@blt it does, but PEA puts the Simple back into simpleplanes. I don't understand the hate behind PEA. Some people may misuse the title, but Part Efficiency is something this site needs more of
@blt the mobile friendly tag is a bit vague. To me, PEA means realistic, good looking planes that are below 100 parts. Part Efficient planes have more flexibility than high part models
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I know, but the name "AC-130" and images lead me to believe that this was the gunship variant, and that you have posted the wrong version
@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 just tested it, it works at Yeager Airport on low and medium (haven't tested on high), but it doesn't work at Wright Airport, which is where I play a vast majority of the time
@dussts if I may make a vehicle suggestion, could you please make a Ford Model T? There are no low part Model Ts on here, and I would love to see you make it
@bennyhhy this is amazing, a functional, low part TOW! Next time, don't attach the camera to the moving part, it shifts the camera view too far. Just center it relative to the rotators, and attach it to a non moving part
I hope to see cars with below 100 parts for those of us who have weak devices or want to spawn other things. Idk about interiors, just efficient use of parts
@dackyjones you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@t10m What changed?
@LowQualityRepublic they claim t10m is their other account. Also, the title says "(fix some problems)", so they added something to it
@Rob119 @mod https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4jlVlo/tank-is-6-simple
+2This post shows littlenika admitting that t10m is their other account
@IDK0 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1You're good 👍, just thought it was interesting
+1@LunarEclipseSP Correct, thank you
+1https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Wasp
@dabestsock https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/iLV4kk/VH-Toyota
@dabestsock I kinda did
The ZAZ-968 wasn't a front engined car, it was rear engined, as evidenced by the air scoops at the rear
+1@MoriSamaSP you should add tags so people can see this in the future, it's a very nice plane
She up on my load
@Boeing727200E you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Avgeekaviationfan122 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Rizik23 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@THAI1143 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Convex please remember to add tags, you make great planes! I don't want them to end up only being accessible with the search bar
@Rizik23 can you please add tags, your planes don't deserve to be banished to the search bar
+2@Convex you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@MoriSamaSP you should add tags so people can see this in the future
@Convex this is a very nice replica, you should add more tags so people can see this in the future
Good lord
+1@Rizik23 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@blt it does, but PEA puts the Simple back into simpleplanes. I don't understand the hate behind PEA. Some people may misuse the title, but Part Efficiency is something this site needs more of
@blt the mobile friendly tag is a bit vague. To me, PEA means realistic, good looking planes that are below 100 parts. Part Efficient planes have more flexibility than high part models
+1@Rizik23 you should add tags so people can see this in the future
Absolute banger, we finally have a low part Mule!
@KarakalMaschinenbauAnlage you should add tags so people can see this in the future
This may have not been an entry, but I'm glad it was in the successors, cause I would have never found this gem otherwise
@dabestsock I have no idea on how to make a towed plane. The glider just keeps going ahead and pulling the tow plane around
@dabestsock Can you clarify? Do you want me to add a C-47 tow plane?
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I know, but the name "AC-130" and images lead me to believe that this was the gunship variant, and that you have posted the wrong version
@Pakdaaircraftindustries where are the guns?
@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 If it's alright, can you please make a Boys anti-tank rifle?
@ARandomGuyj7j you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1@Verglas you should add tags so people can see this in the future
+1Good to know! I have noticed the Barrage and Redcon Flak self-destructs at default, but not my custom location
+1@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 just tested it, it works at Yeager Airport on low and medium (haven't tested on high), but it doesn't work at Wright Airport, which is where I play a vast majority of the time
+1What the
+2@WritersCrusadersAirCo2 your tanks don't shoot me with their main gun, do you have any idea why? I'm on android, on medium physics at Wright Airport
Publishing
+1@dussts if I may make a vehicle suggestion, could you please make a Ford Model T? There are no low part Model Ts on here, and I would love to see you make it
"part efficient"
Curse of the tire screech
+1You can see what I did here:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9IGD95/AT-TOW
@bennyhhy this is amazing, a functional, low part TOW! Next time, don't attach the camera to the moving part, it shifts the camera view too far. Just center it relative to the rotators, and attach it to a non moving part
@CatdogAerospace you should add tags so people can see this in the future
I hope to see cars with below 100 parts for those of us who have weak devices or want to spawn other things. Idk about interiors, just efficient use of parts
+1@llDeadboyll you should add tags so people can see this in the future