@DatRoadTrainGuy19, the Airbus A400m, on which this build is a replica of, does exist in real life, so “realism critiques” would almost be rendered moot, except if you are comparing said replica build to the aircraft it is based. It appears to me that you just copied my (non-sarcastic) critique of another build post of someone else’s and pasted it on your comment, which is not certainly a good thing to do when you want to give out your opinions about an user’s aircraft.
Hello. It is recommended that you save all the login information in your notes, such as a text file on your computer (or even an usb drive which you can pick up if needed). I am glad you were finally able to to log back.
I would really like if every country had a tag, but server costs hindered it.
.
I would favor such a tag because Ukraine build some vehicles, including the now-destroyed Antonov An-225.
On one time, there were 4 people, ren among them, who hated how mere mentions of discord servers seem to violate rules on advertising, and that the moderators would not ban them. They started to complain, which descended into flaming and harassment, forcing their leader, HellFireKoder to intervene. They were each given punishment, with only one being active on the site again, which is not ren. Part of the reason comes from the vagueness of said rule, which could lead users to interpret it as “mere mentions of the server without links are prohibited”, even though the moderators confirmed they did not. Had they banned mere mentions of discord server, discord server staff would not be able to post server updates on this site (which meant less freedom for users) and a lot more that needed action could appear, increasing the site moderators’ workload, and jeopardy ensues.
.
I sort of agree with FairFireFlight, as these users who were banned received moderation intervention before (and had a lot of strikes on their record), and that they spend hours trying to figure out which action is appropriate.
.
I hope you understand and please do NOT try to argue, bash, and vent again; it’s already passed and resolved and people cannot handle drama, myself included.
Good point, although I have not seen it. Usually trends like this become unfunny fads because of oversaturation, requiring moderator intervention. Please pin this forum post, thanks.
What did you improve? Please tell, so we can know if there is effort or not. I cannot check it using SimplePlanes because I lost both SimplePlanes and steam.
A large, commercial aircraft with a fighter canopy and cockpit is extremely uncommon. They generally have side-by-side cockpits with windshields that do not usually encompass the entire cockpit area. However, I think I get what you mean.
There is no way you could reneenable this sort of thing and I have not seen a button that sets the follow list to private. It’s likely a bug related to internet speed.
Nice work on the livery and sponsor labels. I would like if the linkages on the suspension could move. Also, the top inlet needs to be a fuselage inlet instead of a fake inlet, otherwise it will just be a thing that drags the car down without any benefit.
Nice armored artillery truck with pretty much sufficiently well modeled window frames, grille, interior, car lamps, and engine. You might need some work on the cannon platform though, such as the lack of other support beams. Plus the joints on the suspension need to be a bit thicker.
for some reason im the only person that is allowed to get the Railway wagon...
What does that mean? Please clarify, thanks.
.
Yes, I can spot a troll face over there. I hope this build would not get a DMCA takedown notice from Carlos.
@AnHNWhiteCornet, okay then. Start by replacing the inlet with a hollow fuselage, then hollow out the fuselage blocks (make sure they’re hollow fuselages, use overload to replace them, however note that by replacing them all connections might be lost).
@TheFlightGuySP, @goboygo1, @Far2Crispy, it’s actually more confusing than that. The terms of service contains no provisions related to user content (there is no clause of licensing and sub-licensing such as section 4 of twitter’s terms of service, which could cause legal ramifications). However, the “Tweaking airplanes is okay” section of the rules appears flexible and appears to have allowed the taking of parts from one to another (if I am not wrong). Perhaps, such could apply to funky trees code as well.
.
Note that some users such as PlanariaLab may place copyright notices in their code.
This is great work. Some people might have trouble creating eyebrow windows on their airliner front fascia.
.
Now, using the same body, make the 737’s bigger cousin, the Boeing 707.
@Embedd, well, tell him how to read replies. There is a button named “notifications” right under your username besides the main, horizontal navigation tab (menu), if you click it.
.
Oh, I overlooked the successor auto-credit. Sorry about that.
@Ginger249, all the weapons might need to be eliminated. The weapons and accessories in where the hands should be should be replaced by 5 digit hands, like a human has, but robotic. You can make different versions with different configurations (like a military version with a gun on it’s arm), but the base (civilian) model should not have any.
.
P.S. You should post these versions as unlisted and then put links to said unlisted posts in the base model post’s description. I’ll give you how to link: [name](url)
Thanks.
@Datsungamer04, I am just making sure, that so you write simple reviews in comments instead of creating complex and quite unnecessary forum posts that review every craft you have encountered. The “Gotcha” you said seems like a sign you need clarification, although I am not sure if you need it or not.
@Rafalemmm, okay but I don’t feel notifying you (via leaving a comment) for every single use is always necessary after all. A credit is usually enough.
@flightdesigner, if something breaks the rules, you are supposed to remove it ASAP. Go find the down arrow button besides the tags, then click “remove” to remove your post.
The cat turret.
.
Makes a cute head for a “chibi” patrol boat.
@DatRoadTrainGuy19, the Airbus A400m, on which this build is a replica of, does exist in real life, so “realism critiques” would almost be rendered moot, except if you are comparing said replica build to the aircraft it is based. It appears to me that you just copied my (non-sarcastic) critique of another build post of someone else’s and pasted it on your comment, which is not certainly a good thing to do when you want to give out your opinions about an user’s aircraft.
Hello. It is recommended that you save all the login information in your notes, such as a text file on your computer (or even an usb drive which you can pick up if needed). I am glad you were finally able to to log back.
@NatsukiHoshino, no, it’s Japan.
I would really like if every country had a tag, but server costs hindered it.
.
I would favor such a tag because Ukraine build some vehicles, including the now-destroyed Antonov An-225.
Turn the light on the port side red and throw that lamp on the vertical stabilizer away.
Thumbnail 1: Oh, that’s so nice, even for an anime-modeled robot.
Thumbnail 2: Do robots dream of organic robots?
Thumbnail 3: Rumia, is that you?
On one time, there were 4 people, ren among them, who hated how mere mentions of discord servers seem to violate rules on advertising, and that the moderators would not ban them. They started to complain, which descended into flaming and harassment, forcing their leader, HellFireKoder to intervene. They were each given punishment, with only one being active on the site again, which is not ren. Part of the reason comes from the vagueness of said rule, which could lead users to interpret it as “mere mentions of the server without links are prohibited”, even though the moderators confirmed they did not. Had they banned mere mentions of discord server, discord server staff would not be able to post server updates on this site (which meant less freedom for users) and a lot more that needed action could appear, increasing the site moderators’ workload, and jeopardy ensues.
.
I sort of agree with FairFireFlight, as these users who were banned received moderation intervention before (and had a lot of strikes on their record), and that they spend hours trying to figure out which action is appropriate.
.
I hope you understand and please do NOT try to argue, bash, and vent again; it’s already passed and resolved and people cannot handle drama, myself included.
Good point, although I have not seen it. Usually trends like this become unfunny fads because of oversaturation, requiring moderator intervention. Please pin this forum post, thanks.
Well, that’s a nice car anyways.
Vincent, show him that you’re better by making this!
It isn’t unlisted as it is visible in your craft feed. That is all I have.
Breaking Bad needing a professional chef to cook all of these. :/
@ThatOneRoadTrainBuilder19, and it’s based on a real aircraft too.
What did you improve? Please tell, so we can know if there is effort or not. I cannot check it using SimplePlanes because I lost both SimplePlanes and steam.
The same truck but with a different cab.
A large, commercial aircraft with a fighter canopy and cockpit is extremely uncommon. They generally have side-by-side cockpits with windshields that do not usually encompass the entire cockpit area. However, I think I get what you mean.
That was a very good, detailed build. The sponsor labels need to be a bit more detailed and varied.
There is no way you could reneenable this sort of thing and I have not seen a button that sets the follow list to private. It’s likely a bug related to internet speed.
Hi Gary Andy. Care developing PlanesSimple?
Nice work on the livery and sponsor labels. I would like if the linkages on the suspension could move. Also, the top inlet needs to be a fuselage inlet instead of a fake inlet, otherwise it will just be a thing that drags the car down without any benefit.
Nice armored artillery truck with pretty much sufficiently well modeled window frames, grille, interior, car lamps, and engine. You might need some work on the cannon platform though, such as the lack of other support beams. Plus the joints on the suspension need to be a bit thicker.
@JuanNotAnAlt, @ThatOneRoadTrainBuilder19, so if this was published publicly, is it free to use too?
That’s pretty nice but simple replica isn’t it? I suggest you use fuselage smoothing for the turrets.
What does that mean? Please clarify, thanks.
.
Yes, I can spot a troll face over there. I hope this build would not get a DMCA takedown notice from Carlos.
@AdequatePlanes101, good. Now make a toy series out from it (something like a not really g.i.joe-rip-off maybe?).
@AnHNWhiteCornet, okay then. Start by replacing the inlet with a hollow fuselage, then hollow out the fuselage blocks (make sure they’re hollow fuselages, use overload to replace them, however note that by replacing them all connections might be lost).
What a nice paint job edit, regardless, with 2 additional parts. Now can you do a cockpit?
When you made an 80s toy come to life.
This is probably a joke tag the developers made and the developers might not be interested in fixing this “it doesn’t work” problem.
Now James is getting even more jealous now!
I am not sure what problem are you referring to? Please clearly specify the problem, so I can help you. Thanks.
@TheFlightGuySP, @goboygo1, @Far2Crispy, it’s actually more confusing than that. The terms of service contains no provisions related to user content (there is no clause of licensing and sub-licensing such as section 4 of twitter’s terms of service, which could cause legal ramifications). However, the “Tweaking airplanes is okay” section of the rules appears flexible and appears to have allowed the taking of parts from one to another (if I am not wrong). Perhaps, such could apply to funky trees code as well.
.
Note that some users such as PlanariaLab may place copyright notices in their code.
@ChamDel78, so there isn’t much I can do now. :/
Put a tail rotor with no collisions into the hollow ring and put fuselages as a hub. Hope you can understand.
Nice biplane (with some unrealistic features). You could have used the command chip, instead of the odd cockpit.
Now that’s one of every cartoon villains’ favorite weapons of mass destruction. XD
This is great work. Some people might have trouble creating eyebrow windows on their airliner front fascia.
.
Now, using the same body, make the 737’s bigger cousin, the Boeing 707.
@Embedd, well, tell him how to read replies. There is a button named “notifications” right under your username besides the main, horizontal navigation tab (menu), if you click it.
.
Oh, I overlooked the successor auto-credit. Sorry about that.
@Ginger249, all the weapons might need to be eliminated. The weapons and accessories in where the hands should be should be replaced by 5 digit hands, like a human has, but robotic. You can make different versions with different configurations (like a military version with a gun on it’s arm), but the base (civilian) model should not have any.
.
P.S. You should post these versions as unlisted and then put links to said unlisted posts in the base model post’s description. I’ll give you how to link:
[name](url)Thanks.
Nice but it looks oversaturated with unnecessary weapons. Could you make a stripped-down version?
@Datsungamer04, I am just making sure, that so you write simple reviews in comments instead of creating complex and quite unnecessary forum posts that review every craft you have encountered. The “Gotcha” you said seems like a sign you need clarification, although I am not sure if you need it or not.
@Rafalemmm, okay but I don’t feel notifying you (via leaving a comment) for every single use is always necessary after all. A credit is usually enough.
That’s pretty nice but the wings appear too small and so is the tail.
@flightdesigner, if something breaks the rules, you are supposed to remove it ASAP. Go find the down arrow button besides the tags, then click “remove” to remove your post.
From the rules:
@ChamDel78 I lurked around the website years ago. Now I am present with an account at simpleplanes.com.
It looks like it came from a men’s luxury perfume advertisement. Otherwise, nice.
@ChamDel78, I did apply for the role but failed (otherwise, just accept it). What makes you think of me as a moderator?
The copyright and trademark lawyers are coming...