Okay, do not get us wrong, but actually, all people should read and take all of those negative critism and comments to make ourself better. Those stuff should make you to become better, and not to repeat the same mistake again ;-)
At your aircraft's CoM, place another verticle stabilizer in the body without any control surface, exactly at CoM. Then, re-edit the yaw control surface size or position or both, until the yaw is stable
We did check our archieves @AviownCorp and we did not find any exact or strong details about that creature. Unless, we have a precise details about its class, sub-order, order, and species, which then we can list it as our next TYPE project,
Hahaha, no worries @Tessemi but, actually, most of mr del's dudes did tell him that. Plus, mr del did design an actual car before, but meh, he move to XDA Developers
Great aircraft here, but there are few thing that you need to fix, consider, and do at the next time... The rear landing gears are far at the back too much, which makes more difficult for the aircraft to face up, and take off. make sure the landing gear is close but not to close to CoM... Another thing is, make sure the aircraft's body is wide enough, which should give a more wider area for you to place those landing gears, which should improve stability on the ground while landing.
Ahh, @Rawhide , we did some overall test with multiple devices from multiple range... We understand that most mid-end devices with at least 4 cores CPU and 2GB of RAM are capable of running up to 350 parts... Most low-end devices with at least 2 cores CPU and 1GB of RAM are capable of running up to 250 parts... Also, most entry-level devices with at least 1 core of CPU and 512MB of RAM are capable of running up to 60 parts... So, for our standard, we tag our planes with below 150 parts as Mobile Friendly, and our planes with below 50 parts as Low Edition.
this is mr delph typing @AviownCorp and thank you dude. But, it is not really depends on luck though.
All you need is just to find one, someone that is nice, kind, understand, etc. But if there is none, or less, all you need it to guide them, until you two are understand and happy together
Anything that is wrong, correct it. Something is wrong, discuss together to find a solution. Having a little fight, check yourself first, then your wife. Do not get mad, and always guide your wife with nice and happines way ;-)
By the way, mrs D is not really into plane though. Only that, we share the same interest, which is designing. Sometimes, when we build a new plane, mrs D is the one who always re-check the whole plane, to search for errors, and mention it to me lol
How about you @AviownCorp ? any news?
Okay, do not get us wrong, but actually, all people should read and take all of those negative critism and comments to make ourself better. Those stuff should make you to become better, and not to repeat the same mistake again ;-)
+1At your aircraft's CoM, place another verticle stabilizer in the body without any control surface, exactly at CoM. Then, re-edit the yaw control surface size or position or both, until the yaw is stable
+3Ahh, that dolphin-like dino @AviownCorp well currently at 30% progress, hehehe
+1What is the matter? Something's wrong?
Congratulations sir
Maybe there is something with your main and tail wings. usually, by mirroring both sides fix it
there is a trick, hehehe
+1We did check our archieves @AviownCorp and we did not find any exact or strong details about that creature. Unless, we have a precise details about its class, sub-order, order, and species, which then we can list it as our next TYPE project,
By the way, at what year is this aircraft?
Yup, we did test that XD
Hahaha, no worries @Tessemi but, actually, most of mr del's dudes did tell him that. Plus, mr del did design an actual car before, but meh, he move to XDA Developers
+1You rules!
Great aircraft here, but there are few thing that you need to fix, consider, and do at the next time... The rear landing gears are far at the back too much, which makes more difficult for the aircraft to face up, and take off. make sure the landing gear is close but not to close to CoM... Another thing is, make sure the aircraft's body is wide enough, which should give a more wider area for you to place those landing gears, which should improve stability on the ground while landing.
+1Masterpiece!
Nice one!
we like your style awesome sir
We like your style sir
Alright, understood sir
+1It is OK, and be patient dude. Think positive, like maybe there are not much people online at that time
for extra comfort XD
+1Masterpiece dude!
+1By the way, we flew this thing, and it was amaaaaaaaaaaaazing
+1Dude, we have never see you into vehicle. How about push your designing and building limits, with vehicles?
+1Because we want to build it @CursedFlames
A tapeworm @FuzzyAircraftProductions
It got no wheels @robloxweponco and it was not designed for a launch vehicle and aircraft carrier
@AviownCorp
Lol @JohnnyBoythePilot well,
- real-life answer : yes
- SP-based answer : the shark itself will explode
+1Well, we do have it @AviownCorp hahaha
+1We fixed the description @robloxweponco lol, it was copied from our other text editor
Hey, check this dude out @ThePrototype , and his/her stuff ;-)
Lmao @Blackburn we are delphinus, those couple, who enjoy SP together, hahahah
No need to @Blackburn because we still keep all of our stuff
We can fix that though @Blackburn by simply giving feedbacks, and there is no need for you to upload it
Be more precise, which problem @Blackburn ?
Feel free to check out some of our Low Edition stuff @Rawhide if you want something with much more lower parts count from us ;-)
Ahh, @Rawhide , we did some overall test with multiple devices from multiple range... We understand that most mid-end devices with at least 4 cores CPU and 2GB of RAM are capable of running up to 350 parts... Most low-end devices with at least 2 cores CPU and 1GB of RAM are capable of running up to 250 parts... Also, most entry-level devices with at least 1 core of CPU and 512MB of RAM are capable of running up to 60 parts... So, for our standard, we tag our planes with below 150 parts as Mobile Friendly, and our planes with below 50 parts as Low Edition.
Hey @MercuryCorporation , do this help you out?
Well @AviownCorp of course, because we take the Caproni ca.60 as our inspiration XD
+1Lmao, how do you define that "allergy" @AviownCorp ? XD
Alright, we are in
R.I.P normal Jeep XD
Masterpiece dude!
Masterpiece!
Lmao @MasterCool7890 we did not expect it to master that, hahaha
this is mr delph typing @AviownCorp and thank you dude. But, it is not really depends on luck though.
All you need is just to find one, someone that is nice, kind, understand, etc. But if there is none, or less, all you need it to guide them, until you two are understand and happy together
Anything that is wrong, correct it. Something is wrong, discuss together to find a solution. Having a little fight, check yourself first, then your wife. Do not get mad, and always guide your wife with nice and happines way ;-)
By the way, mrs D is not really into plane though. Only that, we share the same interest, which is designing. Sometimes, when we build a new plane, mrs D is the one who always re-check the whole plane, to search for errors, and mention it to me lol
Dude, you are really great with dragon!
+4By the way, here is our entry
Dude, you rules!