Well, you could bind the control surfaces of the aircraft to an activation group. Then you could bind the turret controls to the other activation group. Thus, the turret can be controlled with pitch and roll controls. However, you lose control of the aircraft when the activation group binding the control surfaces is toggled off.
@EH21122005 I was thinking of something like a mix between the cl-44 and the 747 combi. Basically, the tail would be designed to swing to the side in order for outsize cargo like nuclear warheads to be loaded. All for the extra profit on long and thin routes.
@EH21122005 if this aircraft were real, it would probably be safe from lawsuits considering that it's quite an original design. That is until someone realises that these aircraft are quite explosive.
@BrianAircraftsNew Try braking.
@Jasonlanase soviet stronk
@Macer23T Thanks!
@dragunove29 Indeed
@Verterium Thank you!
@NativeChief1492 @Othawne Thanks!
@ForeverPie Thanks! I could have made it into a L1011 ripoff, but I decided that the S-duct would be too complicated for the thrust reverse "system".
k
@MasonJ thanks, Though it did take me two years and plenty of trial and error to get here.
The mass scale was 0. It should be around 0.05, you fool of a Took.
@flaro Thanks! All I needed to do this was some xml modding and nudging.
@Thebigbookofsimpleplanes Thank you!
@NativeChief1492 @Patrick20206 Thank you!
@Treadmill103 Indeed it is
@TAplanes Thank you!
@Verterium @WilliamBoeing Thanks!
@Patrick202206 Thanks!
@TheBigEgg Thanks! It only took me half an hour to build it with spare parts.
@ForeverPie Thank you!
@Verterium @AircroftDesigin Thanks!
@FighterCrafter14 Its actually cross between the An-124, An-225, C-141 and the product of a plane that I built a few years ago in minecraft.
@FighterCrafter14 Quite close
@Verterium Oh yes, it takes a few minutes.
oh no is anschluss
@Djbanana @1918 @RedHawk @AviownCorp @UnknownNate @TAplanes @JackTheBestBoss @TheBigEgg Thank you! Here is a picture of a barrel bomb.
@UnknownNate Its not a coincidence. I actually removed a few parts just so that this aircraft could have a part count of 420.
@MethaManAircraft Thanks!
@Rcb1235 Thank you!
@AccipitrisEnterprises Thanks!
@Hayhayjam664 @LiamW @BogdanX @Pilotmario @Rcb1235 @AviownCorp @BrianAircraftsNew @QuantumSandwich Thank you!
@PINK @MrSilverWolf @Liquidfox Thanks!
@Supercraft888 If the propeller has a chord scale of around 10 or so, it can work underwater.
@GermanAircrafts I have smaller identical ones on some of my other "spy" aircraft.
@GermanAircrafts Well, it spins, but it does nothing other than being a giant lazy Susan.
@ForeverPie It definitely is, though an alternate use for the dish would be to remove it and use it as a giant lazy Susan.
@UnknownNate Thank you!
@Tully2001 This is actually a converted airliner.
@Tully2001 Thanks!
Well, you could bind the control surfaces of the aircraft to an activation group. Then you could bind the turret controls to the other activation group. Thus, the turret can be controlled with pitch and roll controls. However, you lose control of the aircraft when the activation group binding the control surfaces is toggled off.
@XxcreedexX Thank you!
@AviownCorp Thanks!
@Rcb1235 Thank you!
@PyroManiac Please show me the way to one of those so I can umm.... avoid them.
@EH21122005 I was thinking of something like a mix between the cl-44 and the 747 combi. Basically, the tail would be designed to swing to the side in order for outsize cargo like nuclear warheads to be loaded. All for the extra profit on long and thin routes.
@EH21122005 if this aircraft were real, it would probably be safe from lawsuits considering that it's quite an original design. That is until someone realises that these aircraft are quite explosive.
I do not want to see those "schools"
@AudioDud3 Thanks!
@PaderiegeZ np!
@Rcb1235 Thank you!
@AviownCorp Thanks!