worse
Houseman: "Oh, no! Its a TRANSFORMER!!! RUN!!!"
@OUGHTO, reformers were a group of military officials who thought that the US armed forces were addicted to high-end, expensive technology and campaigned for inexpensive low-tech vehicles to be put in service, kind of like wanting the US armed forces to adopt the Soviet doctrine of quantity over quality (something the US armed forces is unwilling, due to also how expensive their trained soldiers are). This particular plane, a very technologically advanced but also ludicrously expensive fighter aircraft might make the reformers "cry in tears", hence the title.
.
Also, please do not use profanity on this site. :)
@hela, to start a new one, click on the plane in an octagram and then you can build planes from there.
@hela, it is recommended you use an adequate machine translator to communicate with people who primarily speak in another language. By that, you don’t have to wait for people to use a machine translator to respond. :)
.
@hela，建议您使用合适的机器翻译器与主要使用另一种语言的人进行交流。这样，您就不必等待人们使用机器翻译来响应。 :)
Nice ground-effect craft, likely used for the civilian market due to it’s looks. I like the detailing, especially the framing around the canopy.
Why is he giving away his most precious thing that can act as a therapy for his depression? I feel very worried for him.
+1Nice. The canopy needs a bit of framing though (like the P-51).
+1This is a well crafted build. I like it.
+1*Touhou fan song gets included in a SimplePlanes video.
+1.
*Heavy Touhoufan breathing
And so, you have made a moe anthropomorphism of SimplePlanes, I see... Andy Gary, somebody make this a mascot!
From the title, I thought this character was based off ZUN. Apparently it wasn’t. XD
+1Nice. Hope it goes well.
When you turn something into some sci-if plane. The tail rotor might be unnecessary.
+1@StugnaATGM, oh sorry. I have edited my previous comment.
Ah, I didn’t see you often in MP nowadays, but nice.
+1Ah, that’s one nice, 4th generation aircraft you got there.
@EasternPatrick, the Soviet Union loves this idea.
+2Quite nice additions to the cockpit though.
Now that’s a poor farmer’s quality air tractor. ;)
+6.
Love the detailing anyways.
Your ezgif.com image appears to be either containing a wrong url or is expired. Please repair this error; it is recommended you choose a different host. Anyways, does postimg work on gifs? Thank you.
+1Unfortunately, while they can accept your apology, they might not remove the strike (speculation). You should have made a passcode to your phone to prevent unauthorized access by third parties like your brother.
+7Except that there are rules to follow when discussing here; said rules apply to everywhere on this website, including this particular forum post.
Loud wunz are betta wunz!
- Typical ork
+1And so comes the new saga of German Corsairs...
+5