AutoTags: @BeastHunter @Sergio666 @MrCOPTY
Simulated Missions
T
@Mustang51 i agree with you.
@BluestBoi no, but close
@BluestBoi yeah, it's pretty hard for me to get the nose right, any guess on the aircraft?
@Pilot2659 Thanks
@Pilot2659 okay
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes i mostly dont do it because im pretty bad with screenshots, but i'll try to do it for my upcoming Mirage-IIIE.
@Aarav hi
Fixed It
@FlirBlitz Okay....
@100 if you ask for a Tag, do it in this post : Click Here
WIP Mirage-IIIE Help-Needed : Here
@BeastHunter maybe you can help
Pretty good 👍 There is too much pitch-maneuverability and not enough roll-maneuverability but it's still a good build.
@Micmekox almost, it is indeed a Mirage, but not the F1
The F-22 is called Raptor not Velociraptor, also, Pretty good build 👍
Velociraptor
@UnfairchildFH227 Okay
Here is my entry to your Challenge : https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Z06X4f/Grumman-F-75-Shark
AutoTags: @BorgirFlugzeugbau
T Also, you're so lucky to have seen one
@Dogedogebread13 well, you can still spawn it manually anyway.
@Cahyoneil go read the rules
This is against the rules
@TASTEinc Yeah
@BorgirFlugzeugbau Thanks
@Yourlocalhuman @TASTEinc the Ar-234 could not carry the Fritz-X
This Bf-109K4 has a pretty good start-up : https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/09vo6u/109-Challenge-Messerschmitt-BF-109-K-4
@MrCOPTY Thanks😊
Can you make a FW-190 with he same building style and an engine startup ?
I personally prefer Sim.
Tag me when released
@MaxStoneCro1 Thank you, challenges are an good way to earn point and gain experience
@Mustang51 Thanks
AutoTags: @BeastHunter @Sergio666 @MrCopty
Mach 3.69 is not Hypersonic. however, speed faster than Mach 5 is Hypersonic. Also, Pretty Nice 👍
Flügel
@Neruneten21 Okay
AutoTags:
+2@BeastHunter
@Sergio666
@MrCOPTY
Simulated Missions
+1T
+1@Mustang51 i agree with you.
+1@BluestBoi no, but close
@BluestBoi yeah, it's pretty hard for me to get the nose right, any guess on the aircraft?
@Pilot2659 Thanks
+1@Pilot2659 okay
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes i mostly dont do it because im pretty bad with screenshots, but i'll try to do it for my upcoming Mirage-IIIE.
@Aarav hi
Fixed It
@FlirBlitz Okay....
+1@100 if you ask for a Tag, do it in this post : Click Here
WIP Mirage-IIIE Help-Needed : Here
@BeastHunter maybe you can help
T
+1Pretty good 👍
There is too much pitch-maneuverability and not enough roll-maneuverability but it's still a good build.
T
@Micmekox almost, it is indeed a Mirage, but not the F1
The F-22 is called Raptor not
Velociraptor, also, Pretty good build 👍@UnfairchildFH227 Okay
+1Here is my entry to your Challenge : https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Z06X4f/Grumman-F-75-Shark
+1AutoTags:
@BorgirFlugzeugbau
AutoTags:
+1@BeastHunter
@Sergio666
@MrCOPTY
T
+1Also, you're so lucky to have seen one
@Dogedogebread13 well, you can still spawn it manually anyway.
@Cahyoneil go read the rules
This is against the rules
+1@TASTEinc Yeah
@BorgirFlugzeugbau Thanks
+1@Yourlocalhuman @TASTEinc the Ar-234 could not carry the Fritz-X
AutoTags:
+1@BeastHunter
@Sergio666
@MrCOPTY
AutoTags:
@BorgirFlugzeugbau
This Bf-109K4 has a pretty good start-up : https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/09vo6u/109-Challenge-Messerschmitt-BF-109-K-4
+1T
T
@MrCOPTY Thanks😊
+1T
Can you make a FW-190 with he same building style and an engine startup ?
T
I personally prefer Sim.
Tag me when released
@MaxStoneCro1 Thank you, challenges are an good way to earn point and gain experience
+1@Mustang51 Thanks
AutoTags:
+1@BeastHunter
@Sergio666
@MrCopty
AutoTags:
@BorgirFlugzeugbau
Mach 3.69 is not Hypersonic. however, speed faster than Mach 5 is Hypersonic.
+3Also, Pretty Nice 👍
Flügel
@Neruneten21 Okay
T