Post has been redirected to the MCV because A-X is spreading false information about the Challenger lineup stealing from the M-803 Bradley, of which he has ZERO proof. the Challenger lineup is a completely original tank that was created out of my own mistake from attempting to build the T-34 Model 1942. Do not believe ANYTHING he says.
Just a small warning: This is a heavily, heavily, heavily heavily HEAVILY HEAVILY work in progress destroyer. The problems include buoyancy, balance, firepower, weapons, mobility etc.
Expect this to not be out very quickly. Hell, this may even be a forgotten build, lost in my unlisted vehicles like most of my other ads.
The MCV1 is a replacement for the LCMBT-105 Challenger I, automatically forcing the LCMBT into a prototype role, not a production. The original description of the Challenger I is now redundant to the LCR lore and timeline, and anachronistic.
@MrVaultech Turret rear, and hull front. The only thing that can theoretically punch through both is ATGMs or AGMs.
@EpicBullDog sure, go ahead, if I may ask, what for?
@Souplane The POS "plane" you posted without my permission is literally worse performing than the F-34.
mfw i forget insignias
german mustang*
@L3FTxR1GHT can i make an improved german corsair
NOOO
everyone share it round
@William2315 the MiG-15 is called the Fagot.
@Astro12 thank
Post has been redirected to the MCV because A-X is spreading false information about the Challenger lineup stealing from the M-803 Bradley, of which he has ZERO proof. the Challenger lineup is a completely original tank that was created out of my own mistake from attempting to build the T-34 Model 1942. Do not believe ANYTHING he says.
Just a small warning: This is a heavily, heavily, heavily heavily HEAVILY HEAVILY work in progress destroyer. The problems include buoyancy, balance, firepower, weapons, mobility etc.
Expect this to not be out very quickly. Hell, this may even be a forgotten build, lost in my unlisted vehicles like most of my other ads.
@KipSqueaks I'm sorry sir this is a mcdonalds
@KipSqueaks no
@KipSqueaks sir sir
sirsirsir
ma'am
they/them
heli/copter
with all due respect this is not a Sturmgeschutz III
@rexzion :pensive:
@ReturnOfJeffChandler
Hi, I'm Delta
Steal someone else's tank.
why is everyone saying T
Fun facts:
The MCV1 is a replacement for the LCMBT-105 Challenger I, automatically forcing the LCMBT into a prototype role, not a production. The original description of the Challenger I is now redundant to the LCR lore and timeline, and anachronistic.
There's an unrealeased camouflage that looks similar to that of the Imperial Syllixian Empire's desert camouflage.
This used to operate with a V18, not a V16.
The original name was M1A1 Challenger, not MCV1.
MCV derives from XCV, also known as Experimental Camera Vehicle.
@JustDragon
..and?
real stroker you got there
me who doesn't own PC SP:
Can you reupload this? The Android/Drive download link doesn't exist anymore.
bruh erbody gansta till yo homie roll up in the Cockpit (insert emojis here)
i see what you did there
@PssyalperdnaEgg Abakan used to
@lazycat114
谢谢！
I hope you like the aircraft
Remember men, say the chant!
BASED.
I truly hope for the second to be built without haste and with care.
Merry Christmas.
@HermanTheGermanSherman nice.
do you come from the land down under?
Absolutely amazing plane 10/10
@parkrangerjerry It's meant to be concealed under wings that are realistic - Fuselage wings, if you will. Start reading part descriptions, dammit.
40 parts from the good number
A relic of a legendary era..
1.11 this thing
@Pajamas720 how didn't this build get removed lol
noo slew bad
I love how 1.11 redirects you
YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHH
@HermanTheGermanSherman I see.
@HermanTheGermanSherman But the M2 exists
Why is the US STILL using the M1919?
you are in wright airport
@stevemc01 636 because it's less than the 747
Wait a minute this isnt BeamNG.com
ah yes the boing 636