Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
@TheUltimatePlaneLover The problem is that missile research is not going smoothly. FT missiles have their own limitations, such as not being able to attack enemies with negative proximity rates.
But that's for air-to-air missile.
When you start working with FT, especially practical FT tools, you'll learn to maintain a calm mindset in the face of life's challenges-because fixing bugs is so damn hard!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Your combat performance here is really confusing. Even electromagnetic cannons specialized in armor-piercing attacks can't penetrate your armor. So let me ask you—what exactly can destroy it?
You said, "Oh, this tank was designed to sacrifice speed for heavy armor." Fine, if regular tank shells can't pierce it, I can accept that as part of its unique characteristics.
But now you're telling me, "Oh, electromagnetic cannons can't penetrate it either"? The whole point of electromagnetic cannon tanks is to sacrifice other capabilities for extreme penetration power. Yet you're claiming even those are useless against it. Then let me ask you—does it make sense that "tanks capable of resisting electromagnetic cannons get destroyed by air-to-surface missiles" or "nuke-resistant tanks are eliminated by guided bombs"? If you insist nothing can destroy this tank, what am I supposed to use? Cruise missiles? Ballistic missiles?
And don't get me started on SPsidearm's M5A1 that can withstand ten electromagnetic cannon hits. If I recall correctly, that's their main battle tank. How exactly are we supposed to destroy that? "Oh, it's made from super materials excavated from the desert"—isn't that just lazy hand-waving lore? Why not claim they collaborated with Martians while you're at it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I want to know, how exactly am l supposed to destroy a tank that can withstand ten hits from an electromagnetic cannon? With your sudden material science breakthrough, how is anyone else supposed to compete? @SPsidearm
nice tank
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @SPsidearm Speaking of which, even railgun can't penetrate your tanks. What kind of material are your tanks actually made of?
By the way, can I improve it?
I remember selling three types of planes to the revolutionaries, but I haven't seen them in any of the articles.
And it looks like something was skipped over quickly
"They flew over snowstone, Wright isles, even to Kland, not a single region was missed."
ZG-6C: Unrestricted Airspace Combat Championship Commencing Imminently
@UnitedinOne90 @TheUltimatePlaneLover It's okay, I'm already relieved. I'm just not quite used to this situation, but now I should be able to gradually get used to it
@DeeganishCountryball Most likely to lose both parents. (Of course not, but I would scold you like this)
What you said can be completely achieved with just one piston, that's the reason for my rejection.
(The actual reason for rejection is that FT missiles are difficult to achieve super maneuverability, and of course, the solution is also simple - a flying huge bomb with a near boom range of ten kilometers.)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You probably don't mind, do you. Even if he uses this trick, ZG-6A will not be affected by the outdated guidance formula.
@Lake surely no
I am sorry to hear that
It's strange, I didn't even receive any notification, why?
+1By the way, nice one bro
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore You cut off the function of the most essence... I think it is not as good as track
+1It took us a long time to confirm that it really doesn't have any shock absorbers
Confusing design
+1@Subsere Can you let me see it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover The problem is that missile research is not going smoothly. FT missiles have their own limitations, such as not being able to attack enemies with negative proximity rates.
But that's for air-to-air missile.
When you start working with FT, especially practical FT tools, you'll learn to maintain a calm mindset in the face of life's challenges-because fixing bugs is so damn hard!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover surely…
@SPsidearm surely
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ? wdym
@Subsere Then you just need to write 'Eject' on the detachers
@Subsere "Eject=1"
Which variable did you set for 'Eject'?
?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Your combat performance here is really confusing. Even electromagnetic cannons specialized in armor-piercing attacks can't penetrate your armor. So let me ask you—what exactly can destroy it?
You said, "Oh, this tank was designed to sacrifice speed for heavy armor." Fine, if regular tank shells can't pierce it, I can accept that as part of its unique characteristics.
But now you're telling me, "Oh, electromagnetic cannons can't penetrate it either"? The whole point of electromagnetic cannon tanks is to sacrifice other capabilities for extreme penetration power. Yet you're claiming even those are useless against it. Then let me ask you—does it make sense that "tanks capable of resisting electromagnetic cannons get destroyed by air-to-surface missiles" or "nuke-resistant tanks are eliminated by guided bombs"? If you insist nothing can destroy this tank, what am I supposed to use? Cruise missiles? Ballistic missiles?
And don't get me started on SPsidearm's M5A1 that can withstand ten electromagnetic cannon hits. If I recall correctly, that's their main battle tank. How exactly are we supposed to destroy that? "Oh, it's made from super materials excavated from the desert"—isn't that just lazy hand-waving lore? Why not claim they collaborated with Martians while you're at it?
Congrats on silver!
@SPsidearm I see
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I want to know, how exactly am l supposed to destroy a tank that can withstand ten hits from an electromagnetic cannon? With your sudden material science breakthrough, how is anyone else supposed to compete? @SPsidearm
@SPsidearm I am sorry, how can I use the railgun?
0.001,0.001,0.001…
@SPsidearm thanks
nice tank
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @SPsidearm Speaking of which, even railgun can't penetrate your tanks. What kind of material are your tanks actually made of?
By the way, can I improve it?
@Aano78 Problem solved - adding weight to the rotating shaft
… bye, my old friend…
@Aano78 fine, thanks
@JBPAviation I will try it, thanks
@Aano78 Thank you very much, friend, but I don't think I can change the length
What the hell… It just look…
+2@TheUltimatePlaneLover will, sorry. In fact, I have no way to load any of your pictures
I remember selling three types of planes to the revolutionaries, but I haven't seen them in any of the articles.
And it looks like something was skipped over quickly
?
Creative
+1@AirNK fine
@AirNK The fully moving wingtip was originally a solution for tailless aircraft, but I have never seen the use like you before.
@AirNK If someone really designed all-moving wingtips as control surfaces... that designer must be collaborating with the communists.
One question, I'm sorry, I really don't know - why does the Lambda Wing fold?
@RB107 I see
Kids, we can't use youto.be (sadly)
"They flew over snowstone, Wright isles, even to Kland, not a single region was missed."
ZG-6C: Unrestricted Airspace Combat Championship Commencing Imminently
Cool!
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover fine
+1@AirNK thanks!
@KPLBall This is the only naval unit of our revolutionaries.
Unless you include the three submarines sent by the monarch
@KPLBall ?
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore thanks! But I will definitely make it in the future, mainly because aerial self sighting is a bit difficult to achieve.
+1nice, Although I don't know when we have a helicopter, I would rather know what exactly it is
FPV?
@UnitedinOne90 @TheUltimatePlaneLover It's okay, I'm already relieved. I'm just not quite used to this situation, but now I should be able to gradually get used to it
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Quarreling with people who are difficult to communicate with can easily raise blood pressure
@DeeganishCountryball Thanks!
@DeeganishCountryball Most likely to lose both parents. (Of course not, but I would scold you like this)
What you said can be completely achieved with just one piston, that's the reason for my rejection.
(The actual reason for rejection is that FT missiles are difficult to achieve super maneuverability, and of course, the solution is also simple - a flying huge bomb with a near boom range of ten kilometers.)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover You probably don't mind, do you. Even if he uses this trick, ZG-6A will not be affected by the outdated guidance formula.