You have to use xml. A mod called overload is great for this. In the rotator set the max degrees to 180, then using overload go to the inputs section. Here you should see a Max variable, default at 1. Set this to a very high number, however somewhere around 1e+30 I think it might stop working. Technically it will stop sometime, though you'd probably not live to see it stop.
@klm747klm747 This isn't relevant to this post, however to set drag to 0 using overload, set the dragScale to 0. Make sure you press the tick to confirm your change . Also, you may need to turn the drag indicator off and on again, to recalculate the drag properly and show the correct readings. I'm looking forward to the finished plane!
I like the sound of the Oerlikon, other than that it's really old but still in use today. I found it ironic it was made in Switzerland, famously know for being neutral in both world wars, then was used by the Axis and Allies in WW2.
I have a book on the RAF's major advancements, I take some sources from it in this, though these might not be 100% reliable:
It could have been fitted to Mk 1a Spitfires. The Hispano cannon was fitted in late 1940, where Spitfires and Hurricanes were the RAF's main fighters. My source doesn't specify which variant of spitfire it was though it does say Spitfires took 2 cannon in the wing in 1941. In tests in using Hispanos for Spitfires is not completely unreasonable to assume they used Mk1a Spitfires as they would have been the dominant variant at the time.
For your second question, yes the Spitfire Mk1a had flaps. I actually think all variants of spitfire had flaps, save perhaps the early prototypes. The flaps were split wing design, extending nearly 90 degrees judging by the look, used only for landing. There was only 1 flap setting on spitfires, controlled by a single switch.
@Minecraftpoweer I haven't heard the greatest things about the X, is it really that good? I'd recommend a Samsung, mainly because the interface and screen are clearer and larger, I own an Iphone though so who am I to say? :P
It's its own class as far as I know. Classes seem to be based upon a ship's role and technology. That's how I see it at least, there doesn't seem to be much information regarding how ship classes are assigned.
I generally see bush planes as rugged and affordable. Most don't have retractable landing gear, and many mount floats and skis. Landing gear is also generally big to accommodate for rough runways. Try a yellow and black or red and white paint job, these seem to be popular choices...
@Tully2001 The Su 35 is basically a direct upgrade to the Su 27, in fact wikipedia says that the first variants of these aircraft were designated Su 27M. So technically your guess of Su 27 was right...
@Irobert55 The thing is that they fold these wings out into 'attack position' IN SPACE.
Making sense of things that weren't meant to make sense is hard but I have to admit really fun. :P
110.
@DemonSniper8 I had a suspicion, it's just I didn't want to say Delphinus was Delphinos incase I was wrong (which I quite often am). :P
Just one thing: the sight seems a bit small to look down?
@KingHandspider Oh you didn't reply so I didn't know :P
I'll be on now :D
@KingHandspider Well I'll be on in 10 minutes if you want.
At certain times yes. Timezones are a thing :P
I'll join too :D
what
I'd happily help, despite having little experience building cars.
I guess I can try :P
Yesss... Yessssss... Yesssssssss...
Early spits (Spitfire Mk1) had a round trigger.
wat.avi
You have to use xml. A mod called overload is great for this. In the rotator set the max degrees to 180, then using overload go to the inputs section. Here you should see a Max variable, default at 1. Set this to a very high number, however somewhere around 1e+30 I think it might stop working. Technically it will stop sometime, though you'd probably not live to see it stop.
Great from a distance! How does it look close up?
@klm747klm747 This isn't relevant to this post, however to set drag to 0 using overload, set the dragScale to 0. Make sure you press the tick to confirm your change . Also, you may need to turn the drag indicator off and on again, to recalculate the drag properly and show the correct readings. I'm looking forward to the finished plane!
This might not be a bad fit either...
It's like a hybrid between a Ho 229 and a XP 55...
Reminds me of my first build...
I have to say, you definitely beat me :P
Damn there's some real gold stuff in here that I missed :P
1.5 years and still going :D
Granted, I don't build much but I'm here...
I like the sound of the Oerlikon, other than that it's really old but still in use today. I found it ironic it was made in Switzerland, famously know for being neutral in both world wars, then was used by the Axis and Allies in WW2.
Should you? Shouldn't you? You should!
thx Stalin
Cool! Is there a reason you couldn't finish it?
I have a book on the RAF's major advancements, I take some sources from it in this, though these might not be 100% reliable:
It could have been fitted to Mk 1a Spitfires. The Hispano cannon was fitted in late 1940, where Spitfires and Hurricanes were the RAF's main fighters. My source doesn't specify which variant of spitfire it was though it does say Spitfires took 2 cannon in the wing in 1941. In tests in using Hispanos for Spitfires is not completely unreasonable to assume they used Mk1a Spitfires as they would have been the dominant variant at the time.
For your second question, yes the Spitfire Mk1a had flaps. I actually think all variants of spitfire had flaps, save perhaps the early prototypes. The flaps were split wing design, extending nearly 90 degrees judging by the look, used only for landing. There was only 1 flap setting on spitfires, controlled by a single switch.
My unpopular opinion:
I actually dislike the B 17 and Lancaster nose designs, they just look really stubby and messy to me.
@MAHADI Oh thanks! I am working on a new spitfire which should incorporate a full airfoil design.
It's DRY!
Toast? Wait that's rhyming...
Well spectre would be my guess...
Teeeeeeeeeeels
@BlackhattAircraft I was thinking of the Ki 61, I've got a bad memory...
Anyway, looking at the Ki 84 I would definitely like to see one of these!
EGG B29 vs Normal B29
XF-85 Goblin vs F86 Sabre
@BlackhattAircraft Well it's basically a Japanese Bf-109, but sure...
@BlackhattAircraft You got it! I mean they even made a song about it...
Ki 43 Hayabusa!
@Minecraftpoweer I haven't heard the greatest things about the X, is it really that good? I'd recommend a Samsung, mainly because the interface and screen are clearer and larger, I own an Iphone though so who am I to say? :P
Hard to determine without looking at the plane:
Is the drag, CoM and CoL symmetrical, is the CoM clearly ahead of the CoL?
Are the elevators surfaces very large; I know large elevators can cause instability.
Is the rudder central and decently sized? Is it large enough to keep the plane stable?
There appears to be a few meanings for SP...
The worst part is SimplePlanes isn't on that list :(
@XjayIndustrys tbh it's a bit late to reply to this...
It's its own class as far as I know. Classes seem to be based upon a ship's role and technology. That's how I see it at least, there doesn't seem to be much information regarding how ship classes are assigned.
I generally see bush planes as rugged and affordable. Most don't have retractable landing gear, and many mount floats and skis. Landing gear is also generally big to accommodate for rough runways. Try a yellow and black or red and white paint job, these seem to be popular choices...
@Tully2001 The Su 35 is basically a direct upgrade to the Su 27, in fact wikipedia says that the first variants of these aircraft were designated Su 27M. So technically your guess of Su 27 was right...
@Tully2001 Su 35 doesn't have canards...?
@TheDerpingMemes I got the numbers right :P
I think the wings could be a bit more swept back and it's a bit short but good job! :D
MiG 35?
@Irobert55 The thing is that they fold these wings out into 'attack position' IN SPACE.
Making sense of things that weren't meant to make sense is hard but I have to admit really fun. :P
@Minecraftpoweer I think some people find it easier.
Personally I fail to see how. :P
I use the keyboard for standard flying in orbit view. For aiming at targets I use the mouse in cockpit view.
Frame shift drive charging...