@Brayden1981, please be clear and constructive with your reply. I do not understand what it stands for (being merely consisting of 11 green squares with white ticks emojis and nothing else), despite implying appreciation of this post.
Did you forget the link to the plane and instead used a rickroll instead? If you do, go here (it’s, as of now, 7.7 years ago). Note that the “Dev comment” is missing there and the most recent comments (at the time of this comment) are about more than 5 years ago.
.
The box brining up this weird scrabble is, of course, because of bad internet.
@Tsuchiisan, yes I am Indonesian (you can find me in the Indonesian server), the same as you. There are other Indonesian users too, and I think you know some of them. Now why are you asking me this?
.
P.S. please don’t swear again.
@Th3rmoplylae, weak spots vary, and you cannot just program a missile to target a weak spot simply. It needs to use radar or infrared devices, so it can target a ship and all have a small chance to hit a weak spot, so there isn’t a high chance a guided missile could hit a weak spot and ships nowadays have stealth features to reduce weak spots.
@Th3rmoplylae, and if the missiles were destructive enough, the ship became very expensive, despite it’s size, because the missiles are very expensive.
Obviously, I know it is hard, but how are people going to board this semi-trailer truck if the ground clearance is too high. I suggest lowering the ground clearance, unless this is a monster truck for use in stadiums only.
. UPDATE, JUST FOUND OUT AN EARLIER PREDECESSOR TO THIS WAS POSTED ON THE SITE, AND IT HAD A TRAILER IN ADDITION TO IT’S MONSTER TRUCK GROUND CLEARANCE.
Hello, @Yurakap5. Welcome to the site. Please read the rules and follow them, so you won’t get into trouble.
.
Yes, this is indeed your first plane, and a lot of flaws come by. The entire plane is unusually chrome, too many weapons, the wings looks odd, the fuselage and nose cone looks odd, the cockpit fuselage is missing (you could have used fuselage slicing), and there is indeed no throttle or trim control (and yaw pedals). Try to improve your skills. If you don’t know how to do it, try to figure it out by yourself, and if you still did not, get help from other people (and make sure you follow the aforementioned rules and try and be patient, don’t throw tantrums if you didn’t get help). Enjoy the privilege of using this site.
Nice concept. Could drive around in multiplayer. Only thing I want to note are the lack of gun elevation and the wheels to cover the entire length of the vehicle. Note that I consider this an armored car, unless you somehow make “fake tracks”.
What if you replace the number 8 in a circle with the number 9, I wonder what would it look... ;)
.
Nice craft by the way. The window glass appears nonexistent, and the craft appears to have no smoothing.
Today, you tried to replicate an aircraft operated by a real life airline. You should try more with curving text labels, even modifying it’s XML file, via overload.
Nice craft. Where are the smoothing. Also, the engine configuration may mean problems, especially when just 2 VTOL nozzles and 2 straight nozzles won’t mean that the aircraft has VTOL capacity. And what is the use of the intake on top of the main body?
These paragraphs, apart from the challenge rules, last words quote, and deadline, seem to be irrelevant to said challenge itself. Also, are the rules too restrictive?
At least you got the basic idea of what a stealth aircraft looks like. It looks like a F-22, but some things need to be tweaked (like angling the inlets so they reduce radar cross-section).
That’s pretty nice, but the front is a bit off. Also, you should start using fuselage smoothing. The black lines need to be inline with the fuselage (try fuselage slicing to make it better).
@bosscai, by that “draw”, you are referring to a drawing that you deleted. Well, DeezDucks just commented this in said drawing post:
$Cope Yes, there is no actual build
Note: I have replaced the “@“ with a “$” to avoid tagging Cope.
.
PS: Try and look into the comments section of the user, if said user tags you on a removed build.
If you are bored and you still want to make SimplePlanes-related content and/or interact with the community, you can make films or music videos using SimplePlanes (please comply with copyright laws), or if you have the opportunity, make SimplePlanes update reviews, experimenting with physics, and/or build livestreams (you can show wacky and/or experimental builds like fighter jets with their main wings suspended below the fuselage).
.
However, if you are bored with SimplePlanes and the community, you could do something else like making music via LMMS (a free and open source program to create music), making animations, or even play other games (like SimpleRockets2). It’s up to you.
.
FYI:
Yes, I am, indeed, getting bored with SimplePlanes, especially when they aren’t user friendly for creating mechanisms, compared to SimpleRockets2 and the program is only limited to my computer, not a portable device. Also contributing is that I want to create content other than SimplePlanes. I am not telling you to leave, I am telling you what I am feeling right now.
Could be used in MultiPlayer, considering it does not have any aesthetics apart from being low enough to somewhat support MP.
.
Is there any propulsion (they do not work underwater)? Have you Set the fuselages to high buoyancy?
And don’t forget to put a redirect to the new, updated post on this old post of yours (instructions here, so users will ask to be redirected onto the new plane when they try to visit this old post.
I have never ever seen an IFV/APC with more than 8 (4 on each side) wheels. Therefore, I would still Imagine this is a tank that lacks a sprocket and an idler (except in very very few cases like the tetrarch tank), both are necessary for tracks. I think I will give you a pass with no tank tracks (or you could try and maybe improvise fake tank tracks).
Just to clarify.
.
@SPairforce, well, it’s okay to make simple jokes; however, please be careful with your wording, otherwise you might create a joke that might offend people (e.g. using racist slurs). As for the overused meme posts, as the meme is beginning to be overused, the quality of meme posts become poorer, becoming boring and seen as spam, leading people to complain (and moderators to forbid further poor-quality meme posts). Any post can be perceived by the community or part of such as rule breaking may result in drama, and can include what moderators consider to violate the rules (e.g. spam posts as mentioned by SodiumIodide and WiiMini (on some points)), or not (an anime girl walker that does not violate the rules banning sexually suggestive themes but perceived by the community as such, leading to controversy).
.
Do note that some groups (such as some anime fans) may be discriminated by the community for various reasons (although this seems to have died down in recent years).
.
Hope that helps.
Make the wheels wider, so the get more ground pressure. Also the front’s too long and the wheels are too much; is this supposed to be a tank with continuous tracks? If so, make it wider and flatter, so it looks like a real tank.
@GreatWizard, jadi, mengapa reupload? Kan kamu bisa highlight postingan engkau, dengan cara klik tombol sebelah kanan indikator “downloads”, terus klik teks “highlight”. Maka beres dong? Maaf kalau tidak ada orang yang mengupvote (tetapi tidak apa-apa Kalau tidak punya upvote, kan upvotes tidak berguna). Mari aku spotlight predecessor postingan ini.
I still do not know the correct solution. You describe the wheels as “jittering”. It might mean either less weight to the wheels (dubious) or just having no integrated frame.
.
A couple of solutions:
- Add a frame and attach the axles to said frame with free-rotating rotators.
- Add more weight to the wheels.
@Brayden1981, please be clear and constructive with your reply. I do not understand what it stands for (being merely consisting of 11 green squares with white ticks emojis and nothing else), despite implying appreciation of this post.
@Tsuchiisan, I actually don’t know, but all I can remember is that you got into trouble multiple times.
@U-Boat
It’s small
It’s fast
It’s slick
The best part is it’s
Right in this website...
You know what’s missing, the front wheel (although it still WIP, so I’ll let you build it).
Ah finally, you’re back...
Did you forget the link to the plane and instead used a rickroll instead? If you do, go here (it’s, as of now, 7.7 years ago). Note that the “Dev comment” is missing there and the most recent comments (at the time of this comment) are about more than 5 years ago.
.
The box brining up this weird scrabble is, of course, because of bad internet.
@Tsuchiisan, yes I am Indonesian (you can find me in the Indonesian server), the same as you. There are other Indonesian users too, and I think you know some of them. Now why are you asking me this?
.
P.S. please don’t swear again.
@Th3rmoplylae, weak spots vary, and you cannot just program a missile to target a weak spot simply. It needs to use radar or infrared devices, so it can target a ship and all have a small chance to hit a weak spot, so there isn’t a high chance a guided missile could hit a weak spot and ships nowadays have stealth features to reduce weak spots.
The world of luxury never ends, it keeps going on...
.
Nice yacht. The wood needs to be a series of long planks.
@Th3rmoplylae, and if the missiles were destructive enough, the ship became very expensive, despite it’s size, because the missiles are very expensive.
The first time I see this, it looks like an eggship. Could use in Multiplayer.
@DogeToTheMoon, yes, the new one looks similar to the Pacific P12.
Biggus greatus is here to stay.
Obviously, I know it is hard, but how are people going to board this semi-trailer truck if the ground clearance is too high. I suggest lowering the ground clearance, unless this is a monster truck for use in stadiums only.
.
UPDATE, JUST FOUND OUT AN EARLIER PREDECESSOR TO THIS WAS POSTED ON THE SITE, AND IT HAD A TRAILER IN ADDITION TO IT’S MONSTER TRUCK GROUND CLEARANCE.
Hello, @Yurakap5. Welcome to the site. Please read the rules and follow them, so you won’t get into trouble.
.
Yes, this is indeed your first plane, and a lot of flaws come by. The entire plane is unusually chrome, too many weapons, the wings looks odd, the fuselage and nose cone looks odd, the cockpit fuselage is missing (you could have used fuselage slicing), and there is indeed no throttle or trim control (and yaw pedals). Try to improve your skills. If you don’t know how to do it, try to figure it out by yourself, and if you still did not, get help from other people (and make sure you follow the aforementioned rules and try and be patient, don’t throw tantrums if you didn’t get help). Enjoy the privilege of using this site.
Nice concept. Could drive around in multiplayer. Only thing I want to note are the lack of gun elevation and the wheels to cover the entire length of the vehicle. Note that I consider this an armored car, unless you somehow make “fake tracks”.
This is such a nice try at making a framed canopy. Unfortunately, the plane does not look as close as the IRL plane though.
Finally, you made a really decent craft! :D
What if you replace the number 8 in a circle with the number 9, I wonder what would it look... ;)
.
Nice craft by the way. The window glass appears nonexistent, and the craft appears to have no smoothing.
Tag it as solved if it is really solved (usually by adding “[SOLVED]” to the title and adding the “Solved” tag).
Looks pretty nice. At least, give a backstory.
Today, you tried to replicate an aircraft operated by a real life airline. You should try more with curving text labels, even modifying it’s XML file, via overload.
You could remove the rotating cockpit thingy if you wish to, since this cockpit thingy is actually a placeholder. :)
This is pretty detailed an accurate. Maybe make a version using the Tracks II mod?
What does “proprietary engine” mean? If possible, please clarify.
Nice craft. Where are the smoothing. Also, the engine configuration may mean problems, especially when just 2 VTOL nozzles and 2 straight nozzles won’t mean that the aircraft has VTOL capacity. And what is the use of the intake on top of the main body?
@Bobyo, I wanna see the final product you made (and I hope I did not forget this)! (>&<)
These paragraphs, apart from the challenge rules, last words quote, and deadline, seem to be irrelevant to said challenge itself. Also, are the rules too restrictive?
At least you got the basic idea of what a stealth aircraft looks like. It looks like a F-22, but some things need to be tweaked (like angling the inlets so they reduce radar cross-section).
That’s pretty nice, but the front is a bit off. Also, you should start using fuselage smoothing. The black lines need to be inline with the fuselage (try fuselage slicing to make it better).
@bosscai, by that “draw”, you are referring to a drawing that you deleted. Well, DeezDucks just commented this in said drawing post:
Note: I have replaced the “@“ with a “$” to avoid tagging Cope.
.
PS: Try and look into the comments section of the user, if said user tags you on a removed build.
If you are bored and you still want to make SimplePlanes-related content and/or interact with the community, you can make films or music videos using SimplePlanes (please comply with copyright laws), or if you have the opportunity, make SimplePlanes update reviews, experimenting with physics, and/or build livestreams (you can show wacky and/or experimental builds like fighter jets with their main wings suspended below the fuselage).
.
However, if you are bored with SimplePlanes and the community, you could do something else like making music via LMMS (a free and open source program to create music), making animations, or even play other games (like SimpleRockets2). It’s up to you.
.
FYI:
Yes, I am, indeed, getting bored with SimplePlanes, especially when they aren’t user friendly for creating mechanisms, compared to SimpleRockets2 and the program is only limited to my computer, not a portable device. Also contributing is that I want to create content other than SimplePlanes. I am not telling you to leave, I am telling you what I am feeling right now.
Then will there be a spacecraft version of this plane?
Could be used in MultiPlayer, considering it does not have any aesthetics apart from being low enough to somewhat support MP.
.
Is there any propulsion (they do not work underwater)? Have you Set the fuselages to high buoyancy?
And don’t forget to put a redirect to the new, updated post on this old post of yours (instructions here, so users will ask to be redirected onto the new plane when they try to visit this old post.
I have never ever seen an IFV/APC with more than 8 (4 on each side) wheels. Therefore, I would still Imagine this is a tank that lacks a sprocket and an idler (except in very very few cases like the tetrarch tank), both are necessary for tracks. I think I will give you a pass with no tank tracks (or you could try and maybe improvise fake tank tracks).
@Phoebe, as in USN aircraft.
That is the F-18 Super Hornet, is it?
Ah yes, T-35, the Char 2C of the Soviet Union.
@Bobyo, it looks too much like a tank than an IFV to me.
.
You already know what an IFV looks like. Go make it shorter and the wheels wider!
Just to clarify.
.
@SPairforce, well, it’s okay to make simple jokes; however, please be careful with your wording, otherwise you might create a joke that might offend people (e.g. using racist slurs). As for the overused meme posts, as the meme is beginning to be overused, the quality of meme posts become poorer, becoming boring and seen as spam, leading people to complain (and moderators to forbid further poor-quality meme posts). Any post can be perceived by the community or part of such as rule breaking may result in drama, and can include what moderators consider to violate the rules (e.g. spam posts as mentioned by SodiumIodide and WiiMini (on some points)), or not (an anime girl walker that does not violate the rules banning sexually suggestive themes but perceived by the community as such, leading to controversy).
.
Do note that some groups (such as some anime fans) may be discriminated by the community for various reasons (although this seems to have died down in recent years).
.
Hope that helps.
Make the wheels wider, so the get more ground pressure. Also the front’s too long and the wheels are too much; is this supposed to be a tank with continuous tracks? If so, make it wider and flatter, so it looks like a real tank.
Did you get a notification?
You got me...
And now, @AndrewGarrison, it’s time to make images of you to become my first [REDACTED]!
@GreatWizard, jadi, mengapa reupload? Kan kamu bisa highlight postingan engkau, dengan cara klik tombol sebelah kanan indikator “downloads”, terus klik teks “highlight”. Maka beres dong? Maaf kalau tidak ada orang yang mengupvote (tetapi tidak apa-apa Kalau tidak punya upvote, kan upvotes tidak berguna). Mari aku spotlight predecessor postingan ini.
@mahardika , yes. It looks more refined than the mounting vehicle, making me suspicious you used another one’s part.
Ok, but where did the missile turret come from? Vehicle looks back-heavy.
In SP MultiPlayer, I met a person who annoys people with swear words and so on. I haven’t seen said person since.
@P1T1KU, and finally, you’ve come back after a very long vacation.
I still do not know the correct solution. You describe the wheels as “jittering”. It might mean either less weight to the wheels (dubious) or just having no integrated frame.
.
A couple of solutions:
- Add a frame and attach the axles to said frame with free-rotating rotators.
- Add more weight to the wheels.