@jamesPLANESii I made an imitation of the landing gear niches and perfectly adjusted the details under the wing bend, so it will be quite difficult to move the chassis, but I will try.
@Othawne I noticed it too. However, due to the overall design, it will be difficult to enlarge them. However, there is a chance that I will do it. In any case, it would be nice if you tell me how much they need to be increased.
with all due respect ... but it is very bad ... the wing is done very carelessly, one rudder does not work, there is no steering wheel, a flat emblem, some empty cockpit ... I cannot appreciate it. The F-86 was much better ... very sorry, I was expecting something outstanding :(
@Johndfg I mean, your plane with good detail will be in 1200-1500 parts. At the same time, my plane without cockpit and almost without detail has already 800 parts. The question was how do you save the parts?
Why does my cockpit-less plane have 800 parts? But he has not completed yet, and there will be 1000+ parts? How do you make highly detailed airplanes with cockpit using 1200-1500 parts ???
@EternalDarkness «UPD. A friend also suggested the possibility of restoring posts during the day, because you can accidentally delete not what you need.»
Очень низкопробный и непродуманный крафт. Плохая детализация, как такие тонкое нижнее крыло должно выдержать вес самолета на земле? Почему нет распорок между крыльями? Детализация 0, форма некрасивая. По сравнению с твоим первым самолетом он убог. Твой первый самолет был намного более красивым. Ну серьёзно, посмотри сам.
@Thecatbaron about your plane?
it is much better than the bone. it's not worth borrowing his style, you can do much more
Width: 10.5m
Length: 25,5m
Height: 6.1m
...
Phahahahahahahahaha
@Dllama4 However, I don’t need it anymore XD
fender, keel and stabilizers are bad enough, but the fuselage and dashboard are amazing
Sorry for google translate
Сan i use this wonderful machine gun turret?
157*
ЭДСУ - это хорошо... Ввели бы лучше на основу
+1@Jacobdaniel lol, just pictures
+2@suggestivecarp “upvote”?
@jamesPLANESii I made an imitation of the landing gear niches and perfectly adjusted the details under the wing bend, so it will be quite difficult to move the chassis, but I will try.
@getorge когда вставляешь картинку, в квадратных скобках можно написать описание и оно будет под картинкой, но у меня почему-то не получилось
@getorge слышб как сделать шобы описание к картинкам было видно?
@WarHawk95 No, this is a fictional plane, inspired by such aircraft as La-5FN, P-47D and Ki-84
+1@Othawne I noticed it too. However, due to the overall design, it will be difficult to enlarge them. However, there is a chance that I will do it. In any case, it would be nice if you tell me how much they need to be increased.
@WarHawk95 getorge
with all due respect ... but it is very bad ... the wing is done very carelessly, one rudder does not work, there is no steering wheel, a flat emblem, some empty cockpit ... I cannot appreciate it. The F-86 was much better ... very sorry, I was expecting something outstanding :(
Sorry for using Google Translator
ИЛС только бы было нелпохо сделать прозрачным. А еще лучше - рабочим.
@Johndfg I mean, your plane with good detail will be in 1200-1500 parts. At the same time, my plane without cockpit and almost without detail has already 800 parts. The question was how do you save the parts?
Why does my cockpit-less plane have 800 parts? But he has not completed yet, and there will be 1000+ parts? How do you make highly detailed airplanes with cockpit using 1200-1500 parts ???
Сыро. Недоделанно. Без детализации. Апвойт.
+3My opinion is that mods containing parts are bad. But the ship is very good.
FFFFFFFEEEEEAAAAAAATUUUUUUUUUREEEEEEEED
+1Why
Аоаоаоа ммм)))
+1This craft is more worthy to be feautured than crafts which are feautured now!!!
@Tully2001
@EnternalDarkness
This craft is more worthy to be feautured than crafts which are feautured now!!!
+9@Tully2001
@EnternalDarkness
Нууууу, без 128-мм... Ну я так не играю
+1the plane is good, the anime is bad
+2Ну тип даже норм, но 183 в современных реалиях бессмысленна. Лучше поставить 127-мм скорострельную пушку.
@Valiant2017 thnks for spotlight))0)
@Spacedoge12345plane my English isn’t perfect, so I can’t understand you ¯_(ツ)_/¯
+2@Spacedoge12345plane The fuselage block does not create ascensional power. It creates a panel, hidden inside the fuselage block.
+1@Thundrhawk1 I was inspired by it and P-35
@Thundrhawk1 it’s fictional plane. See tags
@Pilot72 It’s realistic XD
пасибо за спотлайт, @MOPCKOEDNISHE
+1@EternalDarkness «UPD. A friend also suggested the possibility of restoring posts during the day, because you can accidentally delete not what you need.»
+1Ну тогда фи тебе моё @RussianAS
А еще, посколько это утка и у нее ПГО, рули на этом самом ПГО должны двигаться в другую сторону, нежели сейчас (я про внешнюю составляющую)
(придирки от Виталика [2], еее)
Ууууууууу, а крыло-то не переменной толщины, уууууу (придирки от Виталика,еее)
Мой последний спотлайт, ибо ты скоро меня обгонишь;)
@Marine cockpit is more like 767
767?
Bravo! Great progress!
+1Blohm & Voss BV 141 on steroids
Is it an Aerodyne?
@Kingflyer1 ok np
It's not your plane! original is here https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/BWxf04/Foamboard
+1Очень низкопробный и непродуманный крафт. Плохая детализация, как такие тонкое нижнее крыло должно выдержать вес самолета на земле? Почему нет распорок между крыльями? Детализация 0, форма некрасивая. По сравнению с твоим первым самолетом он убог. Твой первый самолет был намного более красивым. Ну серьёзно, посмотри сам.
+1